Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Boohoomeester


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
22 replies to this topic

#1 Nuck-Shot

Nuck-Shot

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,370 posts
  • Joined: 08-March 07

Posted 31 March 2012 - 07:02 PM

That emotion looks good on him after all that hype b4 the phlegms inked him to that massive contract. Have fun lowering your handicap this summer ,and fighting for scraps at the northwest div doghouse for years to come. Long live our humble players and their depth friendly contracts.
Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#2 TheEhrhoffEffect

TheEhrhoffEffect

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,091 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 31 March 2012 - 07:14 PM

Flames= 1 Stanley Cup
Canucks= 0 Stanley Cups

#3 Nuck-Shot

Nuck-Shot

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,370 posts
  • Joined: 08-March 07

Posted 31 March 2012 - 07:30 PM

Not for long
Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#4 Bertuzzi Babe

Bertuzzi Babe

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts
  • Joined: 03-May 03

Posted 31 March 2012 - 07:51 PM

Flames= 1 Stanley Cup
Canucks= 0 Stanley Cups


So? And your off topic point is...........something?

Edited by Bertuzzi Babe, 31 March 2012 - 07:51 PM.

"Sursumredditio" non usquam in hac mea loquantur!



Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.....



#5 Amish Rake Fighter

Amish Rake Fighter

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,368 posts
  • Joined: 06-October 08

Posted 31 March 2012 - 08:00 PM

Flames= 1 Stanley Cup
Canucks= 0 Stanley Cups


Ehrhoff=no balls so no cup needed

121f1930-9c2f-4a76-81c7-d533bed290ba.jpg


#6 oldnews

oldnews

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,926 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 31 March 2012 - 10:40 PM

Not sure what emotion you are referring to OP? Was he crying after the game? I personally don't dislike him - it's just obvious that he isn't able to live up to his contract.
I thought Calgary played a strong game tonight. As much as I have always loved watching the Canucks beat them, the pleasure in this victory was solely due to the fact it put the Nucks back in first. I could not stand the Flames for a long, long time, but they were a dirty, clutch and grab team before the rule changes, whereas now I think they play the game the right way, and have a lot of class acts wearing their uniform. I hope they don't blow it up, but make the necessary moves - Bouwmeester's $6.7 cap hit probably has to be first priority.

#7 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,511 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 31 March 2012 - 10:45 PM

Given how stacked those Flames teams were in the 80's, i'm surprised they only have one cup, to be honest. But i guess they weren't gift-wrapped a Gretzky.

Hey... Remember the 80's? The A-Team. Mullets. Wang Chung. And Alberta hockey dominance.

Jay Bouwmeester is quite possibly the easiest 'number 1' defenseman to score on in the entire NHL. But Phaneuf is right there as well. Meh.


TOML
Posted Image

#8 Bure1994Mclean

Bure1994Mclean

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,774 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 31 March 2012 - 10:47 PM

The Flames have done wonders for Jokinen and Boumeesters careers.
OMG SUNDIN.

The word fear is not in our dictionary, it is in the eyes of the enemy.

The objective of war is not to die for your country, it is to make the enemy die for theirs.

One generation plants the trees, the other gets the shade.

#9 Nuck-Shot

Nuck-Shot

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,370 posts
  • Joined: 08-March 07

Posted 31 March 2012 - 11:56 PM

Jokinen is he ever regressing
Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#10 Thrill-House

Thrill-House

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,772 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 06

Posted 31 March 2012 - 11:57 PM

I wonder which ex-Flame will be brought back for next season.
Posted Image

#11 TheEhrhoffEffect

TheEhrhoffEffect

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,091 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 01 April 2012 - 01:13 AM

Ehrhoff=no balls so no cup needed

Sounds good.

#12 Losing With Pride

Losing With Pride

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,711 posts
  • Joined: 21-November 06

Posted 01 April 2012 - 06:37 PM

Bouwmeester wasn't crying. He is just awkward during interviews. Have you heard him in an interview previously? I remember when he signed with Calgary and they had that big press conference. It was painful to watch and listen. He wasn't happy but he wasn't crying ether. He is just socially awkward or super shy.

#13 playboi19

playboi19

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,282 posts
  • Joined: 15-August 08

Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:07 PM

Phaneuf - Reghr

Bouwmeester

Flames Fans "We have 3 Olympic Defenseman"








Steve Yzerman "No."

Subbancopy.jpg


#14 WiDeN

WiDeN

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,750 posts
  • Joined: 08-December 06

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:41 PM

The ONLY two Flames I would want on our team is Iginla and Cammelari (sp?).

I wouldn't even take Kipper. He's not as good as Schneider.

Backlund? Granlund?

Most of our healthy scratches would be in the middle of their line-up.

V a n c o u v e r C a n u c k s

Posted Image
2 0 14 S t a n l e y C u p C h a m p i o n s


#15 rotiman187

rotiman187

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,291 posts
  • Joined: 23-October 09

Posted 01 April 2012 - 11:21 PM

Not going to lie, I wanted the canucks to sign him during FA, but then again im sure a lot of people did.
Posted Image

#16 Blood Fiend

Blood Fiend

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts
  • Joined: 17-January 12

Posted 01 April 2012 - 11:25 PM

Flames= 1 Stanley Cup
Canucks= 0 Stanley Cups


It's not what you've done for me, It's what you've done for me latly!

calgary sucks.

#17 marleau_12

marleau_12

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,286 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 04

Posted 01 April 2012 - 11:43 PM

I wonder which ex-Flame will be brought back for next season.

Probably Sean Donovan.
Posted Image

#18 Kubrick

Kubrick

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 249 posts
  • Joined: 27-July 09

Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:37 AM

Anton Babchuk please!!!
Posted Image

#19 oldnews

oldnews

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,926 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 02 April 2012 - 10:40 AM

The ONLY two Flames I would want on our team is Iginla and Cammelari (sp?).

I wouldn't even take Kipper. He's not as good as Schneider.

Backlund? Granlund?

Most of our healthy scratches would be in the middle of their line-up.


no thanks on Camm's ridiculous cap hit - love Ig, but can't do his cap hit either.

The two guys I would take are Glencross and Giordano...

#20 D-Money

D-Money

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,735 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 06

Posted 02 April 2012 - 10:59 AM

Jay Bo isn't a bad defenseman - just overpaid. Saying he sucks is like saying "Brian Campbell sucks" last year.

I think Jay is stagnating on that team. A younger, faster team would suit his strengths far more.

If he really wants to be part of a winner in the near future, he should waive his no-trade to go to the Islanders. They would actually trade for him (since they have had so much trouble attracting a free agent defenseman). And with a young, skilled team, and Streit paired with him, I think they'd be a playoff team as early as next season.
Posted Image

#21 Florence

Florence

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,601 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 02 April 2012 - 11:06 AM

Flames= 1 Stanley Cup
Canucks= 0 Stanley Cups


I am curious as to how this is relevant?

Bouwmeester is literally the anti Chris Drury, all he does is lose. He has 0 cups and has never even played a single playoff game in the NHL. He made the playoffs once in the AHL and was scoreless in 18 games (had 9 points in 18 previously) before getting swept in the Calder Cup Finals to the Philadelphia Phantoms. Never made the playoffs in the WHL.

Losing follows him.

Everyone+knows+a+Sasha+gif+was+going+to+


#22 Canucks_fo_life

Canucks_fo_life

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,562 posts
  • Joined: 07-September 06

Posted 02 April 2012 - 01:27 PM

Blowmeester is the worst contract in the NHL, by a longshot, he'll never play in a playoff game in his entire career, unless he leaves calgary.

I really hope he stays on that collapsing bridge that is the flames
I rather lose with the Canucks, than win with any other team

This is OUR year

GO CANUCKS GOOOOOO!!!!!!!

#23 250Integra

250Integra

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,066 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 06

Posted 02 April 2012 - 01:28 PM

Blowmeester is the worst contract in the NHL, by a longshot, he'll never play in a playoff game in his entire career, unless he leaves calgary.

I really hope he stays on that collapsing bridge that is the flames


Scott Gomez says Hi
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Thanks for the Memories Canada!!!
Thanks for everything Naslund!
Original creator of the WWE and the Rate my sig / Showoff thread




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.