Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Hawks - Canucks


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 GuzzIer

GuzzIer

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 145 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 08

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:16 PM

To Hawks
Edler
Luongo
Raymonds rights

To Canucks
Patrick Sharp


Sign Suter 7mill/6years

Sedin sedin burrows
Sharp kesler booth
Hansen pahlsson higgins
Manny lappy kassian

Suter bieksa
Hamhuis Salo
Tanev Ballard

Schneider
Lack
  • 0

#2 marleau_12

marleau_12

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,286 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 04

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:21 PM

Edler AND Luongo for Sharp? Damnnnn.
  • 0
Posted Image

#3 Rhinogator

Rhinogator

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,732 posts
  • Joined: 14-May 10

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:25 PM

i wouldn't even do luongo straight up for sharp.
  • 3
Posted ImagePosted Image

#4 ButterBean

ButterBean

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,228 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 09

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:27 PM

And if Suter doesn't sign with us, our defense is a steaming pile of crap. Not to mention we give Chicago one of the best defense cores in the league with

Keith - Seabrook
Edler - Hjalmarsson
Montador/Oduya - Leddy
  • 0

#5 Kack Zassian

Kack Zassian

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,240 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 12

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:27 PM

i wouldn't even do luongo straight up for sharp.


You crazy
  • 2

#6 GuzzIer

GuzzIer

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 145 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 08

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:27 PM

Th

i wouldn't even do luongo straight up for sharp.

Explain . . .
  • 0

#7 ButterBean

ButterBean

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,228 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 09

Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:28 PM

i wouldn't even do luongo straight up for sharp.

I'd do that in a heartbeat.
  • 4

#8 palindrom

palindrom

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,072 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:50 AM

If Chicago planned to acquire a #01, why did they extend Emery instead of letting him go as UFA ?
  • 0
Posted Image Was too much for me!

Instead im reading English grammar for advanced dummies





#9 Pears

Pears

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,827 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:50 AM

i wouldn't even do luongo straight up for sharp.

I'd do that and never look back. We are talking about the same Patrick Sharp right?
  • 2
Posted Image

Credit to (>'-')> for the amazing sig!!

#10 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,204 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:27 AM

Oh God no! I wouldn't trade any core player to Chicago, especially not 2 players, and especially not players that would fix the major problems they had this year.
  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image
---------------------------------------------------

#11 da.moose

da.moose

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 960 posts
  • Joined: 14-May 09

Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:37 AM

No way chicago even wants Luongo.
  • 0

#12 The Sedin's 6th Sense

The Sedin's 6th Sense

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,431 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:42 AM

i wouldn't even do luongo straight up for sharp.


  • 0

Posted Image




"You know what my favourite Super Bowl is? The next one."

- Tom Brady


#13 RyanKeslord17

RyanKeslord17

    Canucks First-Line

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,895 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:43 AM

Throw in Booth instead of Raymond's rights and get Bickell coming the other way :)
  • 0
Posted Image

#14 Toews

Toews

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 637 posts
  • Joined: 24-June 09

Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:04 AM


Thats fine, because we wont do that either. We will keep one of the best wingers in the league and you can keep the goalie that underachieves in the playoffs.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.