Bertuzzi Babe Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Keith wasn't suspended for that hit. I know my history. Try learning yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marleau_12 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Considering Doan got 3 games and he is a repeat offender, Keith will probably get 1-2 (don't think he's been fined/suspended before?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhawks21 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Keith wasn't suspended for that hit. I know my history. Try learning yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Wow...one hit three years ago that resulted in no disciplinary action...wow...what a goon. Quit embarrassing yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Sorry, but I had to deal with you guys on "my board" all night long....and nothing I've said constitutes trolling. I said I agree with someone and I said that Keith was wrong....somehow that makes me a troll. Some of you need to grow up....especially those who take their screen names after guys who committed the most atrocious act in Tell ya what...you want a troll remark. Those of you who want blood and revenge on Keith, the same ones who are complaining about how dirty the hit was...lol...why don't you send Burrows after him to bite his finger and pull his hair? MMkay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.schroeder91 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Wow...one hit three years ago that resulted in no disciplinary action...wow...what a goon. Quit embarrassing yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRSJ Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 What a loss that you don't visit our boards and hang out spouting a bunch of B.S. on others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onions Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 oh leave him alone. Trolls feed on replies. I think the hit was pretty bad. didn't watch the whole game. Didn't see Daniel's hit. can't comment more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni_14 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 He does have a history. he hit Matt Cooke in the head 2 years ago in Pittsburgh. People making same arguments then. Learn your own teams history if you are going to troll this hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackberries Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 What a loss that you don't visit our boards and hang out spouting a bunch of B.S. on others. 2 incidents over an entire career and you consider that a "history of losing your cool". you're a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binderdonedat Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 This is where CDC loses other fans around the leagues support. I have to preface this comment by saying what Dunc pulled was COMPLETELY out of line and as dirty as you can get and he should be hit hard with the rulebook and Shanahan would be completely justified in doing so as it was a clear case of retribution. I'd support a longer suspension because this reaction was unacceptable. But this type of response and attitude, while clearly being fueled by the fresh emotion of tonights game, makes you no better then what Keith pulled on Henrik. With that being said though, you can not ignore the whole reason this whole thing started. I have read constantly all night on here about how Henrik hit Keith in the chest and that is completely and utterly false. The intent WAS to hit him in the chest. I don't think you will find to many people arguing against you there but intent and reality are two completely different animals. Henrik hit Dunc in the head with his shoulder. Dunc was leaned over and Hank is bigger then Dunc to begin with so while it was a bad hit that should have been a penalty I didn't think it was dirty or deserved anything more then some words after the whistle. Dunc obviously didn't see it that way and responded in the worst possible way and he embarrassed himself and the franchise in doing so. Pretty clear suspendable incident but you can't ignore what Hank did to instigate the incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snolan Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 no matter how you slice or dice it that was a dirty freaking hit and SHOULD be a suspension. The sad thing is though, Keith will be gone for far less games than Daniel barring a miracle. So basically, a former art ross winner got KTFO by an elbow, and people are creating reasons for it? Elbows that brutal are pretty rare, and it's pretty clear it was an intent to injure. Say what you will about the old NHL/instigator rule, but that crap would not have flown back then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackberries Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Have fun kids. Make sure you don't burn down the city this year when Bettman and the refs oust you from the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JASON_96 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 I'd give Duncan Keith 5 games and Alex Burrows 2 games for his knee on Keith's groin when he was on top of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackberries Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Hank went through all this and Daniel gets a possible concussion to boot? Damn, Keith really did throw a magic elbow. I digress. Allow me to also preface my initial statment on the matter that has caused offense. I don't disagree with you. Answering violence with violence is an unacceptable practice in any theater, be it hockey, football, even your Mom's weekend bridge tournament. However, once such things do occur, as Duncan Keith did by retaliating on our team's top scorer, the officials job is to then swiftly set forth corrective measures, such as 5 minute major penalties along with game misconducts. With no forthcoming support from the league you speak of, justice still must be served, or every player on the Vancouver Canucks who occasionally scores goals is at further risk. So, respectively, war was not declared by a Sedin, the Canucks, Bryan Adams, or even the township of Whistler, BC. Therefor, what violence might ensue as result of that retaliatory strike, in the absense of league support, lies squarely on the backs of Duncan Keith and the Chicago pockets from which that rickshaw officiating originated. Full stop. Basically, if the NHL doesn't want retaliation for an incident like this they really need to get their officiating out of the gutters. We wouldn't be having this conversation if Keith was hauled off the ice and out of the rink, appropriately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.schroeder91 Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Have fun kids. Make sure you don't burn down the city this year when Bettman and the refs oust you from the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Well it seems the Editorial board has made a hasty decision .. .. a sense of humor is a terrible thing to waste .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty Walrus Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Have fun kids. Make sure you don't burn down the city this year when Bettman and the refs oust you from the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.