Patrick Jane Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I'm not a homophobe, but it is clear what you are trying to do. This is a hockey forum, please take it else where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I'm not a homophobe, but it is clear what you are trying to do. This is a hockey forum, please take it else where. Trying to discuss hockey, and you randomly talk about some gay bullcrap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Don't be surprised if we don't see this guy around in a few hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Bissonnette Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I called him a mommies boy and he thinks im calling him gay which im not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulKariyaALH Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I called him a mommies boy and he thinks im calling him gay which im not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV. Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 You guys are all clowns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronning4center Posted May 22, 2012 Author Share Posted May 22, 2012 your a dumb person. luo was a vezina finalist last year. jennings winner and a gold medalist. the worst contract no by a long shot. vinny's contract is 7.8mill for 10more years. thats the worst buddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronning4center Posted May 22, 2012 Author Share Posted May 22, 2012 Yeah, he WAS a vezina finalist, just face it, he just sucks now, and will never return to the form he was years ago. Vinny's Contract is actually better, as he's averaged 80 points per season since the lockout, and will still be useful in the last years of his contract. Luongo will be a 5.33 mill backup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I haven't seen this much dysfunction since users Doughty & kanuck25 were here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Any goalie in the NHL could have put up similar numbers to Luongo because of the team that was playing infront of him. Elliot plays for Ottawa last year and almost ruined his NHL career. Elliot plays for Hitchcock this year and has a Vezina worthy season. What NHL execs see in Luongo is a goalie who has a huge contract and a player who couldn't close under pressure. That's it. GMs will take a shot at him because he is a proven regular season goalie who could be had for dirt cheap because Luongo has negative value. Vancouver takes a bad contract and off loads a player who has a longer bad contract. /user/91799-paulkariyaalh/">PaulKariyaALH knows what he's talking about and you don't have to insult him just because you don't agree nor want to hear what he has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Any goalie in the NHL could have put up similar numbers to Luongo because of the team that was playing infront of him. Elliot plays for Ottawa last year and almost ruined his NHL career. Elliot plays for Hitchcock this year and has a Vezina worthy season. What NHL execs see in Luongo is a goalie who has a huge contract and a player who couldn't close under pressure. That's it. GMs will take a shot at him because he is a proven regular season goalie who could be had for dirt cheap because Luongo has negative value. Vancouver takes a bad contract and off loads a player who has a longer bad contract. /user/91799-paulkariyaalh/">PaulKariyaALH knows what he's talking about and you don't have to insult him just because you don't agree nor want to hear what he has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 ConnorFutureGM and PaulKariyaALH have absolutley no idea what they're talking about. Luongo has negative value??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Any goalie in the NHL could have put up similar numbers to Luongo because of the team that was playing infront of him. Elliot plays for Ottawa last year and almost ruined his NHL career. Elliot plays for Hitchcock this year and has a Vezina worthy season. What NHL execs see in Luongo is a goalie who has a huge contract and a player who couldn't close under pressure. That's it. GMs will take a shot at him because he is a proven regular season goalie who could be had for dirt cheap because Luongo has negative value. Vancouver takes a bad contract and off loads a player who has a longer bad contract. /user/91799-paulkariyaalh/">PaulKariyaALH knows what he's talking about and you don't have to insult him just because you don't agree nor want to hear what he has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Haha, Tampa laughs at you. Luongo is declining, and probably has the worst contract in the nhl. St. Louis is worth more to the Lightning then the Sedins are to Vancouver. Try Schneider + Burrows, and maybe they won't laugh as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 regards, G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulKariyaALH Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 regards, G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Teams aren't eager to get Luongo, especially if they have to pay a price. Whatever team trades for Luongo gets married to him and the only thing he has actually proven is he's not a winner. If Luongo was as good as some of you make him out to be, you wouldn't be trading him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I'm tired of you, and your meaningless posts. It pisses me off every times I see that regards, G. Along with that other dbag TOML who keeps on saying Cheers. You aren't writing a ******* letter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Teams aren't eager to get Luongo, especially if they have to pay a price. Whatever team trades for Luongo gets married to him and the only thing he has actually proven is he's not a winner. If Luongo was as good as some of you make him out to be, you wouldn't be trading him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.