Primal Optimist Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Now lets stop whining and sniffing and get to the business of winning hockey games by putting more biscuits on the basket than anyone else in the sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luongotv Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 I for one love this lineup for two reasons. 1. Daniel Sedin and Henrik Sedin.... Says it all 2. Pahlsson on 4th line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacklabel Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Perfect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
406281dylan Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 I find Lappy has just outplayed Pahlsson completly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil HD Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 I'm feeling good about all of these pairings and lines except the Ballard-Bieksa one. Aren't both of them roving defensemen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Yes! Never thought of Raymond-Lapierre-Hansen before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoaltenderInterference Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Please don't Ballard and Bieksa together. That's a disaster waiting to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucksbiggestfan Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 I would much rather have Ballard-Edler Bieksa- Alberts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Changes: -Cory As #1 -Bieksa with Hamhuis -.......try Kelser as a winger because its pretty obvious he's not the passing type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CytotoxicCD8TLymphocyte Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Looks good! Defence looks great Two things come to mind tho: 1. Booth on his off wing is absolutely useless at passing he needs to be split up from kes I'd suggest Sedins/bur ---- higgins kesler hansen ---- booth pahls lappy --- ____ malhotra kassian 2. Raymond needs to be a healthy scratch.. he bring everyone down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
406281dylan Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Raymond Lapierre Hansen= perfect maybe vigneault will do this tommorow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Pahlsson >>> Lapierre in shutdown role Lapierre >>> Pahlsson in hitting and crashing role So Pahlsson = 3rd line C, Lapierre = 4th line C And the D-pairings? Come on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Carell Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Daniel Sedin - Henrik Sedin - Burrows Higgins - Ryan Kesler - David Booth Raymond - Pahlsson - Hansen Lapierre - Malhotra - Kassian I'm sorry, but Pahlsson was brought in here as a checking center, and I believe he's been doing well. While Lapierre has been good, he's more of an energy player so should be on the 4th line. But, if Daniel Sedin happens to not play: Lapierre - Henrik Sedin - Burrows Higgins - Kesler - Booth Raymond - Pahlsson - Hansen Ebbett - Malhotra - Kassian In this case Lapierre moves up to the first line because he did really well with Henrik and Burrows when Daniel was gone near the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FattieAcid Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 LETS JUST GO BACK TO THE LINEUP WE HAD ON OPENING DAY OF THE SEASON. with the changes too the players we lost and got. GO CANUCKS GO! WE CAN ANTI SWEEP THEM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Honestly, it doesn't matter what pairings you put out there if our best players don't step it up and put the puck in the net. We have the personnel to get it done no matter who's playing together. It's all about execution and finish though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1nf1n1ty Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 I forone cannot get behind your lineup. Sedin-Sedin-Booth Lappy-Kesler-Burrows HIggens-Pahlsson-Hansen Raymond-Malhotra-Kassian Hamhuis-Edler Bieksa-Salo Ballard-Tanev Schneider Luongo This is what i want to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckjets Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Perfect lineup but the forth line needs to be given more minutes then they have been and give Kassian more than three minutes a game to make an impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primal Optimist Posted April 17, 2012 Author Share Posted April 17, 2012 I know ballard. bieksa is a risky combo, but really: what have got to lose now? the only goals scored with the more traditional lines have been by the Kings. Tanev and Ballard are the only two Dmen who are not in the minus' five on five. Oddly, while I was looking at the stats, Kassian is the only player we have who is plus 1, all the rest are at zero or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossram Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Ballard and Bieksa....No thanks. Disaster. And Pahlsson can't play the wing. He has never played the wing and doesn't know how. Sedin - Sedin - Burrows Higgins - Kesler - Booth Raymond - Lapierre - Hansen Malhotra - Pahlsson - Weise Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Salo Ballard - Tanev For me, I like Weise because he is better the Kassian defensively and can still play physical. The defense pairings are the most stable ones we have. We have to use them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danthecanucksfan Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 bieksa and hamhuis plus Ballard and tanev must be together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.