Merci Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 All you Lu haters make me ???? sick. If you think Schneiders better can't you just say that instead of bashing Lu as well. Luongo is one the best goalies in the league....... I know the same people hating on Lu now will be the same people hating on Schneider as soon as he has a few bad games, everyone just STFU about our goalies, it isn't the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onions Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Great article! People in Vancouver don't know what they have until it's gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underachieving Hero of CDC Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 i already vomited like 100 times... literally..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tricarboxylic Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Yea but we say Schnieder should be our number 1, trade Luongo. And you all retort you're all ???? retarded why would we trade the guy that got us to game 7 of the SCF. And we say: because Luongo melts down; supporting evidence 1, supporting evidence 2, supporting evidence 3, supporting evidence 4 Schneider has played 5 playoff games you're a ???? moron if we trade Luu we wouldn't even make the playoffs next year He has Dominak Hasek like stats, and in literally 70 NHL games has had 1 bad game against Nashville this January. Shut up Luongo is the best!!!!11111!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tricarboxylic Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 That doesn't sound too good. Hold on, I'll give Dr. Recchi a call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vancanwincup Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Can not compare different eras, more goals were scored during the time Roy played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vancanwincup Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Other goalie's would choke? How do you know that. I just think a goalie is all about mental toughness not emotional competitiveness. Luongo beats himself up and it has shown his entire playoff career. I didn't even want to cheer for the Canucks after game 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underachieving Hero of CDC Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 If her profile is right you're arguing with a 12 year old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 It is speculated that Cory Schneider may not be as good as we think he is. The Hasek-like stats he has established as a backup? They were not consecutive games mostly. Luongo's Choking in Playoffs? Wait until he's traded, and he gets that team the Cup. Schneider would be our Number 1? Just put him on the spotlight, and see how he melts down. Waste of another young, budding goaltender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Schneider would be our Number 1? Just put him on the spotlight, and see how he melts down. Waste of another young, budding goaltender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shimy1 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 your a clown. seriously, ur taking 3 games and using that as ur sample size. I could do the same thing and look what happens. Loungo cant win in the stanley cup finals. YES HE CAN LOOK AT THIS 3 WINS... 2 shut outs, 0.66 GAA 0.979 Sv% AND THATS IN THE STANLEY CUP FINALS... who would u rather have, a guy that can get u 3 wins like that in the finals, or a guy that can put up worse stats in the 1st round and still lose??? See how stupid ur arguement looks when u use such a small sample size??? I feel like CDC should have a mandatory stats enrichment courses that comes with signing up on these boards so at least ppl can look and have an idea of what numbers mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 your a clown. seriously, ur taking 3 games and using that as ur sample size. I could do the same thing and look what happens. Loungo cant win in the stanley cup finals. YES HE CAN LOOK AT THIS 3 WINS... 2 shut outs, 0.66 GAA 0.979 Sv% AND THATS IN THE STANLEY CUP FINALS... who would u rather have, a guy that can get u 3 wins like that in the finals, or a guy that can put up worse stats in the 1st round and still lose??? See how stupid ur arguement looks when u use such a small sample size??? I feel like CDC should have a mandatory stats enrichment courses that comes with signing up on these boards so at least ppl can look and have an idea of what numbers mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanCityWings Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Sadly Bobby Luuu is going to get traded he asked for on. Gunna miss you #1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Luongo has played 50+ playoff games and has a total of 3 good games. Schneider has played 4 and had 4 good games. Check, mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puckluv Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Thanks for the post. Luuuu rules in my books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shimy1 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Luongo has played 50+ playoff games and has a total of 3 good games. Schneider has played 4 and had 4 good games. Check, mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I love how when presented with actual facts... people start going on about invisible and non-measurable things like being "clutch" and "intangibles". They start grasping at straws to try to validate their misconceived view of the universe by just making stuff up rather than facing the reality that they are demonstrably and empirically wrong. It is entirely bollocks, and just shows that these folks simply don't understand math enough to recognize what is real and not real. In the goaltending department more than any other position the statistics tell the whole story. Save percentage and GAA are the only indicators that matter. They aren't throwing hits, they are intimidating other players with their physical play... they are either stopping the puck or they aren't. As the article rightly points out, people have taken a couple of bad playoff games and using that to form their opinion. They then disregard all the other evidence (many more than 2 games) to the contrary because those facts do not agree with their opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Luongo has played 50+ playoff games and has a total of 3 good games. Schneider has played 4 and had 4 good games. Check, mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canada Hockey Place Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Luongo hasn't requested a trade. He simply stated that he won't fight the team if they see trading him as an option. It was a class act and haters are trying to throw him under the bus for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I love how when presented with actual facts... people start going on about invisible and non-measurable things like being "clutch" and "intangibles". They start grasping at straws to try to validate their misconceived view of the universe by just making stuff up rather than facing the reality that they are demonstrably and empirically wrong. It is entirely bollocks, and just shows that these folks simply don't understand math enough to recognize what is real and not real. In the goaltending department more than any other position the statistics tell the whole story. Save percentage and GAA are the only indicators that matter. They aren't throwing hits, they are intimidating other players with their physical play... they are either stopping the puck or they aren't. As the article rightly points out, people have taken a couple of bad playoff games and using that to form their opinion. They then disregard all the other evidence (many more than 2 games) to the contrary because those facts do not agree with their opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.