Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

coleycanuck

Interesting Article On Upside Of Daniel's Injury

Recommended Posts

Ya obviously. How else am i going to get 100 views in an hour, but does it matter? Anyways i'm looking for feedback, did you actually read it? What did you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like our first line the way it is. I say when he comes back

same

Daniel-Kesler-Booth

same

same

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for one you presented like it wasn't your own... "a good article... worth the read". You should be honest an upfront about it being yours rather than pretending to be an interested reader to help you gain views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we like to hate on Boston but I think this is what won Boston the cup, the players elevated themselves to fill Horton's roster spot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I got flamed a little, it's ok, been flamed before. The OP was dishonest in his presentation of the article. Just my take on it. BTW, so we are clear, the article was an ok read. And, I did not report the OP, the mods pick up on stuff on their own just fine.

/forum-26/announcement-16-canucks-forum-rules-please-read/">http://forum.canucks...es-please-read/

9. There will be no advertising or selling of any kind on this board.

This includes selling tickets or merchandise, referal/invite links or soliciting to join another message board. Any promotional content posted or displayed in signature or profiles will not be tolerated.

What's not ok:

  • Any 'classified' type advertisements

  • Threads, posts, links, or sigs advertising games

  • Any promotion to a website with intent to syphon traffic or make a profit

  • Advertisements and links to other message boards

  • Requesting for or selling merchandise in signatures

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man quit being so anal, what's the diff if he wrote it here or a blog?...people post their youtube vids here all the time as well as art work..chill out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I got flamed a little, it's ok, been flamed before. The OP was dishonest in his presentation of the article. Just my take on it. BTW, so we are clear, the article was an ok read. And, I did not report the OP, the mods pick up on stuff on their own just fine.

/forum-26/announcement-16-canucks-forum-rules-please-read/">http://forum.canucks...es-please-read/

9. There will be no advertising or selling of any kind on this board.

This includes selling tickets or merchandise, referal/invite links or soliciting to join another message board. Any promotional content posted or displayed in signature or profiles will not be tolerated.

What's not ok:

  • Any 'classified' type advertisements

  • Threads, posts, links, or sigs advertising games

  • Any promotion to a website with intent to syphon traffic or make a profit

  • Advertisements and links to other message boards

  • Requesting for or selling merchandise in signatures

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for the record, there is no intent to make profit. it's a blog without any advertising, and I only created it as a means to get my opinion out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the article, those stats are very interesting; looking forward to seeing how it pans out.

@WL Canuck Fan, lol, This is a ridicules argument... there is absolutely no barring on you, as a reader what so ever... your just finding reasons to complain and targeting them. Look at the underlying reason for that rule.

"Any Promotion to a website with intent to siphon traffic"

Clearly, we can assume, this rule is in place so CDC maximizes user traffic and dont lose any viewers to external sites.

...this is a personal blog, and the degree of information would never be great enough to have a negative effect on CDC's traffic.

People posting articles to the Vancouver sun would be more threatening then a personal blog... with 1 writer.

Time to relax, go lay down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the article, those stats are very interesting; looking forward to seeing how it pans out.

@WL Canuck Fan, lol, This is a ridicules argument... there is absolutely no barring on you, as a reader what so ever... your just finding reasons to complain and targeting them. Look at the underlying reason for that rule.

"Any Promotion to a website with intent to siphon traffic"

Clearly, we can assume, this rule is in place so CDC maximizes user traffic and dont lose any viewers to external sites.

...this is a personal blog, and the degree of information would never be great enough to have a negative effect on CDC's traffic.

People posting articles to the Vancouver sun would be more threatening then a personal blog... with 1 writer.

Time to relax, go lay down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.