Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Salary Cap Relation To Standings


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic

#1 Millennium

Millennium

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 09

Posted 23 March 2012 - 10:38 PM

I've been wondering, seeing as we're one of the top spenders in the NHL, always maxing out and reaching the salary cap ceiling, how do the standings relate to the cap space of each team?

Let's take a look (from http://capgeek.com/):

Posted Image

As you can see, Philadelphia, Vancouver, and Washington are very near (or above in some cases) the cap ceiling. Philly is 5th in the league and 5th in the East, Vancouver is 4th in the league and 2nd in the West, Washington is 19th in the league and 8th in the East. So we can assume bluntly; having a high salary cap proves relatively well in the standings.

Then you can noticeably see many teams that are contrary to this: The Colorado Avalanche, with a whopping 15mil cap space remaining but are doing relatively well--9th in the West. The Dallas Stars, with cap space of 14.5mil remaining, but are in 8th in the West. And more noticeable and well-known: The Nashville Predators with 12.7mil cap space--5th in the West, and the St. Louis Blues with 9.4mil cap space--1st in the NHL and 1st in the West.

So what i'm saying is: Seeing as how there is a relation in how much you spend on your roster to make it the best it can be (cap ceiling vs cap floor spending franchise) to how well the team actually does in the league standings--How do the Canucks stand up to other teams in terms of smart spending (good contracts), the level of talent achieved with the said spending, and if the other teams DID spend like the Canucks do (near or above the cap ceiling), would it affect the standings and in turn, our placement in the playoffs/league?

I can't imagine if St. Louis or Nashville spent what they could; essentially St. Louis, with 9.4mil cap space, could add a legitimate top 6 forward and a top 4 defenseman, and Nashville, with 12mil in cap space, could KEEP Weber and Suter, and even add more players to their already strong roster.

Edited by Millennium, 23 March 2012 - 10:49 PM.


#2 McMucus

McMucus

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 391 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 10

Posted 23 March 2012 - 11:38 PM

Nashville is the real head scratcher for me on this one. Luckily the fact that the team is in Nashville keeps quality UFAs away, other wise they'd just be nuts!

#3 Beluga Whale

Beluga Whale

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,191 posts
  • Joined: 12-August 11

Posted 23 March 2012 - 11:56 PM

It doesn't really reflect the standings. Some teams are terrible spenders, like Calgary, Buffalo, Toronto. Some teams are do amazing with low spending; Preds, blues, Stars.
Posted Image
Prestige Worldwide - GM of the Boston Bruins Posted Image




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.