OlyCanucks Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 I'd like to see AV gone. Just with his treatment of Ballard and young players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 As long as we throw in Mason Raymond.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 If we lose this series, I can almost guarantee AV will be gone. As far as I'm concerned he's run his course as the Canucks head coach. It's time for a change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkoshack Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 enough said.. HE's not leaving!... You think that after 6 years of playoff hockey, 2 PT in a row, he'd be fired? The only way he'd leave is if he quits and decides to retire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkoshack Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Mark Crawford PLZ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Why even start this thread? OP you're saying that you don't think its over and that we still have a chance, but you're starting threads like its over already.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
: } Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 AV or RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 With 3 teams in the previous history of the NHL coming back from 3-0, it's over. As far as AV, who knows, but MG will need to make some serious decisions. This off season will be huge in the way of the future of the franchise. Personally, I could see AV ousted and someone brought in just to shake the dust off... Someone fiery, the opposite of AV, not sure who is out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryten Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 And Keith Ballard. Done deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Save Luongo!!! Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 torts, lol I wish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Ballard has been our best defenceman this playoffs. New coach means new system, we just might find out what we truly have in him during the regular season. I really appreciate what AV has done for this team but there is currently a problem and firing him is the easiest fix as far as the team is concerned. I do believe that we will see a new coach next season and I hope the replacement will be someone I like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetpotato Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 WAYNE GRETZKY!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alldaynucksfan11 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Craig McTavish. i cant stand it when the team is getting rocked and coach V is just standing there with his gum in his mouth and not even saying anything to the players. he doesnt even yell at them or motivate them at all. and i think we need a coach who will do that, like philly's laviolette or rangers' torts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IwantGDiduc! Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Hi guys, First off, I'd like to start by saying I am a firm supporter of AV and do not want him to be fired, but we all have to realize it is a realistic, if not probable outcome if we lose this series. I was Just wondering who you guys think will replace AV if he is fired, I'm not very knowledgeable about the coaching market at the moment... Do you guys think that Rick Bowness or Newell brown will take over, or Craig McTavish??? Or do you think if we get a new coach he will be from outside the current organization? if so who do you think it could be? once again I want to repeat that I dont think this series is over, especially should Danny come back for game 4, nor do I want Vigneault to be fired. I say this again because I know that some of CDC's users aren't the most thorough readers.... Happy Posting! -JGM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Pat Quinn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucksbiggestfan Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 TREVOR LINDEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryten Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 It's a good point about a new coach, new system, maybe Ballard will be better under both of those. But as of now, he's played 2 bad seasons for the Canucks. He's payed as a top 4 d-man, and has yet to be used as one. He can't eat big minutes, resultantly, Edler/Hammer/Juice have to eat ridiculous minutes to compensate. This series 'chance wise', Ballard has not been good in this series. He's been on the ice for more 'chances against' than 'chances for' at even strength. Edler, Bieksa, Hamhuis and Tanev have all been better at even strength than Ballard. Additionally, he's been eaten up at even strength while he's playing the most sheltered minutes. I think he'll be replaced by Rome in game 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryten Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 TREVOR LINDEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Garret's moustache Posted April 17, 2012 Author Share Posted April 17, 2012 The owner of your moustache! (Yes, I jest.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Ballard is very capable of eating big minutes, it's just he is considered fifth on the depth chart and not everyone can get the 20+ minutes a night. I really don't like any bleacher report advanced stats of any kind because they give absolutely NO valid insight into a hockey player's value. Those "chances against" that I witnessed were of no fault of Ballard's, so why do you count them against him? Also he has not played "sheltered minutes" (I also don't like that term at all). There is no such thing as sheltered minutes, especially during the playoffs. What I look for is how well he plays his position, and compared to every other Canuck dman, he was the most effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.