BeefJyrki21 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Watching the commentary in between periods of the Canucks-King games really made me lose respect for PJ Stock as an analyst/commentator. For two games now, even when the Canucks were clearly outplaying the kings, all he had were negative things to say about the Canucks. Even Ron Maclean and Bruce Budreau felt PJ's comments were unfair and came to the defense of the Canucks. It's also nice to see Ron being supportive of the Canucks recently. No idea why PJ dislikes the Canucks so much. He's such a tool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Oh no someone doesn't like my team! I am going to post about it on the internet, that'll teach 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cause=Time Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 What bugged me about Stock is that it sounded to me like he was advocating that some Canuck instigate a fight or go headhunting in response to the Brown hit on Sedin. This was essentially an elimination game - you don't potentially take a big penalty just to "get back" at the other team, or assert yourself. Earlier in the series, sure, but not when you are down 2-0 in a tie game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grapefruits Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Watching the commentary in between periods of the Canucks-King games really made me lose respect for PJ Stock as an analyst/commentator. For two games now, even when the Canucks were clearly outplaying the kings, all he had were negative things to say about the Canucks. Even Ron Maclean and Bruce Budreau felt PJ's comments were unfair and came to the defense of the Canucks. It's also nice to see Ron being supportive of the Canucks recently. No idea why PJ dislikes the Canucks so much. He's such a tool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Industrious1 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 His opinion doesn't offend me. However I will say I was surprised to see Ron Maclean come to the defense of the Canucks organization. I also found it interesting how Hrudey had nothing to say during that segment..perhaps his opinion differed from the more vocal and 'boisterous' Stock and Boudreau? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ṣpiderman Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Actually he was bang on last night. No one stepped up for Henrik. No one stepped up for Daniel either. If we are to not take penalties and hope for the power-play, why did we trade for Kassian? Why trade for all this toughness? It sure isn't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyzer Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 PJ's analysis of the game is just as good as he was playing the actual game. Not very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeefJyrki21 Posted April 16, 2012 Author Share Posted April 16, 2012 Actually he was bang on last night. No one stepped up for Henrik. No one stepped up for Daniel either. If we are to not take penalties and hope for the power-play, why did we trade for Kassian? Why trade for all this toughness? It sure isn't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs2016 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 He was only a fighter so you could say that it's his personality and career that made him say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry_Wilkins Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Actually he was bang on last night. No one stepped up for Henrik. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Brown Burrows Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spliced Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Pj Stock is Horrible. Some of these stations need to get a clue and realize just because you played in the NHL it doesn't make you a good analyst anymore than it makes you a good equipment manufacturer. Looks like you may have riled up some PJ Stock fan boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Peterson Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 A wimp taking tuff...sad really..."BALLS" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ṣpiderman Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 What were we supposed to do in that situation that would've helped any more? Go two men down for five minutes? Lose a key player (Bieksa, Burrows were on the ice, can't remember the others) the rest of the game? All when the score is 0-0? Pittsburgh tried that. Sure worked for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckfan91 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 PJ Stock is an ex-Bruin. thats why he has developed hate for the canucks. never had it before last years playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spyrocks Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 What bugged me about Stock is that it sounded to me like he was advocating that some Canuck instigate a fight or go headhunting in response to the Brown hit on Sedin. This was essentially an elimination game - you don't potentially take a big penalty just to "get back" at the other team, or assert yourself. Earlier in the series, sure, but not when you are down 2-0 in a tie game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 he was right though! our star player gets knocked out and all we do is chirp and give them a face wash. At least Carkner beat the sh*t out of boyle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANGO Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 PJ was a bad commentator long time before last night. What drives me nuts in all this is that these panels seem to glorify....Play-off hockey. Who ever wins this year, I hope they dont have to send some 4th line plug up to accept the cup becuase all their star players have concussions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty Walrus Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 What did he say that was wrong? Are you telling me there was nothing wrong with nobody stepping up to brown when he hit Henrik? And please stop comparing any sort of retaliation to the bertuzzi Incident and making excuses. This team is soft and it's hurting the team more than we think it does. We are one of the softest teams in the league and our players get abused and disrespected consistently. If any team needs an enforcer to send out a message it is the Canucks. We are a laughing stock around the league in regards to protecting our players. When Orr and macintyre was on waivers this season we should of picked one of them up for half the salary. We do what most teams do and that is to keep an enforcer in the minors and call him up when we need him. And don't tell me that we dont need 4th liners that can't play, because Orr can't play the 3 minutes that kassian did? Most Canucks fans are trying to find any way to defend this team in regards to not needing a tough guy on the team. can you honestly look around the league and at all the teams and not think that the one team that needs a tough guy the most like Orr is the Canucks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rounoush Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Wait a minute. You HAD respect for PJ Stock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.