Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Av And Coaching Issues Thread


  • Please log in to reply
163 replies to this topic

#61 coolboarder

coolboarder

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 491 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 03

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:29 PM

It is up to Mike Gillis to decide what to do with the coaching. AV did a good job over the season but he comes up short this year. As a fan perspective, AV needs to go for following reasons: he failed to adjust some strategy that the Kings threw at them. Sure, the Kings is stingy defensive but when the Kings' pressure in their offensive zone is alarming, especially the 4th line over and over at home needs to be addressed immediately. AV failed to do that. A good coach will make notes when the opponents 4th line is buzzing, he needs to counter with some different strategies to defuse the 4th line. It is not just the strategies involved but some lack of motivation on the first two games, did them in. I personally felt that there are some good coaches that might be available out there, the trick is that they need to find a right personality of a coach to coach the team. Mac T is not going to cut it. I am sure that the GM will find the right coach. I have seen the players have tuned AV out a few times during the season and I felt that even they were winning the game, they were majority of 1-goal games, even during their "slump" that they never have gotten out of.

I don't want any "recycled" coach on this team because they were hired and fired by other teams before and even if they hire that coach, why would we think he will change his ways to prove himself a good coach when his tactics and strategies have failed before?

Now, I have stated my case that GM Mike Gillis really need to take his time to evaluate the overall structure of this team and that includes the coach staff on this team and analysis the questions what this team needs of a coach. Does this team needs a motivator but lacks good game plan, or a passive coach, or an emotional coach or a thinker coach with a right buttons to push and to motivate the team?

If we let go AV, will we repeat as a president trophy winner, 3-peat or if we keep AV, we might have a chance to get 3-peat President Trophy winner and a weaker opponents for a change rather than Chicago or LA. It seems strange that the Canucks have had to go and face a stronger team in the playoffs as a 8th seed. Do we give AV another chance? We will never know what will happen in the future but the right buttons need to be pushed correctly and make moves that is necessary to keep this team a contender for years to come, even Sedins get old and decline as they ages years from now. I think that this "off-season" is the key and the turning point whether they will finally get over the hump as a cup winner in the near future. Gillis can't afford to make a series of mistakes otherwise, the goal of the cup winner might not come for the near future. I view this season as a great learning tool for their future but needs to apply correctly to gain better experiences.

Perhaps, we might not get a slow start next year as we will look forward with the goaltending situation and the Luongo's slow start is the key to the 2012-13 season with right coaching personnel on the team. Look forward to the next season already, I am curious what GM will do in the next few weeks.
  • 0

#62 lundhead

lundhead

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:31 PM

That was brutal, this is why everyone hates us...we lost the series on an attempted dive by Hamhuis and the fans start screaming "refs you suck!"? (or was it "Hamhuis sucks?", either way that was disgraceful).. And now we immediately call for a coaching change? How about, maybe our players suck?

I think it's time we take a strong look at this organization from the top down...i hate to say it but maybe there's something to what people are saying w.r.t. maybe this team takes too many dives. They were gutless out there.

Edited by lundhead, 22 April 2012 - 09:33 PM.

  • 2

#63 Lemieux

Lemieux

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 781 posts
  • Joined: 02-February 04

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:34 PM

They absolutely got out coached in the special teams. They reverted back to the man-to-man strategy in the PK. Look at how LA does it. They get three guys to the boards and try to get the puck. The guy who's covering the point should come down low to assist with the puck battle if there's an opening. Instead, we often have flat footed guys wandering around, like Todd Bertuzzi.

The other team simply doesn't let the other team have too much control. In this day and age, you can't play the 4-man box. That's for the 1990s.
  • 0
This signature is not blank.

#64 VancityBeast

VancityBeast

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 94 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:34 PM

The whole coaching team need to be fired.

Why?

It took them over 20 games to figure out that they needed to fix their pathetic power-play strategy. We could have easily won Game 1 and Game 2 if we had taken advantage of our power-plays even before the playoff started.
  • 0
Posted Image

#65 CaNuCkSLoUiE23

CaNuCkSLoUiE23

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,347 posts
  • Joined: 01-November 09

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:36 PM

I'm sick and tired of the chip and charge play. We have such skilled guys, but they just HAVE to dump the puck in and chase after it.

AV.....FIRED.
  • 2

#66 nuck luck

nuck luck

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 499 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 11

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:38 PM

Wow. AV is STAYING, did he not just pass Mark Crawford this year for most wins, in a much shorter time frame? Like common! AV can't control the players actions, he just creates the system, which is a VERY GOOD system if you ask me. The problem in my mind is the GM, if he wants to give this team a CHANCE at winning the cup, we need someone to help the second line (cough * Hodgson * cough). And since we don't have that someone right now, IMO we need:

- To go after someone like St. Louis, or Parise to solidify our top 6. Bottom six is great in my mind.
- Decide whether Ballard is staying or not (considering he is taking up a lot of cap space). If he's staying, give him the ice time he deserves. Pair him with Bieksa or Edler. If he isn't, trade him so we can sign a Top 4 defencemen.
- Sign Kassian to some sort of 2-way contract, and try him out during the pre-season. If he looks lost, put him in the minors for another year until he starts gaining consistency, than call him up every now and then.
- Decide which prospects we want to call up next season (ahead of time), and sign them to 2-way contracts accordingly.
- Resign Burrows and Edler!!! Do not let them walk MG! I swear to God!


I think your blaming the wrong guy here... MG has done more for this team than anyone could have imagined. MG wants a winner and he is giving this team and the key people, the coach, everything they need at their disposal to win.

A defensive 3rd line is AV's dream line.... that's what he wanted last year with Manny until he got injured. I'm sure AV went to MG to discuss Coho and his complaints.... otherwise, the trade wouldn't have happened so quick.

Remember, AV will only play his favorites regardless of who MG brings in...
  • 2

#67 nucks115

nucks115

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 55 posts
  • Joined: 13-April 10

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:41 PM

he needs to go. eventhough he has been an amazing coach for the canucks,
its time for a change.
  • 0

#68 brownky

brownky

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,730 posts
  • Joined: 13-July 06

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:42 PM

At last.

Vindication.

I was right when he was hired, I'm still right. He should not be the coach of the Vancouver Canucks.

He *isn't* a great coach. He's an above average coach at best (and I would argue 'average') who has had absolutely delightful talent at his disposal. It's been shown series after series when a 'coaching duel' happens, AV comes out as the loser.

Bring in someone who will actually coach the team, as opposed to stand there waving an arm at the ref while chewing 40 packs of gum.

Now I can finally cheer for this team again. It's been a long time.
  • 3

#69 CaNuCkSLoUiE23

CaNuCkSLoUiE23

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,347 posts
  • Joined: 01-November 09

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:44 PM

*
POPULAR

Also, Pahlsson was brought here to shutdown players in the playoffs. AV didn't even bother putting Pahlsson's line against the Kopitar line or the Richards line.
  • 6

#70 snucks

snucks

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,701 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 03

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:48 PM

The problem was not only Hodgson, but Pahlsson. You already had two Selke calibre centers in Malhotra and Kesler who could shut down any line. Then you get a guy with absolutely no offense to speak of. So basically, you are left with 3 non-scoring lines. When Sedin went down, the last scoring line also disappeared.

Michael Gillis has made many questionable calls with Sundin, Grabner, Hodgson, Luongo (giving him that big fat contract).


Maybe Aquilini will get rid of Gillis too. Its very difficult to win a cup if your a Canadian team remember the league wants to grow in the states. The type of team here was pounded by Boston last yr but still managed to play 7 game final . This yr one of our top players was the victim of a cowardly elbow to the head there was no motivation from that. It was a fast skilled team that just couldn't take the rough stuff. Edler stopped hitting but made mistake after mistake. Salo couldn't save the day tonight because he was already skating to the bench for a change. There clearly should have been a penalty on the trip to Hamhuis which helped create the winning goal tonight. Its a bunch of things that went wrong and the manager, coach , and quite a few of the players couldn't handle it this year. Kessler hasn't been himself since the hip surgery, Raymond his back surgery.

The Boston series last year should have made things painfully obvious but Gillis failed to re build. Problem is they got by enough to win the Presidents trophy. AV I think overthought things after the Keith hit. He juggled things to much particularly tonight.LA just kept pounding them and the Canuck D were the goats on the 2 goals. They said the Canucks had depth it sure didn't seem that way under AV and Gillis.
  • 0

#71 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,132 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:48 PM

.

Edited by Tortorella's_Rant, 22 April 2012 - 09:49 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#72 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,132 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:49 PM

It is up to Mike Gillis to decide what to do with the coaching. AV did a good job over the season but he comes up short this year. As a fan perspective, AV needs to go for following reasons: he failed to adjust some strategy that the Kings threw at them. Sure, the Kings is stingy defensive but when the Kings' pressure in their offensive zone is alarming, especially the 4th line over and over at home needs to be addressed immediately. AV failed to do that. A good coach will make notes when the opponents 4th line is buzzing, he needs to counter with some different strategies to defuse the 4th line. It is not just the strategies involved but some lack of motivation on the first two games, did them in. I personally felt that there are some good coaches that might be available out there, the trick is that they need to find a right personality of a coach to coach the team. Mac T is not going to cut it. I am sure that the GM will find the right coach. I have seen the players have tuned AV out a few times during the season and I felt that even they were winning the game, they were majority of 1-goal games, even during their "slump" that they never have gotten out of.

I don't want any "recycled" coach on this team because they were hired and fired by other teams before and even if they hire that coach, why would we think he will change his ways to prove himself a good coach when his tactics and strategies have failed before?

Now, I have stated my case that GM Mike Gillis really need to take his time to evaluate the overall structure of this team and that includes the coach staff on this team and analysis the questions what this team needs of a coach. Does this team needs a motivator but lacks good game plan, or a passive coach, or an emotional coach or a thinker coach with a right buttons to push and to motivate the team?

If we let go AV, will we repeat as a president trophy winner, 3-peat or if we keep AV, we might have a chance to get 3-peat President Trophy winner and a weaker opponents for a change rather than Chicago or LA. It seems strange that the Canucks have had to go and face a stronger team in the playoffs as a 8th seed. Do we give AV another chance? We will never know what will happen in the future but the right buttons need to be pushed correctly and make moves that is necessary to keep this team a contender for years to come, even Sedins get old and decline as they ages years from now. I think that this "off-season" is the key and the turning point whether they will finally get over the hump as a cup winner in the near future. Gillis can't afford to make a series of mistakes otherwise, the goal of the cup winner might not come for the near future. I view this season as a great learning tool for their future but needs to apply correctly to gain better experiences.

Perhaps, we might not get a slow start next year as we will look forward with the goaltending situation and the Luongo's slow start is the key to the 2012-13 season with right coaching personnel on the team. Look forward to the next season already, I am curious what GM will do in the next few weeks.


I think AV needs to go. I like AV, and this wasn't entirely his fault, but he had zero solutions to the Kings game plan. This is the same core that we've had for four years now going back to the first series against Chicago.

There has been nothing to show for it. It's NOT working with what we have. Changes need to be made and he's the easiest to replace.

We cannot just stand pat like the Sharks have for the most part and just pray that it works out one day.
  • 0
Posted Image

#73 Nuckslosingafan

Nuckslosingafan

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 10

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:51 PM

YEP, Vigs has to go - was pretty clear when he traded away Erhoff and Torres (which I know nucks woulda told him to watch his hits had he being a canuck still - because of his hit last year). Then he trades away Hodgson for 2 players that didn't even factor in the playoffs (Pahlsson - phfff - we lost Hodgson's goals in that one - Hodgeson was on a role before the trade). I was mad at this trade, if anyone should have gone, it should have being Raymond.

Love Schneiders play - but to keep him another year simply means "confidence" isn't 100% in Luongo - what does that say to a guy - great goaltenders of the past went all the way!

Playing Luo in Boston when he knew Luo didn't do well in Boston - leaving the 4th line in the game when the 4th line kept taking all those penalties.

Leaving the 2 greatest goalscorers on the bench during the shootouts (Crosby didn't do well either, but the Penguins coach kept sending him out and he eventually began to score) - what does that say to the Sedins?

Ballard, Hamhuis, Laps, Maholtra, Weis, Pahlsson, Salo and Hansen have to go.

And, the Sedins need a big, tough "CANADIAN" player with them that can skate and make plays - someone that can hit and take a hit - like Byfulien cleared the way for the Hawks in their Stanley Cup win - after all, the final came down to if Pronger could stop him. The Sedins make anyone look good, they need a big guy like that - where the other teams will tremble when they see that line coming. Kassian first shifts with the Sedins - he slammed the other team's player with the puck into the board and the Sedins picked up the puck and went in on a two-on-one.

Hats off to the Canucks that stood up for teammates, but when it comes down to sustained toughness, the Canucks just don't have that.

Defence was a problem all year - I mean - take a look at all those games where the goaltenders took more than 30 shots on goal, over 40 several times - where was the "D"? Tonights goal against, all 3 canucks in front of the goal did not take Richardson out - had the put him on his behind, he wouldn't have scored - they were so busy trying to get their sticks on the puck - knock the guy down and take the penalty - the canucks were awesome at killing penalties - gotta take that chance.

You don't win back-to-back Pres. Trophy and bow out like that: bad last year and even worse this year.

Where was Kesler - was he hurt - the only time he became a threat was when he took the puck to the net, but most of the time it took his shots from way out above the face-off circles.

vigneault has to go. If the LA coach can get the best out of his players and Hitchcock can do what he's doing right now - vigneault isn't doing all he can, or he is and it just isn't enough!

"VIGNEAULT HAS TO GO!!!!!!!"
  • 1

#74 We Are All Cucks

We Are All Cucks

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined: 22-February 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:04 PM

Interesting idea, Arniel did a great job with Manitoba, and at least he would be familiar with some of the players and vice versa.

Although guys like Schroeder didn't do well under Arniel. MacT may be a better option, with Arniel going to Chicago.


Hmmm. I hadn't thought of it that way. Arniel could be a replacement for MacT if he were to make the jump up. I'm just not sure I'd like to see MacT up here.

Therein lies the issue of firing AV willy nilly. Who can replace him that is truly that much better? AV is a great coach, just has had his time worn out here. Do you go about firing a good coach that clearly isn't working to get a decent coach that might? Seems like a bad move.
Almost like trading a rookie that is producing for a rookie that might...
  • 0

#75 We Are All Cucks

We Are All Cucks

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined: 22-February 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:07 PM

Gees! Slow connection speed = double post.

Edited by We Are All Cucks, 22 April 2012 - 10:14 PM.

  • 0

#76 Richowl

Richowl

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined: 25-March 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:10 PM

Although I like AV, his past decisions have been really confusing for us, the fans. Even IF he knows something we don't during their practices, his changes never lead to better results! How does that make the fans think of him?

For example:

1. He's constantly playing Raymond and Rome when they should be benched a long time ago during the season.
2. AMEX Line were on fire for a few games. Next game, Higgins gets moved down to the 3rd line. wtf?
3. D. Sedin was injured and the 14-33-40 line was formed. They win 8 straight games before the season ends. The playoff starts and he breaks that line. (Doesn't matter if we were playing against playoff-contenders or not)
4. He experiments with D-lines even DURING the playoffs.
5. (may or may not apply) He's too passive on the bench
6. PP was a freaken mess (not entirely his fault)
7. Last season, he kept benching Ballard, and then puts him on the top D-line the next game. wtf?
8. Also last season, he refused to play Schneider when Luongo was choking until it was late into the Playoff series (Game 6?)

As for MG, I think he will stay. I'm sure we were surprised with a few decisions he's made, but I'm not sure he could have done anything about it. For example:

1. Letting Ehrhoff go and not having any defense to replace him
2. Kind of like #1, except it's surprising to know the D was the same after trade deadline... exception is Gragnani who was a non-factor
3. Not getting more offensive touch... maybe he expected too much from Booth (?)
4. Trading Hodgson for someone who doesn't help during THIS year's playoff. (because I thought we wanted to win NOW?)
5. Following #4, it's obvious Kassian wasn't ready to be a power forward this year. This is his very first NHL season is it not?
  • 1

#77 skyfall

skyfall

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 940 posts
  • Joined: 16-November 09

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:23 PM

From watching other teams in the playoffs and reading articles about new school coaches like Hitchcock and Paul maclean I really feel like AV has been lagging.

I feel like a lot of AV supporters follow in the old school coaching footsteps so things like not making adjustments, talking to your players, and staying quiet are seen as ok. However, it seems like there is eithe a lack of direction at times or the wrong direction.

Very few times over AV's entire tenure did I feel the Canucks were outright robbed. A lot of losses are from high energy, low percentage plays based on an inflexible system.
  • 0

#78 Grape

Grape

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,354 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 11

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:23 PM

Just Bowness and Brown
  • 0

mj761l.jpg0007.gif0007.gif0007.gif0007.gif  

Signature Credit to Vintage Canuck!

 

Don't Click!


#79 WeDreamOfStanley

WeDreamOfStanley

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 369 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:31 PM

YEP, Vigs has to go - was pretty clear when he traded away Erhoff and Torres (which I know nucks woulda told him to watch his hits had he being a canuck still - because of his hit last year). Then he trades away Hodgson for 2 players that didn't even factor in the playoffs (Pahlsson - phfff - we lost Hodgson's goals in that one - Hodgeson was on a role before the trade). I was mad at this trade, if anyone should have gone, it should have being Raymond.



You do realize AV isn't the one making these trades or letting guys sign elsewhere right? That falls on MG
  • 0

#80 chilliwiggins

chilliwiggins

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined: 03-March 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:31 PM

av never used gm's picks much, ie gragnani who last year had 7 points in 9 playoff games , kassian scratched final game, reinprecht never got the call. i think thats it for av and company, pretty stagnant and predictable. ted nolan and mc tavish behind the bench
  • 0

#81 surrealneil88

surrealneil88

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Joined: 13-May 09

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:34 PM

I think the Canucks need a coach who is willing to use some of our younger talent. I see young guys getting time all over the place but AV, who is a great coach imho, always felt like he didn't have trust for the young guys. Kassian never really got any time and we all know the hodgson situation. Lets get a coach who can work some younger talent into the lineup.
  • 1

#82 TheNational Pro

TheNational Pro

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 500 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 09

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:35 PM

FIRE HIM!!!! get crawford back in there, looks like he knows what he's doing on TSN board haha
  • 0



Check out my video's on youtube at - http://www.youtube.c...ser/NationalPro

#83 Remy

Remy

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:40 PM

YEP, Vigs has to go - was pretty clear when he traded away Erhoff and Torres (which I know nucks woulda told him to watch his hits had he being a canuck still - because of his hit last year). Then he trades away Hodgson for 2 players that didn't even factor in the playoffs (Pahlsson - phfff - we lost Hodgson's goals in that one - Hodgeson was on a role before the trade). I was mad at this trade, if anyone should have gone, it should have being Raymond.

Ballard, Hamhuis, Laps, Maholtra, Weis, Pahlsson, Salo and Hansen have to go.


Wait a minute ... AV traded those guys away? Damnit, and right under our general manager's nose!

Also, you want to get rid of Hamhuis?! The others, well, you can make at least a half-ass attempt at reasoning ... but Hamhuis?
  • 0

#84 Muse

Muse

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 196 posts
  • Joined: 09-July 10

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:43 PM

Can we hire Patrick Roy
  • 0

#85 Ocular Patdown

Ocular Patdown

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,661 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 05

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:44 PM

Wow. AV is STAYING, did he not just pass Mark Crawford this year for most wins, in a much shorter time frame? Like common! AV can't control the players actions, he just creates the system, which is a VERY GOOD system if you ask me. The problem in my mind is the GM, if he wants to give this team a CHANCE at winning the cup, we need someone to help the second line (cough * Hodgson * cough). And since we don't have that someone right now, IMO we need:

- To go after someone like St. Louis, or Parise to solidify our top 6. Bottom six is great in my mind.
- Decide whether Ballard is staying or not (considering he is taking up a lot of cap space). If he's staying, give him the ice time he deserves. Pair him with Bieksa or Edler. If he isn't, trade him so we can sign a Top 4 defencemen.
- Sign Kassian to some sort of 2-way contract, and try him out during the pre-season. If he looks lost, put him in the minors for another year until he starts gaining consistency, than call him up every now and then.
- Decide which prospects we want to call up next season (ahead of time), and sign them to 2-way contracts accordingly.
- Resign Burrows and Edler!!! Do not let them walk MG! I swear to God!


Do you even know what you're talking about? Wow.
1. It was AV that wanted to get rid of Hodgson. Not Gillis. AV pushed for a more defensive 3rd Line.

2. Kassian is already signed to a two way contract. He's on his ELC.

3. The canucks prospects (if already playing for the wolves) are already on two way contracts.
  • 0

#86 jigsaw99

jigsaw99

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,258 posts
  • Joined: 06-April 10

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:49 PM

I saw alot of players that are capable of playing good but are playing their worse hockey of the year this playoffs. Edler, Kesler, Higgins, Booth, Burrows. That's a major coaching issue if we cannot turn your players around in a span of 5 games. Its not just these guys had 1 or 2 bad games. It was the whole series and there was no adjustments made nothing! AV was once again out coached. what's new?
  • 0

#87 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,132 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:54 PM

Although I like AV, his past decisions have been really confusing for us, the fans. Even IF he knows something we don't during their practices, his changes never lead to better results! How does that make the fans think of him?

For example:

1. He's constantly playing Raymond and Rome when they should be benched a long time ago during the season.
2. AMEX Line were on fire for a few games. Next game, Higgins gets moved down to the 3rd line. wtf?
3. D. Sedin was injured and the 14-33-40 line was formed. They win 8 straight games before the season ends. The playoff starts and he breaks that line. (Doesn't matter if we were playing against playoff-contenders or not)
4. He experiments with D-lines even DURING the playoffs.
5. (may or may not apply) He's too passive on the bench
6. PP was a freaken mess (not entirely his fault)
7. Last season, he kept benching Ballard, and then puts him on the top D-line the next game. wtf?
8. Also last season, he refused to play Schneider when Luongo was choking until it was late into the Playoff series (Game 6?)

As for MG, I think he will stay. I'm sure we were surprised with a few decisions he's made, but I'm not sure he could have done anything about it. For example:

1. Letting Ehrhoff go and not having any defense to replace him
2. Kind of like #1, except it's surprising to know the D was the same after trade deadline... exception is Gragnani who was a non-factor
3. Not getting more offensive touch... maybe he expected too much from Booth (?)
4. Trading Hodgson for someone who doesn't help during THIS year's playoff. (because I thought we wanted to win NOW?)
5. Following #4, it's obvious Kassian wasn't ready to be a power forward this year. This is his very first NHL season is it not?


One thing I've noticed is the team's ability to generate opportunities from within. I've noticed this watching the game and the NHL.com shot chart confirms this. We were better in the first two games but as the series progressed, it gets worse. Many of the shots are from the blueline and from along the boards with little to no traffic in front. This can also explain the goal scoring problem. How do you score goals? By getting to the net, by getting your shots through, by generating quality shots. There was a lack of quality shots, a lack of rebounds and secondary opportunities. It was one shot and out. One shot from the perimeter and blocked or quickly turned away by Quick and the play was stopped in its tracks. This is one of the biggest problems we had against the Bruins, aside from our mounting injuries --- a lack of quality chances. A lack of quality shots. A failure to get into the center of the ice.

CBC also showed a graphic the other night of the Canucks shot game from game 3 in the second period, I believe. Majority of those shots are from the perimeter. Again, backing up my point.

I'm not sure if it's the players themselves, the coaching, or a combo of both. But what I said above is evident. Game four was better, two of the three goals we had men buzzing around Quick/in front of him blocking his vision. You can shoot ALL day long from the outside and you'll never score without distractions, and even then it may not be enough.
  • 0
Posted Image

#88 jigsaw99

jigsaw99

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,258 posts
  • Joined: 06-April 10

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:11 PM

Canucks this off season:


  • 0

#89 AppleJack

AppleJack

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,361 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 12

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:13 PM

His time is over, the team needs a new voice and ideas. I would welcome MacT or Crawford over him.

He losses Daniel and his team completely falls apart, found a line that worked late in the season with Lappy, Burrows and Henrik then juggles the lines again come playoff time.

This. This right here! You said it better then I could have ever done.I just don't understand why AV would mess with lines that are winning what the point of splitting them up? Also why were they not put together right away in game one, why did Lu start game two after losing in game one? And also WHAT happened to the AMEX line??? I do not like it when he would put Higgy on the third line and put Raymond on the 2nd it made NO SENSE.. Then again putting Raymond with Henrik made even less sense. I really liked what he has done for our team but his time is done!
  • 0

Posted Image
Do Not Trade TanevPosted Image

Thanks TS <3

formely known as Gillyfluffball


#90 Ginu

Ginu

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 530 posts
  • Joined: 30-January 09

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:13 PM

AV has huge issues getting the team to adapt and I think this is because AV as a coach has a tough time adapting. In all respect AV is a fine coach but he doesn't have what it takes to get a team to win the holy grail. Sure we went to game 7 in the stf last year but somehow we came up short again due to the teams inability to score.
This scoring issue goes back to last season and especially the Boston series.

In all, I am tired of hearing oh we ran into a hot goalie and oh the team can get it done next time... AV needs to go and in all honesty he needs to take Raymond and Alberts when he leaves...
I know av doesn't do the trades but he has a big influence on gillis... Hevalwayscdreamed of a third line shutdown which he finally got and what happens??? Our offense goes down the crapper repeating last years Boston series... Can't score and can't solve the goalie and surprise surprise this cought up again and even worse since our pp went down the drainer.... And of course we knew of this since mid December.

I like kassian but the trade was bad... Buffalo won this trade without a doubt for this year and honestly I will be surprised if kassian ever becomes that "power forward" in the future... Sure he has potential but trade a player like Coho for a prospect future prospect.... Coho will be missed for years to come.

The team needs a coaching change. Av is not cutting it. He got what he wanted yet he still failed.
  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.