Tanev's Smirk Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Why does everyone we trade for (not including Sopel) end up crying. . . Can MG start trading for men? Please. (this post is in jest) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoasting Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 What I still fail to comprehend is that if last year's loss was so devastating, why didn't he leave then? After just one year of his contract. But he will leave now? Who signs a 12 year deal and then asks to opt out TWO years later? 5 years, maybe.... 7 years... but after 2 years? When he got signed, no one knew how old he was? Or that he would be getting older? Or that he could have shaky seasons? Or that he wouldn't be the best of the best anymore? Come on, people. Get real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmylu1 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 if lu goes to tampa so do i Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiredatwork Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 What I still fail to comprehend is that if last year's loss was so devastating, why didn't he leave then? After just one year of his contract. But he will leave now? Who signs a 12 year deal and then asks to opt out TWO years later? 5 years, maybe.... 7 years... but after 2 years? When he got signed, no one knew how old he was? Or that he would be getting older? Or that he could have shaky seasons? Or that he wouldn't be the best of the best anymore? Come on, people. Get real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BuckFoston Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I think it's you who should get real. After last season he still had his starting goaltending job... not looking like that is going to happen for next year is it? So do you think he is going to want to sit on the bench for games at a stretch waiting to get a game to play or waive his ntc and go play somewhere as a starter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BuckFoston Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 It's not the amount of years into the contract. Management has given him the message that he is no longer the #1 guy. The thought of being a backup or even the guy we are "stuck" with might not appeal to him. To be the number one guy someplace else is probably something he would want. Nobody knows for sure at this poitn though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanev's Smirk Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Fact: There will be lots of speculation from everyone until something happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jono2009 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 there is guarantee he is going anywhere, we dont know whats going to happen so why speculate? he could stay he could go, schneider could stay or go, both could go? we just dont know, time will tell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Ummm...So what if his wife is closer to home?? His wife is HERE. And they go back to Florida EVERY SUMMER anyways, so whats your point? Ya, I know they have family there...but LU has FAMILY in Montreal...so ya... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edler's Broken Stickz Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 It would be awesome if Luo went to tampa and pulled off a vezina year. Imagine Luo won the cup there with stammer oh the irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Sorry to burst your bubble, but Luongo isn't going anywhere. Gillis is not the type of GM that signs a player to a 12 year contract only to trade him two years into it. That would ruin his chances of signing any players long term again. Him acting like he's uncertain which goalie he's going to keep is just him playing the game of further increasing Schneider's value. Schneider can bring us a huge return this summer as in a top 5 pick. This could very well be an impact player that can step right into our lineup. Luongo has proven that he can carry this team all the way. He just needs a backup that can carry some of the load during the regualr season, and a D core that doesn't meltdown consistently in the playoffs. I still believe Luongo can bring us a cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Sorry to burst your bubble, but Luongo isn't going anywhere. Gillis is not the type of GM that signs a player to a 12 year contract only to trade him two years into it. That would ruin his chances of signing any players long term again. Him acting like he's uncertain which goalie he's going to keep is just him playing the game of further increasing Schneider's value. Schneider can bring us a huge return this summer as in a top 5 pick. This could very well be an impact player that can step right into out lineup. Luongo has proven that he can carry this team all the way. He just needs a backup that can carry some of the load during the regualr season, and a D core that doesn't meltdown consistently in the playoffs. I still believe Luongo can bring us a cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks.brad Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 luongo to gillis: trade me to chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iknowitall Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 i see tampa but one of VERY few luongo would allow. one of the other few being the panthers. but obviously tampa is the most logical choice. i would be fine getting nothing in return, take his contract and see ya later. luongo is a regular season goalie. his stats during the season are average, and the playoffs they are brutal. 8 goals in 2 games vs an LA team that is one of the lowest scoring in the league. also don't forget those 8 goal and 7 goal playoff games... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-miss-Wis Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I just don't see how you guys can unload Luongo's contract with that many years and money left on it. I didn't think he was bad at all in games 1-3 with LA for you but for whatever reason he always seems to be the scapegoat when things don't go as planned. I don't see how he can be happy there getting pulled for game 4 especially when your coach admitted that tending wasn't the problem. I see Schneider being traded in the offseason and you guys getting some quality players or high draft picks in return. I don't see what other options are available as the Canucks are not going to waive Luongo and eat his contract. This is where those lifetime contracts can hurt teams. Every team seems to have a few of them and they become crippling in situations such as this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iknowitall Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I just don't see how you guys can unload Luongo's contract with that many years and money left on it. I didn't think he was bad at all in games 1-3 with LA for you but for whatever reason he always seems to be the scapegoat when things don't go as planned. I don't see how he can be happy there getting pulled for game 4 especially when your coach admitted that tending wasn't the problem. I see Schneider being traded in the offseason and you guys getting some quality players or high draft picks in return. I don't see what other options are available as the Canucks are not going to waive Luongo and eat his contract. This is where those lifetime contracts can hurt teams. Every team seems to have a few of them and they become crippling in situations such as this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckin_futz Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 luongo played only in game 1 and 2. allowing 8 goals to one of the lowest scoring teams in the league.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iknowitall Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 oh yah, gillis: you NEVER sign goalies long term. how many goalies in the last 10 years of the nhl have had sucessful careers? roy, brodeur and hasek. with 60+ goalies a season, over 10 nhl seasons, your probably looking at 300 or so goalies over that time but under 10 who stayed sucessful. goalies are streaky. cam ward, osgood, nabokov, cujo, etc... they have their flashes of brilliance then back to medicrocity. luongo is no different. schneider will be no different. sign him to a 5 year contract and hopefully we get 3 or 4 great seasons out him, then on to the next one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-miss-Wis Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 luongo played only in game 1 and 2. allowing 8 goals to one of the lowest scoring teams in the league.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lou#1 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Sorry to burst your bubble, but Luongo isn't going anywhere. Gillis is not the type of GM that signs a player to a 12 year contract only to trade him two years into it. That would ruin his chances of signing any players long term again. Him acting like he's uncertain which goalie he's going to keep is just him playing the game of further increasing Schneider's value. Schneider can bring us a huge return this summer as in a top 5 pick. This could very well be an impact player that can step right into our lineup. Luongo has proven that he can carry this team all the way. He just needs a backup that can carry some of the load during the regualr season, and a D core that doesn't meltdown consistently in the playoffs. I still believe Luongo can bring us a cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.