linden16kesler17 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Just saw this, no answers but.... Ian Pragovich @IPrago98 @ESPNChiHawks just saw Duncan Keith walking out of UC looked really pissed so foreshadowing bad talk with shanny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpworsley Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 What about Cooke's hit on Keith prior to that? Keith had his back turned to the boards, and Cooke nailed him in the back of the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thLineGrinder Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 What about Cooke's hit on Keith prior to that? Keith had his head turned to the boards, and Cooke nailed him in the back of the head. cooke pushes him down as he is falling and keith gets mad. That's not a better angle, Keith whole body is in front of the camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Save Luongo!!! Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Just saw this, no answers but.... Ian Pragovich @IPrago98 @ESPNChiHawks just saw Duncan Keith walking out of UC looked really pissed so foreshadowing bad talk with shanny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Cooke and Wee Duncan deserve each other .. small-man syndrome in a big mans game .. they both deserve a severe concussion to teach them the path to inner enlightenment .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edler Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 how reliable is that source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linden16kesler17 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 how reliable is that source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 No one here is saying Cooke is an angel, typical S***head argument tactic. The hit was too the head if you cant see that get a bigger monitor faster computer or a pair of glasses It is not up to me or anyone else to lead you to water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magoomba Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 In Shanny's videos, he clearly talks about incidental contact with the head versus situations where the head is specifically targeted. Sedin's hit is border line has he hits Keith with the shoulders. Contact is made in the chest as well as the chin area. Puck is also in play. If nothing else happened during the game, it would have been quite possible that Shanny would review the tape on that hit. It's easy to blame the refs to say they let that hit go so it's grounds for retribution. However, the game is played a fast speed and the refs may not pick up on stuff like that. That's why Shanny's office reviews game tapes. Keith's hit on Sedin is pretty cut and dry. Puck is cleared on a flip and Sedin turns around while lifting his head to track the puck. Keith raises the elbow and pretty much hits only the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Eta to announcement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Within an hour most likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brunners Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I'm pretty sure Keith would have been suspended or even fined if this incident was an elbow to the head, regardless who the recipient was. There was no suspension or fined on this hit, therefore it wasn't an elbow to the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kassassin Train Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 Just be patient folks. I'll post something up when I get the news enjoy the weather hahaha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thLineGrinder Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I'm pretty sure Keith would have been suspended or even fined if this incident was an elbow to the head, regardless who the recipient was. There was no suspension or fined on this hit, therefore it wasn't an elbow to the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Cooke wasn't suspended or fined for his hit on Marc Savard, does that mean that wasn't a dirty hit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 No idea why we're talking about Cooke - but this was just posted on TSN: "Matt Cooke delivered a similar hit at the end of last year, and was suspended for the last ten games of the regular season plus the first round of the playoffs. Now I know Cooke had a much larger history of cheapshots than Keith, but my point is give the player a suspension that's going to deter further illegal action." Should be the same for Keith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{nhl} Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Keith's a sore loser who can't accept a hit, even if it was uncalled, doesn't mean you take it out on the guy ferociously... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neufy161 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 silly question here. Keith waives his rights to an in person hearing. What does this exactly mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Cooke wasn't suspended or fined for his hit on Marc Savard, does that mean that wasn't a dirty hit and/or elbow to the head? A lack of suspension/fine doesn't mean it wasn't an elbow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesTW Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 silly question here. Keith waives his rights to an in person hearing. What does this exactly mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.