DownUndaCanuck Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Here's the depth chart IMO - Edler Hamhuis Bieksa Salo Ballard Rome Tanev Alberts Gragnani So basically we need 3 injuries to see MAG in the playoffs, which isn't that unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Sulzer,Ehrhoff and Samuelsson would look good in the post season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 He is worse defensively than Bieksa. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ballisticsports. Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Here's the depth chart IMO - Edler Hamhuis Bieksa Salo Ballard Rome Tanev Alberts Gragnani So basically we need 3 injuries to see MAG in the playoffs, which isn't that unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VancouverStyle Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Gragnani really needs to work on his defensive side of the game, he is one of the reasons Luongo had a bad game against the Ducks the other night. Maybe Gragnani should spend some time in the AHL, so he can fine tune his game incase he is need for the playoffs with the Canucks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson Graham Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 We thought the same of Ballard, & more recently of Raymond.....& they r still right here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themcdeal Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 probably wont but with our luck with injuries i wouldn't doubt it He might need some time on the wolves to work on the defensive side of his game but he does have some promise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Debateable, but it's a moot point since they don't play for us anymore. Samuelsson got us Booth, Ehrhoff has no one to blame but himself, and Sulzer was getting less ice time than Gragnani is now. Just because they're somewhere else doesn't mean they'd be good for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Pretty close to my depth Hamhuis Edler Bieksa Salo Ballard Tanev Alberts Rome Gragnani/ Connauton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 I disagree.It may be irrelevant but I am thinking about it so it is relevant.Surprise. Samuelsson led the Canucks in playoff scoring two years ago. Gragnani is a dud at this stage.Sulzer has proven to be a reliable veteran. Ehrhoff has Bieksa and GIllis to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 I disagree.It may be irrelevant but I am thinking about it so it is relevant.Surprise. Samuelsson led the Canucks in playoff scoring two years ago. Gragnani is a dud at this stage.Sulzer has proven to be a reliable veteran. Ehrhoff has Bieksa and GIllis to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Just think of Samuelsson's play in the LA season. Hopefullly he'll do well for Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 he should tryout as a forward next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 If Edler goes down & its a possibility (to replace some offense). Anyone else goes down & I'd rather see whichever of Ballard, Rome, or Alberts. Tanev is already locked in ahead of these players (maybe Ballard goes ahead of Tanev, but?). I'd also call up Connauton before playing Gragnani, especially for that offensive role. The Canucks have played him enough to attain the right to match contract offers for him in the offseason, so Tanev is back in tonight. Does anyone think he'll see significant time in the postseason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.