ryder Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Not sure why there isn't more outrage on these boards. It may not have mattered as Quick played airtight, regardless here it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Aerosex Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 What's more outrageous is what sounds like that commentator's attempt at an Italian accent at the beginning of the video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightHawkSniper Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I don't see the pass, looks more like it hit him and came free a second later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haikara Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I don't see it =( got the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grapefruits Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Not sure why there isn't more outrage on these boards. It may not have mattered as Quick played airtight, regardless here it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etsen3 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 To me it looks like it just bounced off his arm, hard to tell though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryder Posted April 16, 2012 Author Share Posted April 16, 2012 50 seconds is your best look at it. I saw a better reply but i cant find it. not whining, just saying of all places i would have expected CDC to be outraged. like i said it may not have mattered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryder Posted April 16, 2012 Author Share Posted April 16, 2012 Penner hand pass to Kopitar. 25 to 11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj29 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 To me it looks like it just bounced off his arm, hard to tell though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjickwillkillyou Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I am more concerned with whether or not Brown is a Muppet. That could be a huge advantage if he is being all made out of stuffing and whatnot. No wonder he never gets hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrath_jason Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 meh. either way the Canucks lost. Time for game 4. They can still win this series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdeath Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 To me it looks like it just bounced off his arm, hard to tell though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryder Posted April 17, 2012 Author Share Posted April 17, 2012 fair enough, i figured it was worth pointing out. if someone has the other angle...it definitely looks intentional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlas=d Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 at 52-53 seconds if you watch it like 10 times you can see the puck hit the top of his glove or for arm and he directs it out. his jersey is black so its pretty hard to see exactly where it hits. but you can clearly see him push the puck with his for arm/ glove to the other la forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jougo Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 What's more outrageous is what sounds like that commentator's attempt at an Italian accent at the beginning of the video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Brown Burrows Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Not enough to call it off the goal IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahf149 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Meh, noref could see that, one guy said he had to watch it 10 times. I was more pissed off with what should have been a delay of game penalty when Richards sat on the puck in the last minute of play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Not enough to call it off the goal IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Brown Burrows Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 This is the problem with the NHL IMO. A rule is a rule and if they are called consistently and are properly enforced then maybe the players will know what is a legal play or not. I was trying to bring this up last night, but it was overlooked. It doesn't matter in the end because we just couldn't score, but this is a play that 4 on-ice officials missed which ultimately also leads to a 3-0 deficit that the Canucks will need to be really lucky to overcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Meh, noref could see that, one guy said he had to watch it 10 times. I was more pissed off with what should have been a delay of game penalty when Richards sat on the puck in the last minute of play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.