Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Cory's Had A Shutout.....or Did He?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
37 replies to this topic

#1 KelMo

KelMo

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 09

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:20 PM

I was watching Garret showing the highlights of Cory's game last night and this caught my eye. I had to take a picture from my projector screen, so the resoluition isn't too great. Looks like the puck crossed the line, but I recall we got burned on this before, so all's well that ends well

Attached Files


"It's not the band I hate, it's their fans"

#2 avelanch

avelanch

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,791 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 07

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:22 PM

where is the puck supposed to be located in that picture?

#3 KelMo

KelMo

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 09

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:23 PM

It was in his glove. He made the save, which pushed his glove back and then he pulled it out and around the post.
"It's not the band I hate, it's their fans"

#4 Shift-4

Shift-4

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,452 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 06

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:25 PM

When did this happen? Was there a review?
Hockey is the only sport, the rest are just games.

#5 xereau

xereau

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,231 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:25 PM

Yeah I saw that in the 'quick preview game highlights going to commercial' on TSN last night.

But the anchors said nothing.

The game commentators said nothing as it happened, or in later analysis.

The refs said nothing as it happened.

Moot point now, anyways.

The big zero is official.


"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man:
brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the

timid join him; for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."

Mark Twain


#6 CHodgson9

CHodgson9

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 450 posts
  • Joined: 05-December 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:26 PM

Shutout on the board, league views it as one, and that's ALL this fan cares about.
"You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Mahatma Ghandi

#7 Shift-4

Shift-4

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,452 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 06

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:27 PM

And it's called a Hat Trick ::D
Hockey is the only sport, the rest are just games.

#8 nux4lyfe

nux4lyfe

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,051 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 03

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:27 PM

SSSHHHHH! Delete this post ASAP before the NHL reverses the call and gives us a L . They are already conspiring against us we don't need to help them. :rolleyes:

13zpnd4.jpg

Thank You Twilight Sparkle for the dope sig!


#9 D-Money

D-Money

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,097 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 06

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:28 PM

Once the official call is made (or, not made), whether or not the puck went in is a moot point.


Just ask these guys:

Posted Image
Posted Image

#10 Geoff Peterson

Geoff Peterson

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 428 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:32 PM

Canucks had a puck go in their net, called back due to ref blowing whistle too soon... so we still win 2-1 ...'CBS CARES'

#11 Strombone1

Strombone1

    GDT Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,620 posts
  • Joined: 06-November 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:34 PM

^^^ the refs blew their whistle way before it went in.

 Commissioner of Shapheat FHL

Player of the Game - Wall of Fame
2014-15 GDT Registrations


#12 pwnstar

pwnstar

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,311 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 10

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:34 PM

1st star of the night on NHL.COM says hello

Posted Image


#13 NuckFanLivingInCalgary:(

NuckFanLivingInCalgary:(

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 143 posts
  • Joined: 27-March 12

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:42 PM

SSSHHHHH! Delete this post ASAP before the NHL reverses the call and gives us a L . They are already conspiring against us we don't need to help them. :rolleyes:


Lolz
Go Canucks Go!!!

#14 WolfxHaley

WolfxHaley

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 950 posts
  • Joined: 07-January 10

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:42 PM

More then one Cory had a shut out??

Posted Image


#15 avelanch

avelanch

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,791 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 07

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:43 PM

Once the official call is made (or, not made), whether or not the puck went in is a moot point.


Just ask these guys:

Posted Image

or this guy:
Posted Image

#16 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,632 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:55 PM

I'm pretty sure that was the play where Hamhuis slid back and almost knocked the puck into his own net... the puck ended up under cory's pad which obvioulsy was not over the line.

here it is in this video


watch at 3:03.... you will see schneids' glove go into the net but the puck is under his pad.

Edited by CanucksFanMike, 29 March 2012 - 02:56 PM.

Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#17 suolucidir

suolucidir

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,221 posts
  • Joined: 04-December 05

Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:56 PM

Called off with no review due to whistle. Doesn't matter where the puck was.
PSN: CloakOfSkill

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists somewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.

It bugs me when people pull out the gold medal for an example... Luongo only had to outplay Brodeur.


#18 *VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS*

*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS*

    Lul

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,756 posts
  • Joined: 26-March 09

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:07 PM

lol... that is not even the puck in his glove

Posted Image

^Vintage Canuck^

CDC STHS Hockey League Commissioner

CDC STHS Tampa Bay Lightning


#19 avelanch

avelanch

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,791 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 07

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:13 PM

yeah, the puck was under his leg, and slid to his midsection, the video CanucksFanMike posted shows it clear as day.

#20 The Belfast Cowboy

The Belfast Cowboy

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • Joined: 29-September 09

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:13 PM

I'm pretty sure that was the play where Hamhuis slid back and almost knocked the puck into his own net... the puck ended up under cory's pad which obvioulsy was not over the line.

here it is in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FStDcB8aHAA

watch at 3:03.... you will see schneids' glove go into the net but the puck is under his pad.




This

#21 avelanch

avelanch

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,791 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 07

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:15 PM

yeah, the puck hit his foot, went under his leg pad and slid to his waist. it was never in his glove.

#22 drdeath

drdeath

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,140 posts
  • Joined: 20-April 03

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:16 PM

Nice link Mike. The puck is clearly under his left pad, Landeskog is trying to pry it free.

aXmDa9t.gif


#23 Leahpar

Leahpar

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Joined: 07-January 12

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:16 PM

I'm pretty sure that was the play where Hamhuis slid back and almost knocked the puck into his own net... the puck ended up under cory's pad which obvioulsy was not over the line.

here it is in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FStDcB8aHAA

watch at 3:03.... you will see schneids' glove go into the net but the puck is under his pad.





I think you're right. The puck was in his pads

#24 Rink on Renfrew

Rink on Renfrew

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,307 posts
  • Joined: 26-October 09

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:17 PM

Yup the puck was under the pad. I saw it on the first replay shown durning the broadcast.

I didn't think it was that hard to see.

#25 Carson Graham

Carson Graham

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 448 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:34 PM

where is the puck supposed to be located in that picture?


The puck is at the other end

#26 Toni Zamboni

Toni Zamboni

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,680 posts
  • Joined: 04-December 08

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:49 PM

at 3:11 of the above video the puck is clearly saved by corys leg and stays under his pad.
op's photo shows nothing.

#27 etsen3

etsen3

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,604 posts
  • Joined: 02-July 10

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:54 PM

Huh? The pic proves nothing. The puck isn't even in the frame.

#28 kessywessy

kessywessy

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 03:59 PM

now that this misunderstanding is cleared, i'm pretty sure that this thread is useless...

#29 Tits J. McGee

Tits J. McGee

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 464 posts
  • Joined: 11-March 07

Posted 29 March 2012 - 04:11 PM

Even if it was in his glove, it would probably still wouldn't be a goal. You have to have conclusive evidence that the puck is past the goal line. Since you can't tell where in the glove the puck is (hypothetically), it is not conclusive that the puck passed the goal line. Therefore (imaginary) no goal.
All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy.

#30 Landeskog

Landeskog

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Joined: 26-June 11

Posted 29 March 2012 - 05:25 PM

Nice link Mike. The puck is clearly under his left pad, Landeskog is trying to pry it free.

I did not.
But if I was on the ice I might have thrown the puck into the Colorado net.




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.