crime911 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 DArn it I have Human Anatomy EXAM... I watched last 3 games and they lost.. Now I am not watching it because they will win this time.. But its good to hear Danny skating on ice.. LA get ready to for some TWIN action. peace out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamspuzzum Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 "If" they can win tonight, then they have a legit chance. That 4th win is always the hardest. LA hasn't got the 4th win since 2001, and they've never swept a series in their entire history. LA "is" beatable. First guy I'd focus on... Doughty.. he loooks like he's going to snap given the right oportunity. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrath_jason Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 EPIC COMEBACK.....4 STRAIGHT, BABY! HISTORY WILL BE MADE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucks_Fan07 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 The rule clearly states that you need to win 4 out of 7 games you play. Probability for us to win is lower compared to LA but that doesn't mean Canucks will surely lose. We don't "deserve" to win? What kind of f***ed up logic is that?? So LA "deserves" to win in your mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck_Pride Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 He sad he is a game time decision, but he expects to play tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Peterson Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Out played LA two out of three games...a hot goalie does not make a team a great team, just a team on the brink of failure..."BALLS" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edler0023 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 If he plays, I hope he has one helluva game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthANGER Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Go cheer for another team then, We have enough bandwagoner's here already.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadsbaggedinbaghdad Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 For some reason, I'm feeling really positive about tonight's game. Only three teams have ever come back to actually win after being down 3 - 0 in the playoffs. Leafs in 1942, Islanders in 1975 and the Flyers in 2010. Chicago came back last year after being down 3 - 0 to the nucks (sixth team in NHL history to force a seventh game after being down 3 - 0). But they didn't win. We did. I know these are pretty wicked odds but who's to say it can't be done. All I can say is Go Canucks Go. As p****ed off as I am that we're down 3 - 0, I'm looking forward to the game and hope they pound the hell out of LA. Hopefully, Daniel will appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthANGER Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 The rule clearly states that you need to win 4 out of 7 games you play. Probability for us to win is lower compared to LA but that doesn't mean Canucks will surely lose. We don't "deserve" to win? What kind of f***ed up logic is that?? So LA "deserves" to win in your mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tru_Knyte Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamspuzzum Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 For some reason, I'm feeling really positive about tonight's game. Only three teams have ever come back to actually win after being down 3 - 0 in the playoffs. Leafs in 1942, Islanders in 1975 and the Flyers in 2010. Chicago came back last year after being down 3 - 0 to the nucks (sixth team in NHL history to force a seventh game after being down 3 - 0). But they didn't win. We did. I know these are pretty wicked odds but who's to say it can't be done. All I can say is Go Canucks Go. As p****ed off as I am that we're down 3 - 0, I'm looking forward to the game and hope they pound the hell out of LA. Hopefully, Daniel will appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunPryde Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Don't forget the 2011 Boston Bruins... came back from 0-3 in first round, to go all the way to the parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lyla Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 On the strength of their play, yes, the L.A. Kings do deserve to win! It doesn't make me any less of a fan than you by feeling that way! I am pissed off about the boys' performance and i hope AV told them the same things that i have been saying because they need a wake up call just like some of you lemmings who would follow everyone else off the cliff "believing" that you would somehow land softly although the facts clearly show you will go splat when you hit the ground. GTFO! I am no less a fan than anyone else here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthANGER Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 A fan supports their team and what you are doing is the opposite. I understand your being realistic but if you are a fan you should be supporting them and hope for a better result. It sounds like you just want them to not even play and get on the next airplane home. Get your priorities straight. I'm guessing you just support the team when their winning and playing well. That's called a bandwagon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nux4lyfe Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I am hardly a bandwagon fan. I will watch every minute of the game, i will be rooting for them to win, but it sure as hell doesn't mean im going to blindly follow all you lemmings who are predicting a comeback, saying you believe and all that other jazz off of the cliff. It's all rhetoric as far as i am concerned. I am just being realistic and basing my opinion on what i have seen. I can only state the facts based off of what i have seen to this point. What we have seen to this point points to a first round exit. It's that simple GTFO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthANGER Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Ni ish Sherlock! We all know the circumstances and don't need fairweather 'fans' like yourself reminding us every 2 mins..there's a saying that goes ' if you weren't there for my struggles don't expect to be there for my success' , and you can GTFO now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamspuzzum Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 No, it was 2-0 , not 3-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamspuzzum Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Think what you want... I never said i don't support the team at all. Did you see anywhere in my posts where i clearly state that i "dont support this team"? No! I dont think so! If i was at the game tonight i would be in my Canucks jersey and be screaming with the rest of the huge contingent of Canucks fans! What i am doing is stating the facts. This team has not done a whole lot right from the get go anf are now in the bottomless 3-0 pit. I am just a harsh critic and i expect nothing but the best from my team. This team has not given their best and should be ashamed of themselves. I am telling it like it is. That is what is wrong with some of you.. You are unable to handle people like me telling it like it is.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthANGER Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Harsh critic.. or friggin' pessimist? There's a difference. Some just live for the opportunity to criticize.. while others look at the actual picture. LA's been better?? Other than game 1, the 'Nucks "have" outplayed the Kings.. flat out. The ONLY reason LA's even in this... Jonathan Quick. It's basically Vancouver Canucks vs Jonathan Quick.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.