Guest AriGold Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 /topic/325897-duncan-keith-suspended-for-5-games/">http://forum.canucks.com/topic/325897-duncan-keith-suspended-for-5-games/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanj Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 lol Well I guess if you want to compare this situation to the Bert/Moore situation, then I don't know if we can continue this discussion as I see no resemblance between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AriGold Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 /topic/325897-duncan-keith-suspended-for-5-games/">http://forum.canucks.com/topic/325897-duncan-keith-suspended-for-5-games/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 kinda makes the rome suspension out to be an even bigger joke than it allready was dosn't it ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airjasper Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 jkasdfasdkljsdkljfasdklsdfjklweiorjqweiojfweio Does that answer your question? The officiating and people running this league are making me hate it. Unbelievable. 5 meaningless games. Keiths elbow had as much intent to injure as Bertuzzi on Moore......... Funny how Rome gets 4 SCF games for a hit that was deemed clean, but a tad late. 4 Stanley Cup Final Games...Keith gets 5 meaningless games.................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift-4 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Now everyone gets to make a thread about the ruling.....................and go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snucks Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Apparently people hit in the way Daniel was have the jaw kind of rattling the brain as it is shoved upward in the hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Guys, seriously, just stop it, 5 games is a very reasonable amount. You guys think that Keith is some sort of villain out to get Danny out of the playoffs? No way! Keith is an honest, respectable Canadian boy, and one of the few players I actually like on the Hawks. Sometimes the game gets intense, and players are caught in the moment. Daniel had a Hit on him earlier that he didn't like, so he wanted to get back at him, not concuss him. All he wanted was Danny flat on his a$$. Not injured. This is why we're the most hated team. NHL called it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 So i guess a 'personal meeting' wasn't required afterall. Certainly there was never going to be one. 5 games is about as i expected. Could've been more if Keith was a repeat offender, but he isn't. Wiznieski was. Hence 8 games instead of 5. The bar has been set. However the new playoff bar, if there is one, should be interesting. However if what Rome did last year gets 4 games will depend on who's hit and who's doing the hitting. Meanwhile, at least Shanny is there explaining it. While Campbell never did. It's the little speech that makes it all the better. Cheers. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quoted Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Isn't this part of the reason we got some guy like Kassian? We wanted to protect our Sedins. Obviously, other teams don't care and they will take runs at the Sedins anyway. I hope he is okay - that's the most important thing. I also hope we don't see a Bertuzzi incident either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I can only imagine what Roger Goodell would do with someone like Duncan Keith. The NFL is serious about this stuff. For the NHL, it's just a goof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spliced Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 5 is about consistant with what they have been calling since Keith gets bonus points for not being suspended. Unfortunately the NHL has sent out the message that losing guys like Backstrom and Daniel on stupid non-hockey play cheapshots isn't a big deal for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Now if there's a first round meeting it's going to be a blood bath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 5 games without their top d-man is pretty significant for a Chicago club that is in no way guaranteed to make the playoffs. When Keith returns he'll have just two games to help them with that battle. Now, if Daniel misses a lot more, like, say, the first round...then it seems more insignificant. Here's hoping that without Keith the Hawks miss the playoffs!!! That Oduya pickup is looking better and better for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ṣpiderman Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 This close to the playoffs I do believe Star players should get star treatmentI mean if a team knows they might have to face that player in the playoffs what's to prevent say Boston from sending out a goon to hurt Crosby or Richards before the playoffs? I know it might be controversial but where there is an intent to injure the quality of the player who got hurt should be one of many factors considered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snucks Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 It was the same ref that allowed a Boston player to punch Daniel in the face in the final last year. That and he let Keith stay in the game. Now after the fact his superiors decide it was a bad hit.Talk about incompetent refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdeath Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I'm completely satisfied. Keith had no prior history so 5 is pretty steep. It also indicates that Brendan's research leads him to believe Daniel will be back by the playoffs (which seems to be the common opinion). I'm happy to move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustJokinen! Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Keith was one of the only Blackhawks I didn't mind. Not anymore, he's shown his true colours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Kane Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niklas Jensen Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Well, Kevin Bieksa has his own 5 for him, it will be 5 rights to his ugly face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.