Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Nucks fan in TO

Have We Seen The Last Of Grags This Year

34 posts in this topic

Here's the depth chart IMO -

Edler

Hamhuis

Bieksa

Salo

Ballard

Rome

Tanev

Alberts

Gragnani

So basically we need 3 injuries to see MAG in the playoffs, which isn't that unlikely.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sulzer,Ehrhoff and Samuelsson would look good in the post season.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is worse defensively than Bieksa. What do you think?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the depth chart IMO -

Edler

Hamhuis

Bieksa

Salo

Ballard

Rome

Tanev

Alberts

Gragnani

So basically we need 3 injuries to see MAG in the playoffs, which isn't that unlikely.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gragnani really needs to work on his defensive side of the game, he is one of the

reasons Luongo had a bad game against the Ducks the other night.

Maybe Gragnani should spend some time in the AHL, so he can fine tune his game

incase he is need for the playoffs with the Canucks...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We thought the same of Ballard, & more recently of Raymond.....& they r still right here

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

probably wont but with our luck with injuries i wouldn't doubt it

He might need some time on the wolves to work on the defensive side of his game but he does have some promise

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Debateable, but it's a moot point since they don't play for us anymore.

Samuelsson got us Booth, Ehrhoff has no one to blame but himself, and Sulzer was getting less ice time than Gragnani is now. Just because they're somewhere else doesn't mean they'd be good for us.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty close to my depth

Hamhuis

Edler

Bieksa

Salo

Ballard

Tanev

Alberts

Rome

Gragnani/ Connauton

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree.It may be irrelevant but I am thinking about it so it is relevant.Surprise.

Samuelsson led the Canucks in playoff scoring two years ago.

Gragnani is a dud at this stage.Sulzer has proven to be a reliable veteran.

Ehrhoff has Bieksa and GIllis to blame.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree.It may be irrelevant but I am thinking about it so it is relevant.Surprise.

Samuelsson led the Canucks in playoff scoring two years ago.

Gragnani is a dud at this stage.Sulzer has proven to be a reliable veteran.

Ehrhoff has Bieksa and GIllis to blame.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think of Samuelsson's play in the LA season. Hopefullly he'll do well for Florida.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

he should tryout as a forward next year.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Edler goes down & its a possibility (to replace some offense). Anyone else goes down & I'd rather see whichever of Ballard, Rome, or Alberts. Tanev is already locked in ahead of these players (maybe Ballard goes ahead of Tanev, but?).

I'd also call up Connauton before playing Gragnani, especially for that offensive role.

The Canucks have played him enough to attain the right to match contract offers for him in the offseason, so Tanev is back in tonight. Does anyone think he'll see significant time in the postseason?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.