Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

So If Daniels Back What Should The Lines Look Like?


406281dylan

Recommended Posts

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows

Raymond - Kesler - Booth

Higgins - Pahlsson - Hansen

Weise - Malhotra - Bitz

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Edler - Salo

Ballard - Tanev

Put Higgins and Hansen back with Pahlsson. He didn't play well at all without Higgins and Hansen. Get at least two lines going (Sedin and Pahlsson).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still don't understand why people want to swap Tanev out of all our D men. Also Raymond is working hard on the back check going down to block shots, everyone knew he probably wasn't going to score, in my opinion he brings a lot more to the table right now than Booth who has a couple good hits, thats it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AMEX line could be our worst line ever.

Its 3 snipers on a line.

The only thing that happens when this line is on the ice is that they skate down left or right side, take a shot, then start chasing around. Not a single forward passes to another forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sedin-Sedin-Kes

Higgins-Lappy-Booth

Raymond-Pahlsson-Hansen

Kassian-Malhotra-Weise

We absolutely NEED to stock the first line :emot-parrot:

Bcuz Game 4 is do or die

we need to gamble it

give it a chance

break up the amex line!!!! MWAHAHAHAHAH :bigblush:

i think it'll work

Edler-Salo

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Ballard-Gragnani/Tanev

Edler's performance last game was UNACCEPTABLE

he coughed up the puck TOO many times

But heres the real problem.....

HE BASICALLY LOST US THE GAME BCUZ OF HIS RETARDED AND UNNECESSARY PENALTY IN THE LAST 2 MINUTES :picard:

He really needs to step up his game <_<

Luongo/Schneider

Goalie situation really depends on the next game

but IMO i think we should start Schneider in goal next game (4)

He has been rock-solid lately B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was my understanding they traded sulzer for gragnani, because he has powerplay making abilities. well we have an anemic pp , sowhy not see what hes got, , play him only if a pp comes into play, as many think he is a liability in his own end. he has 7 pts , in 9 playoff games, why not, what do we have to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It baffles me why we still haven't called up Reinprecht...

Veteran cup winner that can play on the fourth line, kill penalties, and is one of the Wolves best powerplay guys. For a team that is struggling to score goals, I don't know why we wouldn't look to add some more offence into the lineup. It's not like Malhotra is doing anything offensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...