If The Scf Was Boston Vs Chicago Who Would You Cheer For ?

[Tearloch7]

Some folks would cheer for serious, career ending injuries to every player on both teams .. not me .. I like Tyler Seguin ..

[Common sense]

No one

[magoomba]

Boston is by far a dirtier team. At least on the Hawks there is a handful of players I respect

[Crimson-JH]

I would not even bother watching the finals if that was the outcome... And I do have the right not to choose while paying zero attention to them..

[6string]

in this situation you always cheer for the visiting team to piss off the fans and home team, right into game seven!

[Thirteen]

Chicago but they would only win if on they trade Keith and Hossa for 2010 type depth and a goalie!

Boston would lose and I would enjoy watching Toews winning his 2nd over Chara.....

[Sandro17]

Boston.

Chicago didn't deserve to win the cup in 2010. IMO they were paper champions. They were a team just waiting to explode due to ending contracts and were only in the cup race due to circumstance. After 2010, the team exploded and could no longer sustain itself.

As for the SCF, I hate to say it but us losing was partially our fault (The most amazing PP in the NHL couldn't score wtf?). And while Boston was lucky because they had to face us while we were injured, I'd rather see a team win a cup because their opponents were injured as compared to winning a cup because the team's players had no say in how much they were going to make that year.

Chicago was exposed for what it truly was the next year :D

Which is a team that simply timed their contracts to win, none of their players had the heart to take hometown discounts or anything to help the team, the players really were just in the right place at the right time.

[NightHawkSniper]

I would cheer for the Chicago Wolves.

[Cause=Time]

Well the sad truth is somebody has to win, this isn't a world of warcraft where you can just turn it off and the game ends.

[DollarAndADream]

Chicago has more players that I like on the team.

Toews, Sharp, Seabrook, Keith( I guess not anymore ), Crawford, Emery, Oduya.

Boston I only like Seguin, Thomas, Krejci really.

[SOB for MVP]

Id prefer Chicago, but I defs wouldnt be cheering

[Van_City123]

Chicago

[Sergei Shirokov]

I dunno if Chicago really has that many players to hate on except david bolland. Toews and Sharp are pretty good guys. Don't really have anything against the rest. Keith made a mistake taking out daniel sedin, but then again, that was sort of a retailiation for an earlier hit.

When Byfuglien, Eager, Burrish, Bolland, and Ladd were on thje team, that was a different story.

[tricarboxylic]

Chicago, because Luongo might go to that team, and no kudos to Boston that has Marchand, Lucic, and Chara, who make cheap shots, and Tim Thomas, who thinks he's the President of the United States.

[Edler Is a Beast]

i'd cheer for a natural disaster.

[tricarboxylic]

Whichever team gives injuries to Brad Marchand, Tim Thomas, or Duncan Keith, Patrick Kane............ if no injuries, Chicago, as I have stated earlier.

[Pears]

Chicago. I have soft spots for Toews and Kane.

[Crimson-JH]

Chicago. I have soft spots for Toews and Kane.

[Serendipity]

How can you have a soft spot for that little prick...? Beating up a Cabby, big ego, and rude..

[SukhKular]

Chicago. At least they play hockey. Our rivalry with them was a hockey rivalry. Boston is surrounded unpunished dirty hits, dirty players, conspiracy theories and a smug redneck goalie who's overrated because his defence is allowed to clothesline anyone who gets too close to the slot.