Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

coleycanuck

Interesting Article On Upside Of Daniel's Injury

24 posts in this topic

I'm gonna go out on a limb and suggest that you wrote the article in question.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya obviously. How else am i going to get 100 views in an hour, but does it matter? Anyways i'm looking for feedback, did you actually read it? What did you think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like our first line the way it is. I say when he comes back

same

Daniel-Kesler-Booth

same

same

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm, trolling, spamming, stealing traffic. Huh. Say hello to the mods soon.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we like to hate on Boston but I think this is what won Boston the cup, the players elevated themselves to fill Horton's roster spot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man quit being so anal, what's the diff if he wrote it here or a blog?...people post their youtube vids here all the time as well as art work..chill out...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm, trolling, spamming, stealing traffic. Huh. Say hello to the mods soon.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting view OP. Thanks for taking the time to write a good piece...and share it.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I got flamed a little, it's ok, been flamed before. The OP was dishonest in his presentation of the article. Just my take on it. BTW, so we are clear, the article was an ok read. And, I did not report the OP, the mods pick up on stuff on their own just fine.

/forum-26/announcement-16-canucks-forum-rules-please-read/">http://forum.canucks...es-please-read/

9. There will be no advertising or selling of any kind on this board.

This includes selling tickets or merchandise, referal/invite links or soliciting to join another message board. Any promotional content posted or displayed in signature or profiles will not be tolerated.

What's not ok:

  • Any 'classified' type advertisements

  • Threads, posts, links, or sigs advertising games

  • Any promotion to a website with intent to syphon traffic or make a profit

  • Advertisements and links to other message boards

  • Requesting for or selling merchandise in signatures

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man quit being so anal, what's the diff if he wrote it here or a blog?...people post their youtube vids here all the time as well as art work..chill out...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I got flamed a little, it's ok, been flamed before. The OP was dishonest in his presentation of the article. Just my take on it. BTW, so we are clear, the article was an ok read. And, I did not report the OP, the mods pick up on stuff on their own just fine.

/forum-26/announcement-16-canucks-forum-rules-please-read/">http://forum.canucks...es-please-read/

9. There will be no advertising or selling of any kind on this board.

This includes selling tickets or merchandise, referal/invite links or soliciting to join another message board. Any promotional content posted or displayed in signature or profiles will not be tolerated.

What's not ok:

  • Any 'classified' type advertisements

  • Threads, posts, links, or sigs advertising games

  • Any promotion to a website with intent to syphon traffic or make a profit

  • Advertisements and links to other message boards

  • Requesting for or selling merchandise in signatures

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for the record, there is no intent to make profit. it's a blog without any advertising, and I only created it as a means to get my opinion out there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the article, those stats are very interesting; looking forward to seeing how it pans out.

@WL Canuck Fan, lol, This is a ridicules argument... there is absolutely no barring on you, as a reader what so ever... your just finding reasons to complain and targeting them. Look at the underlying reason for that rule.

"Any Promotion to a website with intent to siphon traffic"

Clearly, we can assume, this rule is in place so CDC maximizes user traffic and dont lose any viewers to external sites.

...this is a personal blog, and the degree of information would never be great enough to have a negative effect on CDC's traffic.

People posting articles to the Vancouver sun would be more threatening then a personal blog... with 1 writer.

Time to relax, go lay down.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the article, those stats are very interesting; looking forward to seeing how it pans out.

@WL Canuck Fan, lol, This is a ridicules argument... there is absolutely no barring on you, as a reader what so ever... your just finding reasons to complain and targeting them. Look at the underlying reason for that rule.

"Any Promotion to a website with intent to siphon traffic"

Clearly, we can assume, this rule is in place so CDC maximizes user traffic and dont lose any viewers to external sites.

...this is a personal blog, and the degree of information would never be great enough to have a negative effect on CDC's traffic.

People posting articles to the Vancouver sun would be more threatening then a personal blog... with 1 writer.

Time to relax, go lay down.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.