Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

Dan Hamhuis-Wow!


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
97 replies to this topic

#91 fwybwed

fwybwed

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,563 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 03

Posted 08 June 2012 - 09:03 AM

He had a brutal playoffs along with everyone else, but wasn't nearly as bad as Bieksa or Edler.

This team needs more Hamhuises and less Bieksas and Ballards.


I agree to a point hamhuis is a good offensive defense hence the +/- rating. But he did coff up the puck in game five which should have been a common skate on the rink....I think that ballard is finally feeling like a canuck with what transpired last year. against boston.As for Bieksa he's got a lame wrister ....

#92 PavelsElbow

PavelsElbow

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 278 posts
  • Joined: 04-January 12

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:08 AM

He had a brutal playoffs along with everyone else, but wasn't nearly as bad as Bieksa or Edler.

This team needs more Hamhuises and less Bieksas and Ballards.


Hamhuis didnt have a brutal playoff... he was EASILY our best player in game 5. Thats why it sucked how he was the one to cough up the puck after such a solid performance. Watch the games again Hamhuis was the one player, day in and day out, who played well.


#93 Paul_Kariya28

Paul_Kariya28

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 285 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 12

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:10 AM

He's nothing special. He's the reason we lost to LA

#94 Sanj

Sanj

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 727 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:24 AM

He's nothing special. He's the reason we lost to LA


Not that I have a lot of posts but your count of 16 makes it understandable why your post is full of failure.

#95 oldnews

oldnews

    Declining Grinder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,148 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:51 AM

He's nothing special. He's the reason we lost to LA


No. But he's the reason we lost to Boston.

#96 TheCammer

TheCammer

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,844 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 08

Posted 08 June 2012 - 12:19 PM

He's nothing special. He's the reason we lost to LA


Troll, much?
258bdr6.jpg

#97 TheCammer

TheCammer

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,844 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 08

Posted 08 June 2012 - 12:23 PM

Hamhuis is a great defenceman and his biggest contribution other than his generally stellar defensive game is he makes Bieksa more effective. As partners it is clear they trust one another. Hamhuis stay at home style allows Bieksa to take more risks which has created the opportunity for more offensive contribution from him.
258bdr6.jpg

#98 Xbox

Xbox

    Formerly Lups

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,914 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 11

Posted 08 June 2012 - 12:32 PM

He we paired with Weber at the Olympics for sure. Chemistry is important

2yo50sh.jpg

small.pngGM - STHS                                  Sig Cred to -Vintage Canuck-

 

 





Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.