Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Should Duncan Keith Be Charged With Assault On Daniel Sedin?


lukchin

Recommended Posts

Ummm...no...Daniel didn't lose consciousness in the game, he got back up, PLAYED for like a min or 2 after he got hit, and then went to the locker room. I'm pretty sure that Danny did not get a grade 3 concussion, according to hank he's experiencing a of a headache, and that's normal after you get hit. Im not helping Duncan keith here, but what mcsorley did is totally different from what Keith did. I. Just happy he got a 5 game suspension!!! Dirty bag!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No and you're off your rocker for suggesting he should be. It was a crappy hockey play and that's about it.

As for your "article." It was message board quality with commas where there should have been periods. Needs to be longer and more thought out instead of just 'it happened this one time before so it should happen here, too.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter. The world crapped all over the Canucks when they made their comments right after the game when Moore nailed our team captain and the ensuing ****storm. People have used it as a sign of premeditation on the Canucks part and it's ended up being used against Bert, Crow, and all the way up the organization, in the court case.

If that's the case, Keith's words should be taken as a sign of premeditation on his intent to injure with his dirty, high flying elbow. It doesn't work both ways........what's good for one (or in this case.....bad for one) is good for the other. People who were so quick to label our team for it can now wear the same label, they've earned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...