Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

luongo.is.god

Interesting Comments By David Booth On Twitter Today

199 posts in this topic

Posted · Hidden by Templeton Peck, April 24, 2012 - No reason given

trade the fans, starting with the under-performers like RunningWild

1

Share this post


Link to post

When expectations are unrealistically high, sometimes things falls flat on your face.

Same as that very smart kid that got constantly pushed to get 95%+ in school. He is very smart but even 93% is viewed as failure and the parents yell at him. Eventually he skip school, joined a gang, and start doing drugs.

To those that suddenly for no reason decided to bring religion into this, yes God does have a purpose: To weed out fans like you.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised he didn't say it was all part of God's plan or something..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's right. Personally I don't mind dissecting, analayzing, and even criticising players, because I like the strategy and technical part of the game. But I hate when a little criticism turns into full on bashing and hate. I think there's a difference there.

Some fans have the attitude that the team somehow owes them something personally. It's so pathetic when people who are sitting on their comfy couch in the living room, straight up insult professional athletes who are actually out there doing the hard work and dedicating their lives to the sport. Well ff the player you're insulting is a "bum" or a "loser", then what does that make you? A huge hypocrite.

I think of the time when Paul McCallum missed that kick in the Grey Cup, and "fans" dumped cow sh*t on his lawn. How can any logical person do that?

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

trade the fans, starting with the under-performers like RunningWild

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this speech is more applicable to professions in which you don't get paid millions to play a sport.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's people like you who have no place on this board. You have a constructive comment, cool, post it. It's these types of comments that give CDC a bad name.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I swear I saw a camera shot of him on the bench with Daniel during game 4 telling Daniel he prayed that he would be back and healthy, Daniel had the look like ya ummm...... thanks man?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one forced David Booth, or any other professional athlete to chose this profession as their job. It was a choice. And the reality in professional sports and fanbases are, you don't have one without the other. Their is no 'Vancouver Canucks' if they don't have a large fanbase who a) buys tickets to hockey games b ) purchases team merchandise c) watch the team in TV

You choose to play professional sports, then you choose you to be in the spotlight. That spotlight will always provide a combination of love and hate, it's how professional sports work. Habs are under just as much pressure as the Leafs, why have they made the playoffs? The Leafs are a bad hockey team, that's why they didn't make the playoffs - it has nothing to do with their fanbase.

I am under public scrutiny in my job, but I realized that when I accepted the challenge. I chose this career and it meant I chose what came with it. The sooner David Booth can accept that, the sooner he can take responsibility for his own actions.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

coming from the guy who's response to Booth's message was "screw you I pay your salary"? That's a constructive message is it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by hockeyville88, April 24, 2012 - No reason given

No one forced David Booth, or any other professional athlete to chose this profession as their job. It was a choice. And the reality in professional sports and fanbases are, you don't have one without the other. Their is no 'Vancouver Canucks' if they don't have a large fanbase who a) buys tickets to hockey games b ) purchases team merchandise c) watch the team in TV

You choose to play professional sports, then you choose you to be in the spotlight. That spotlight will always provide a combination of love and hate, it's how professional sports work. Habs are under just as much pressure as the Leafs, why have they made the playoffs? The Leafs are a bad hockey team, that's why they didn't make the playoffs - it has nothing to do with their fanbase.

I am under public scrutiny in my job, but I realized that when I accepted the challenge. I chose this career and it meant I chose what came with it. The sooner David Booth can accept that, the sooner he can take responsibility for his own actions.

0

Share this post


Link to post

I swear I saw a camera shot of him on the bench with Daniel during game 4 telling Daniel he prayed that he would be back and healthy, Daniel had the look like ya ummm...... thanks man?

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't even compare your job to them and this excuse that they choose is bull. They're doing something they love which outweighs the bad but that doesn't mean it doesn't sucks when random so called fans are ragging on you. If you don't like the team please vote for another and let a real fan take your spot...simple you don't have a reason to complain and we don't have a reason to read your crap

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what Booth said rubbed some people the wrong way.

The quote is what it is. What's up for interpretation is David Booth's projection of it.

At least to me, it does not seem like a collective "screw you" to the fans. I think all he's trying to say is don't be so quick to judge. Here we are on CDC pointing fingers and accusing players of failing to meet expectations. It's within our right to do so, everyone is allowed to have an opinion - but I think Booth is just asking us to look at the players who are "marred by dust and sweat and blood" and have some form of sympathy. Obviously the players are not ignorant, they know they did not meet Vancouver's expectations - but who are we to say that they did not give every ounce of effort they could muster up.

Hockey is a sport. Sports are really just a collection of athleticism, desire and luck. Sometimes you may work your butt off and things just never happen to go your way. Sometimes you can overcome the odds and prevail, but more often than not you are met with defeat.

Again, I think Booth's just saying - they tried the best they could and would like for the fans to realize this and in times of defeat, look to past achievements for some future hope.

Just my interpretation. But who knows - I've been studying calculus all day so for all I know, my brain's turned to mush. <_<

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's right. Personally I don't mind dissecting, analayzing, and even criticising players, because I like the strategy and technical part of the game. But I hate when a little criticism turns into full on bashing and hate. I think there's a difference there.

Some fans have the attitude that the team somehow owes them something personally. It's so pathetic when people who are sitting on their comfy couch in the living room, straight up insult professional athletes who are actually out there doing the hard work and dedicating their lives to the sport. Well ff the player you're insulting is a "bum" or a "loser", then what does that make you? A huge hypocrite.

I think of the time when Paul McCallum missed that kick in the Grey Cup, and "fans" dumped cow sh*t on his lawn. How can any logical person do that?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drama queen. Been on a line with Kesler too long

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're an amazing lip reader. I'm sorry, I don't mean to spark a debate but it just goes to show from the other posts how uptight the irreligious people on this board are. From David Booth's comments, none of which are religous -> religious debate.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.