Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Which Teams Will Be The Big Players This Offseason?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
19 replies to this topic

#1 naslund.is.king

naslund.is.king

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,142 posts
  • Joined: 21-August 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:10 PM

My big 5 teams this off season (NO ORDER)
DETROIT. Loads of cap space and the team seems finally 2 be a risk of missing the playoffs.
CALGARY. Large number Ufa's Combined with the obvious departure of iginla happening sooner then later.
SAN JOSE. One would think management in SJ is very close to a major shakeup.
TORONTO. Burkes time is running out. Will he over pay this offseason in one last effort to finally reach the promise land?
CANUCKS <3 The loss of the SCF combined with a first round exit has many people and fans questioning the core of our entire roster:( on D, offense and in net.
My dark horse the OILERS. Three years of playing like crap has won the oilers a third first overall pick in the draft .
Would love to hear some opinions, I know I follow some teams closer then others.

Edited by naslund.is.king, 14 May 2012 - 10:12 PM.


#2 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,165 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:25 PM

My top 5 would be Toronto, Detroit, Edmonton, Columbus, Calgary.

I think EDM and CBJ will be active because of their high draft picks and poor seasons. Anaheim and Nashville might be in the mix too if their star players, such as Ryan and Weber, are not part of their teams long term plan.

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#3 naslund.is.king

naslund.is.king

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,142 posts
  • Joined: 21-August 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:33 PM

[quote name='BUREV' timestamp='1337059522' post='10650791']
My top 5 would be Toronto, Detroit, Edmonton, Columbus, Calgary.

I think EDM and CBJ will be active because of their high draft picks and poor seasons. Anaheim and Nashville might be in the mix too if their star players, such as Ryan and Weber, are not part of their teams long term plan.
[/quote]yea Anaheim will be very interesting !We will see if they believe in their core group of guys who previously got er done.
Ottawa as well will be interesting especially if Daniel leaves do they stay on track with the rebuild or not?

#4 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,165 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:43 PM

yea Anaheim will be very interesting !We will see if they believe in their core group of guys who previously got er done.
Ottawa as well will be interesting especially if Daniel leaves do they stay on track with the rebuild or not?


Yea, both Anaheim and Ottawa will have to base their decisions on whether Selanne and Alfie retire or not. Should be interesting to see. I'd like to see them each play another year.

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#5 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,479 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:09 PM

I would say Detroit, Vancouver, Anaheim, Calgary and Edmonton will be high rollers. And to some extent I think Columbus might re-tool a bit this summer too.

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#6 DownUndaCanuck

DownUndaCanuck

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,291 posts
  • Joined: 28-July 07

Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:22 PM

We need to make a lot of changes on our defence. We have to make one in net. The Canucks will be very active, especially after winning 1 playoff game this season.

Ideally I would like to see one of our goalies gone and in return we find a top-3 defenceman to play 20-25 minutes with Edler, then retool our bottom defensive pairing to get bigger and more physical.

At forward I want to see more depth at center, perhaps a skilled top-6 forward (we have enough/too many big powerforwards now) to replace Kesler when he's injured and a backup goalie capable of 20-25 games.
Posted Image

#7 naslund.is.king

naslund.is.king

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,142 posts
  • Joined: 21-August 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:29 PM

I would say Detroit, Vancouver, Anaheim, Calgary and Edmonton will be high rollers. And to some extent I think Columbus might re-tool a bit this summer too.

what does Columbus have for good players other then jack j and Nash?? Thank god jack j went there. He was actually happy to be going to a team where he could show his stuff and hope 2 step up to a franchise player. I gained tons of respect for him that day true class act

#8 naslund.is.king

naslund.is.king

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,142 posts
  • Joined: 21-August 11

Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:34 PM

We need to make a lot of changes on our defence. We have to make one in net. The Canucks will be very active, especially after winning 1 playoff game this season.

Ideally I would like to see one of our goalies gone and in return we find a top-3 defenceman to play 20-25 minutes with Edler, then retool our bottom defensive pairing to get bigger and more physical.

At forward I want to see more depth at center, perhaps a skilled top-6 forward (we have enough/too many big powerforwards now) to replace Kesler when he's injured and a backup goalie capable of 20-25 games.

I totally agree depth never hurts..my hope is gillis can somehow size on d and wishful thinking a top 2 defenseman, even if he overpays a bit I'm ok with it

#9 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,482 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 15 May 2012 - 12:04 AM

OP, you have this in the wrong forum (should be in the proposals forum with a discussion tag), but I'll play along.

Detroit is famous for not making big moves, but I could see a signing a la the Hossa deal they did recently.

Toronto could make a move, but aren't likely to make more after the moves they made at the deadline this season.

Vancouver obviously will have one significant deal for a goalie, but I'm not sure how much else.

Calgary is possible, but I'm tempted to put them in the same group as Edmonton, Columbus, San Jose, etc. None of those teams had anything significant happen to the management side of things and will likely stick with the majority of their core. They may be in the market for supporting cast however.

Anaheim is on the bubble, they could make a number of deals to shore up their forwards beyond the first line. Nashville may be forced into it if they do lose significant pieces, but if only Suter goes, they'll likely fill from within.

Someone will go after the big UFA names, but I don't see too many major trades happening that would be all that exciting. I expect a number of teams to make minimal moves and try and adjust closer to the trade deadline.

Edited by elvis15, 15 May 2012 - 12:06 AM.

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#10 Boudrias

Boudrias

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,232 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:10 AM

Calgary: don't have much to move
Edmonton: whatever deals they make will be for youth as their timeline is still 2 - 3 years out
Detroit: simply because of the CAP space they have

Vancouver: moving a Louongo is a big deal, probably the biggest
Nashville: Suter moving is another big deal if it happens
SJ: whether the coach goes as a scape goat or someone from their top line, Marleau/Thorton. I wouldn't want either but many teams would.

TO: well we all know the world centers there so any off-season talk has to have the TO BS associated with it. The only significant assets Burkie has are his youth and that is self-defeating. Maybe Lupul but his health history is not solid.

#11 komodo1970

komodo1970

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 705 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 11

Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:21 AM

Vancouver, Tampa Bay, Toronto, Anaheim, Nashville

Vancouver has a goalie to deal with as well as support cast issues.
Tampa Bay needs a #1 goalie as well as secondary scoring.
Toronto has too many problems to list.
Anaheim needs support for its stars.
Nashville may be in need of defense as their two big stars don't seem much interested in returning.

#12 billabong

billabong

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,966 posts
  • Joined: 20-June 09

Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:49 AM

vancouver - im not just saying that, this needs more pieces and WE WANT IT NOW!!!

toronto - enough is enough, its beyond pathetic....stop hoping and praying you get good goaltending and pay the price and get some!!!!

detroit - they need to revamp and they have no choice

sj - they haft to make some core changing moves

tb - they are stripped down to the bone and haft to beef up so a busy summer is inevitable
Posted Image

#13 Canucks_fo_life

Canucks_fo_life

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,591 posts
  • Joined: 07-September 06

Posted 15 May 2012 - 01:04 PM

Detroit, Vancouver, Calgary
I rather lose with the Canucks, than win with any other team

This is OUR year

GO CANUCKS GOOOOOO!!!!!!!

#14 Dion Phaneuf

Dion Phaneuf

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,700 posts
  • Joined: 05-May 12

Posted 15 May 2012 - 03:46 PM

Anaheim
Edmonton
Detriot
Nashville
Tampa Bay

I don't see Gillis anything big other than the goalie deal. He usually stays pretty quiet during the off-season making low-key signings...

gallery_47851_23_84084.png

medium.png - CDCGML 483288048.png - EHL medium.png - STHS medium.png - CDCFL


#15 Canucksbiggestfan

Canucksbiggestfan

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,027 posts
  • Joined: 16-September 07

Posted 15 May 2012 - 04:10 PM

Vancouver, San Jose, Columbus, Calgary, Toronto.
Posted Image

Posted Image

#16 MoneypuckOverlord

MoneypuckOverlord

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,470 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 09

Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:22 PM

Everybody but L.A kings.

Players Nikolaj Ehlers have been compared too by the fan base of the Vancouver Canucks.

 

1 Pavel Bure

2 Markus Naslund

3 Nathan Mackkinon

4 Jonathan Drouin.

5 Jonathan Tavares

 

http://bleacherrepor...d-top-prospects

combine results.  Ehlers 5'11 162 lbs of solid rock.  


#17 Greene02

Greene02

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,781 posts
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:15 PM

I'm actually not expecting a big summer from the Oilers.

Hall - RNH - Eberle
Hemsky - Gagner - Yakupov
______- Horcoff - Jones
______ - Belanger - ______

Petry - Smid
Whitney - Schultz
_____ - Sutton
Potter

Top 6 is pretty much set. There is room on the left wing of the bottom 6 but I expect Paajarvi and Hartikainen to win jobs next season. Both play the left side. RW on the 4th line most likely goes to Hordichuk or someone similar. I could see Belanger losing his job to Anton Lander if he doesn't bounce back after an awful season.

As for the defense. The bottom pairing could use a complete make over. Sutton is better suited as a 7th Dman. In an ideal world they sign a #1 Dman and bump everyone down the depth chart but that's not realistic. Suter isn't signing in Edmonton and it wouldn't be smart to massively overpay him since Hall and Eberle's contracts are up next season.

Unless someone like Gagner gets traded for a Dman, I don't expect the Oilers to make a lot of noise. Maybe some depth signings and minor upgrades but that's it. Obviously a lot of Oilers fans are hoping Justin Schultz signs in Edmonton.

#18 cIutch

cIutch

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,285 posts
  • Joined: 13-April 12

Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:35 PM

hopefully us
Posted Image

#19 Zamboni_14

Zamboni_14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,550 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 03

Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:37 PM

San Jose might be a big player... simply because the moves they did this past off-season, really messed them up. Their "window" is almost closed and they need to make a run NOW, or blow it all up and start over.

Detroit.. because (as stated before) they have the space and they need a boost (but I think they'll only grab 1 or 2 "names"... could that be the trade Vancouver is looking for?)

Minnesota.. ok... I'll call myself biased on that. They will go after the same 2 big names as everyone else, but you never know... they might land 'em both (and along with the prospects that are expected to make the team... could push them to a solid playoff birth.) Yeah... I know.. a lot of big "IF's" in that.

#20 iinatcc

iinatcc

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Joined: 11-May 11

Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:35 AM

Nashville ... making it the 2nd round two years in and having a better record than Central Division Powerhouses like Detroit and Chicago, the Preds are sure to continue their heavy trade deadline activity this offseason.

They have a ton of players in Free Agency next season so they have a ton of Flexibility in how they are going to move forward.




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.