Bedrock Of Vaccination Theory Crumbles As Science Reveals Antibodies Not Necessary To Fight Viruses

[DarthNinja]

(NaturalNews) While the medical, pharmaceutical, and vaccine industries are busy pushing new vaccines for practically every condition under the sun, a new study published in the journal Immunity completely deconstructs the entire vaccination theory. It turns out that the body's natural immune systems, comprised of both innate and adaptive components, work together to ward off disease without the need for antibody-producing vaccines.

The theory behind vaccines is that they mimic infection by spurring B cells, one of the two major types of white blood cells in the immune system, to produce antibodies as part of the adaptive immune system. It is widely believed that these vaccine-induced antibodies, which are part of the more specific adaptive immune system, teach the immune system how to directly respond to an infection before the body becomes exposed to it.

But the new research highlights the fact that innate immunity plays a significant role in fighting infections, and is perhaps more important than adaptive immunity at preventing or fighting infections. In tests, adaptive immune system antibodies were shown unable to fight infection by themselves, which in essence debunks the theory that vaccine-induced antibodies serve any legitimate function in preventing or fighting off infection.

"Our findings contradict the current view that antibodies are absolutely required to survive infection with viruses like VSV (vesicular stomatitis virus), and establish an unexpected function for B cells as custodians of macrophages in antiviral immunity," said Dr. Uldrich H. von Andrian from Harvard Medical School. "It will be important to further dissect the role of antibodies and interferons in immunity against similar viruses that attack the nervous system, such as rabies, West Nile virus, and Encephalitis."

As explained by Dr. Russell Blaylock in a recent interview with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, vaccines not only do not work as advertised, but they actually damage the body's innate immunity. Rather than teach the body how to respond to infections, vaccines actually inhibit the immune system's ability to produce TH2-type cytokines, and suppress cellular immunity, which is how the body protects itself against deadly viruses and bacteria.

So once again, the myth that vaccinations serve any sort of legitimate medical purpose has been deconstructed by breakthrough science. Regardless of whether or not the mainstream medical community wants to admit it, pro-vaccine ideology is increasingly finding itself in the dustheap of outmoded pseudoscience.

http://www.naturalnews.com/035371_vaccine_theory_antibodies_viruses.html

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/242403.php

[dank.]

Funny humans trying to play God.

We've survived this long without any need of preventative "medicine". it's sad that people would have been scared into believing it was now necessary. Stop injecting yourself and your children. Do not trust the Government.

[Special Ed]

Glad I refused to ever get vaccinated.

[Special Ed]

Funny humans trying to play God.

We've survived this long without any need of preventative "medicine". it's sad that people would have been scared into believing it was now necessary. Stop injecting yourself and your children. Do not trust the Government.

[Bertuzzi Babe]

Funny humans trying to play God.

We've survived this long without any need of preventative "medicine". it's sad that people would have been scared into believing it was now necessary. Stop injecting yourself and your children. Do not trust the Government.

[Cause=Time]

I never trust anyone that's motivated for money. The pharmaceutical industry, how much money do they need?

Like you said, we have survived this long. Why would we need to start adding all these things to our bodies?

It's only asking for trouble.

[butters]

A bunch of concerned parents in various communities went down this path, and it led to the recent mumps outbreaks in the states amonst other things. OP, unlike all the other consipracy theory stuff you believe, this one has real world reprecussions, so give it a lot of thought before you buy into it.

[DarthNinja]

Google the number of children who used to die of smallpox before vaccinations. Google the number of children who used to die of measles before vaccinations. Now check the numbers for after vaccinations against those two things. Funny thing that, we've been vaccinating children against these things for how long now? Not exactly 'surviving' without any need of 'preventative medicine', is it?

[woot]

Google the number of children who used to die of smallpox before vaccinations. Google the number of children who used to die of measles before vaccinations. Now check the numbers for after vaccinations against those two things. Funny thing that, we've been vaccinating children against these things for how long now? Not exactly 'surviving' without any need of 'preventative medicine', is it?

[dank.]

Well I guess Doctors from Harvard are clearly just a bunch of crack pot, tin foil hatters.

Thanks for repeating the doctrine, I almost got caught believing news from a non mainstream media source. What was I thinking?

Go back to bed. Shut up. Take your medicine. Big Pharma knows best. Believe our reports. Ignore legitimate outside sources. Go to sleep.

[dank.]

.

[DarthNinja]

A bunch of concerned parents in various communities went down this path, and it led to the recent mumps outbreaks in the states amonst other things. OP, unlike all the other consipracy theory stuff you believe, this one has real world reprecussions, so give it a lot of thought before you buy into it.

[DarthNinja]

Well I guess Doctors from Harvard are clearly just a bunch of crack pot, tin foil hatters.

Thanks for repeating the doctrine, I almost got caught believing news from a non mainstream media source. What was I thinking?

Go back to bed. Shut up. Take your medicine. Big Pharma knows best. Believe our reports. Ignore legitimate outside sources. Go to sleep.

[butters]

Uhh huh.

[Bertuzzi Babe]

look, just don't vaccinate your kids and then tell them your beliefs when they get the mumps later in life.

[MadMonk]

The article you cited is extremely biased, and made a number of assertions that is not support by the research itself. I suggests that you at least read up on the neutral report on the research, if not the research itself:

Antibodies Are Not Required for Immunity Against Some Viruses

ScienceDaily (Mar. 1, 2012) — A new study turns the well established theory that antibodies are required for antiviral immunity upside down and reveals that an unexpected partnership between the specific and non-specific divisions of the immune system is critical for fighting some types of viral infections. The research, published online on March 1st in the journal Immunity by Cell Press, may lead to a new understanding of the best way to help protect those exposed to potentially lethal viruses, such as the rabies virus.

The immune system has two main branches, innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is a first line of defense that relies on cells and mechanisms that provide non-specific immunity. The more sophisticated adaptive immunity, which counts antibody-producing B cells as part of its arsenal, is thought to play a major role in the specific response to viral infections in mammals. However, adaptive immune responses require time to become fully mobilized.

"Mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) can suffer fatal invasion of the central nervous system even when they have a high concentration of anti-VSV antibodies in their system," explains senior study author, Dr. Ulrich H. von Andrian, from Harvard Medical School. "This observation led us to revisit the contribution of adaptive immune responses to survival following VSV infection."

The research team studied VSV infection in mice that had B cells but did not produce antibodies. Unexpectedly, although the B cells themselves were essential, survival after VSV exposure did not require antibodies or other aspects of traditional adaptive immunity."We determined that the B cells produced a chemical needed to maintain innate immune cells called macrophages. The macrophages produced type I interferons, which were required to prevent fatal VSV invasion," says co-author Dr. Matteo Iannacone.

Taken together, the results show that the essential role of B cells against VSV does not require adaptive mechanisms, but is instead directly linked with the innate immune system. "Our findings contradict the current view that antibodies are absolutely required to survive infection with viruses like VSV, and establish an unexpected function for B cells as custodians of macrophages in antiviral immunity," concludes Dr. von Andrian. "It will be important to further dissect the role of antibodies and interferons in immunity against similar viruses that attack the nervous system, such as rabies, West Nile virus, and Encephalitis."

[DarthNinja]

look, just don't vaccinate your kids and then tell them your beliefs when they get the mumps later in life.

[Cause=Time]

What makes you think they are going to get the mumps later in life?

The government told you so?

[DoorKnob]

look, just don't vaccinate your kids and then tell them your beliefs when they get the mumps later in life.

[Hobble]

I thank everyday the fine scientists in the pharmaceutical community for my restless-leg syndrome vaccine.

It has been two months and my leg hasn't moved at all!!!