Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Is Jannik Hansen Ready For A Top-6 Role?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
74 replies to this topic

#61 Niloc009

Niloc009

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,736 posts
  • Joined: 12-October 09

Posted 12 May 2012 - 09:34 AM

Yes. On most teams in the league, he'd be a 2nd liner. However, if I see him in the top 6 this year, something has gone horribly wrong. We need a real second line RW on this team. Enough of the tweeners like Higgins, Raymond, and Hansen. They're all great players, but I would prefer to have a real offensive player.

Posted Image


STHS Hockey League - Brooklyn Beavers GM


#62 RyanKeslord17

RyanKeslord17

    Canucks First-Line

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,895 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 11

Posted 12 May 2012 - 10:50 AM

I was thinking of putting Hansen with the twins for all of next year. Remeber when Burr was hurt an he worked so well with them? I feel he has what it takes. He goes into corners, hits, and works real hard every shift. He's like a more gritty Burrows with more speed. If we get an awesome UFA or top 6 forward, our team is looking good up front.

Sedin-Sedin-Hansen
Parise-Kesler-Burrows
Higgins-Lapierre-Kassian
Bitz-Malhotra-Weise

Don't think Booth fits on this team IMO. He and Kes don't work and nor does he work with the twins.
Posted Image

#63 Chronic.Canucks.Fan

Chronic.Canucks.Fan

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 273 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 12

Posted 12 May 2012 - 12:23 PM

If he spent some time this offseason working on his shot and puck control.. I could see him surprising a lot of people come training camp challenging for a top 6 role. He's been consistently improving season after season and if anything he's just starting to hit his prime.

If not in the top-6 though, he can always go back to the 3rd line checking role he plays so well and maybe pot a few more goals this year?

20 goals for Hansen in 12-13!!

#64 Baggins

Baggins

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,956 posts
  • Joined: 30-July 03

Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:26 PM

That's true but he is especially hard on rookies. Guys Ritchie was terrible defesively with a team low in minus and Cowan just plain sucks. So its just a tighter leash plus his bias towards certain players.


Of course he is. They tend to need the lesson more often. Most of the veterans have already had the lesson. Kesler, Burrows, Raymond and Hansen have all gone through this with AV and are all very good at the defensive side as a result. Scotty Bowman was the same way as a coach and GM.

How long did Ritchie and Cowan last here? Plus you're going back to when the team had limited options. There's more competition for spots and ice time now.
Posted Image

#65 Jaku

Jaku

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,186 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 08

Posted 12 May 2012 - 02:28 PM

quick answer, no. He's a good 3rd line player, and should stay a 3rd liner IMO. If he ever makes his way up to a top six spot, he's going to have to work on his puck handling skills a little more.. He's quick, and isn't afraid to finish his checks, which i like, but he has hands of cement it seems. Good on him for having a career year, but his 3rd line role, is a good place for him to be.
R.I.P- #37 Rick Rypien, #28 Luc Bourdon, #38 Pavol Demitra Forever Canucks.
Posted Image
Credit to Khalifawiz501 for the Sig.
Posted ImageColorado Avalanche GM in CDC STHS Sim League

#66 Mike Vanderhoek

Mike Vanderhoek

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,023 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 09

Posted 12 May 2012 - 03:50 PM

Jannik is not a top 6 forward, its ok to be a fan and enjoy watching him play, but he is not a top 6 forward and thats ok. He is very solid in his role right now. You won't get a lot more out of him in terms of production unless he is playing the role of Anson Carter with Daniel and Henrik.
Posted Image

#67 tas

tas

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,610 posts
  • Joined: 16-July 06

Posted 12 May 2012 - 03:58 PM

if jannik hansen in a fixture in your top 6, your top 6 isn't good enough.

and he's one of my favorite players.

#68 Buttock

Buttock

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,559 posts
  • Joined: 18-March 08

Posted 12 May 2012 - 04:05 PM

Regardless of whether he should be a top six forward and regardless of how effective he is on the third line, it needs to be said that

1) Hansen is the RW best suited to play with Kesler, by far, and
2) Hansen can play on any line.

#69 Mike Vanderhoek

Mike Vanderhoek

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,023 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 09

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:29 PM

He sure can be used on any line throughout a game if needed, but he is not a player you place into a top 6 role on a regular basis.
Posted Image

#70 Buttock

Buttock

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,559 posts
  • Joined: 18-March 08

Posted 13 May 2012 - 07:20 AM

A few years ago, when Burrows' career high in goals was 12, most probably would have said the same about him. And Kesler, for that matter, who was still a third line player at the time. Jannik Hansen scored more goals in a third line role than Burrows ever did! And, if you watched the few games this year that Burrows played on Pahlsson's line you probably thought, as I did, "wow, that line is a lot better with Burrows on it." Maybe Hansen, like Burrows, is a prototypical third-line player, but that doesn't mean it's where he can best help the team. Hansen is simply the best winger for Kesler that we have on the roster (except maybe for Burrows) - he can keep up and he has the inclination and ability to get the puck to Kesler - and he deserves a long look there.

#71 CanuckFan1981

CanuckFan1981

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 677 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 06

Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:34 AM

Yes, and the fact Raymond gets to play on the 2nd and he doesn't is absurd cause Jannik is way more effective. But also, I think the 3rd line suits him better cause it's one line he makes better with his style of play.


The OP just said this was his career year with 16 goals and 23 assists. How can you say he should replace Raymond, who had 25 goals and 28 assists in his best year. Raymond is obviously a better fit for 2nd line. Yes, he had an off year and there are things about his game that aren't desirable, namely his size. But just because you are mad at Raymond for having a bad year doesn't mean a 3rd liner is going to be better than him. Hansen had some stints up with the second line this year. When it went cold he went back to the third and the 3rd line became more effective while the 2nd stayedd about the same. I like Hansen, but if he is on the 2nd line we are looking for top 6 forwards.. again.

#72 nzan

nzan

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 238 posts
  • Joined: 19-August 05

Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:55 PM

The OP just said this was his career year with 16 goals and 23 assists. How can you say he should replace Raymond, who had 25 goals and 28 assists in his best year. Raymond is obviously a better fit for 2nd line. Yes, he had an off year and there are things about his game that aren't desirable, namely his size. But just because you are mad at Raymond for having a bad year doesn't mean a 3rd liner is going to be better than him. Hansen had some stints up with the second line this year. When it went cold he went back to the third and the 3rd line became more effective while the 2nd stayedd about the same. I like Hansen, but if he is on the 2nd line we are looking for top 6 forwards.. again.

If Raymond would play like he did in his best year no one would be mad at him, but he won't. He has had TWO off years because he hasn't been playing an effective game. His production has tailed off because his play has been so bad. He takes weak shots from the perimeter that no beer league goalie would let in and has only played effectively in two very short spurts over the last season; first, directly when he came back from injury (thus nullifying the argument that his back is the problem) and second, after he got benched. Maybe he should get benched every second or third game, maybe then we'd have a player that would drive the net.
Over the past two years Hansen has been a considerably more valuable player.

#73 Raph

Raph

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,577 posts
  • Joined: 23-January 09

Posted 13 May 2012 - 02:36 PM

Raymond's production tailed off because the team's production (absence Ehrhoff) and his linemate's (Kesler off year, Booth sucks) production have also tailed off. What does this tell you? Raymond is just riding the coat tails of his teammates. He is a point leech, he does not make the players around him better, nor can he do it himself.
Untouchables: Tanev, Jensen, Kassian
Mostly untouchable: Sedins (need someone to man the fort and no trade value)
Open to trade: Everyone else
Drive to airport: Bieksa, Edler

Bring back: Ehrhoff

#74 RyanKeslord17

RyanKeslord17

    Canucks First-Line

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,895 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 11

Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:03 PM

Raymond's production tailed off because the team's production (absence Ehrhoff) and his linemate's (Kesler off year, Booth sucks) production have also tailed off. What does this tell you? Raymond is just riding the coat tails of his teammates. He is a point leech, he does not make the players around him better, nor can he do it himself.


He couldn't even manage a single point when AV tried the Sedin-Sedin-Raymond experiment. This tells me that he is completely useless, not even a point leech.
Posted Image

#75 Hyzer

Hyzer

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,919 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 12

Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:20 PM

I think he could be, but he is so damn good at being a third liner. He had 40 points this season on the third line... legit. He fights for the puck well and is defensively sound, but his ability to finish goals and stickhandling makes me sort of sad on the inside.




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.