Canucks_fo_life Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 At 28 years old, I'd only offer a 2 or 3 year deal, nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Sign everyone to whatever it takes, then waive/demote all those who don't contribute enough. It works for NYR. Cheers. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robongo Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Coming off a career season I'd definitely not be willing to offer more than 3.5 /2 years. Also contingent on getting rid of ballard and not being able to Suter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diesel_3 Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Hm, I wonder if he is actually from White Rock or somebody from Surrey who just says they are from White Rock because they don't want to say they are from Surrey. Hm, Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownSuperman Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Bieksa-Hammer Edler-Garrison Tanev-Schultz not bad if that's how it ends up.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jijitsu Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Some statistics on Garrison: 77 GP - 16 G - 33 PTS - (+6) - 32 PIM 9 PPG - 168 shots 127 Hits, 124 Blocked Shots Averaged 23:41 per game, 2:31 on the PP, and 2:34 on PK. 6'2", 218 lbs, shoots Left, and He'll be 28 in November. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 "And as always when Garrison scores, the assist goes to Mr. Hat" I can hear DT making that call already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 If we sign him to 3m+ we would have the most expensive defence in the leauge lol. Hopefully MG doesnt go crazy and offer him money he wont live up to (ehem Bieksa,Malhotra) because he had a breakout year last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Get rid of Ballard and his cap hit first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucksbiggestfan Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 If Garrison signs for around 2.75-3 million then that would be a good deal, if it is any higher then I would rather not sign him. Garrison 3 years @ 9 million/ limited NTC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 At 28 years old, I'd only offer a 2 or 3 year deal, nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BZRK Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 3 years at 3.25? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 3 years at 3.25? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DollarAndADream Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Canucks can really use his giant bomb of a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 He would be a great fit. GET ER DONE MG!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southpop45 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 this could work out nice but only if: 1) Salo retires 2) Ballard is traded strong guy with huge shot would take Salo's spot on powerplay and he is capable of playing top 4 minutes. Not to mention that he really wants to play here, i dont think you can say no to a guy like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owen Nolan Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 He had 1 yes ONE good year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 He had 1 yes ONE good year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 This guy would be awesome to have. Edler-Garrison 1st PP unit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Good article: http://canucksarmy.com/2012/5/16/jason-garrison-tells-vancouver-radio-station-that-joining-the-canucks-would-be-a-thrill Anyone have the audio? His comments are interesting, he must be throwing out feelers to Van? I didn't realize he played on the right side this whole season - not many guys can play on their offside and put up the kind of underlying numbers he did. He's highly versatile: can play on his offside, can play a shut down role, can play an offensive role, drives play, physical, shot blocker, can play on PP and PK. Basically he'd be, by far, the Canucks most versatile d-man - somewhere AV is drooling. Bob McKenzie created a list of the most sought after UFA d-men this summer according to NHL GM's, Garrison was near the top. Therefore, he could get lots of $$ in FA - but he'd have to take a pay cut to play in Van ($3M - $3.5M). They'd have to get rid of Ballards/Alberts contracts (clearing up $5.425M of cap space) - basically, he'd make both of them redundant. 2012-13 roster ($21M) would be cheaper than 2011-12 roster ($22M) - thus leaving room to re-up Edler next yr: Hamhuis- Bieksa Edler- Garrison ($3.5M) Grags ($1.1M)- Tanev Rome ($1.225M) - Salo ($1.75M) That's a dangerous d-men roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.