• Announcements

    • Templeton Peck

      BOARD SPECIFIC RULES   02/05/2016

      These are board specific rules, meant to try to make the Trades and Free Agent Signings forum better for everyone. YOU MUST READ AND ABIDE BY THESE FORUM RULES.

      1. If an event happens, wait a few minutes before posting, in all likelihood, someone has already posted it. We don't want numerous threads on the same event, so please search before posting.

      2. Please provide a clearly identifiable topic title for your thread so that user's can search for and find the appropriate thread easily. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate. This is to help avoid duplicate threads and to make searching easier. For any and all comments, please use the Topic Description box instead of the title.

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriately label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].

      3. All trades, signings, rumours and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread.

      The following are NOT considered valid sources: Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Hockeybuzz, Spector's Hockey and The Fourth Period are currently acceptable sources.

      The NHL Line, Brochu is Hockey and NHL Hockey News by saint Pako are currently invalid sources.

      4. Clearly misrepresenting the contents of your thread or posting false Trades/Signings/Acquisitions to send the forum into a frenzy will be taken very seriously and will result in an automatic suspension.

      5. Please put all proposals into the proposals forum and NOT this forum. Proposals found in this forum will be moved or deleted without warning.

      6. Please report any threads or messages that violate these or other board rules to the administrators or moderators() Do not respond by posting spammy messages such as 'IBTL', and 'LOCK AND BAN', or by attacking other users. The report button is located to the bottom left of every post.

      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM one of the Moderators or Administrators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

D-Money

[Speculation] Hawks May Consider Trading Bolland

6 posts in this topic

Now, this article is mere speculation...but I smirked at the idea that the guy who said the twins wouldn't be wanted on their team is being labelled as the most expendable part of their core:

Hawks could improve by dealing Bolland

May, 24, 2012

May 24, 1:28PM, By Jesse Rogers | ESPNChicago.com

It’s been a question that started being asked the moment the Chicago Blackhawks were knocked out of the playoffs last month in the first round for the second consecutive season. Should they trade from their core group that helped them win a Stanley Cup in 2010?

Dave Bolland never managed to grab hold of the second-line center spot.Before addressing that question a definition of the core group is needed. It consists of Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane, Marian Hossa, Patrick Sharp and Dave Bolland on offense. Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook are part of the core on defense while Niklas Hjalmarsson is on the edges as well.

These are mostly popular players who helped end a 49-year championship drought in Chicago. But when Wayne Gretzky can be traded it means no one in sports is untouchable, especially from a team that underachieved.

General manager Stan Bowman said after the season he wasn’t “fixated” on trading from that core group, but that doesn’t mean he won’t or shouldn’t. He would be foolish not to consider any avenue which might improve his team.

So to be clear, you don’t trade from the core group just to make a trade. You do it to get better, knowing that as magical as they were two years ago, they haven’t been able to repeat that magic.

So who goes?

Bowman was mostly right about at least one thing in shooting down the idea of trading from the core.

“It’s really difficult to remove one of those pieces, unless you have somebody that can fill that person’s spot,” he said days after the end of the season.

And it would be difficult to replace the skill of Kane or the two-way prowess of Hossa or the sharp-shooting of Sharp. But there is one player who could be considered redundant on the Hawks roster.

Dave Bolland.

This isn’t a criticism of Bolland. This is about trying to get better as a team, and Bolland might be expendable in that regard.

A case can be made that Bolland, who turns 26 on June 5, has shown the type of player he will be: a great defensive guru come playoff time who never realizes his offensive potential. His high point total of 47 was achieved four seasons ago. And he doesn’t seem like the player dying to move up in the pecking order of centers. He had 130 points (for the London Knights) the year before turning pro.

There is little doubt he would be missed, especially after considering his incredible defensive performance that Stanley Cup postseason, but it also means he has value outside the market.

The reason Bolland might be expendable comes down to one person -- Marcus Kruger, who could fill that third-line role though he was asked to play above his head on the second line most of last season.

To be clear, Kruger is not close to the player that Bolland is, but he is smart and can play defense and is getting better. If Kruger can be 70 percent of what Bolland is and Bolland can help you fetch a player who is 100 percent better than what they had, say at second-line center, then that’s where the math of the deal favors the Hawks.

Speaking of that second line, Joel Quenneville has had every opportunity to make Bolland a fixture as the center there. Yet it hasn’t happened. Kruger played there as did a myriad of other forwards including, of course, Kane. Bolland has actually had a few turns as the second-line center, but he never grabbed hold of the job. In fact, if Kruger can do a decent job on the third line, why didn’t Quenneville just make that move within his team?

Play Bolland on the second line and Kruger on the third. The reason is it would have hurt both lines instead of helping them. Bolland is not a second-line center and may never be, and he doesn’t seem to be a player who cares if he is. He’s content where he is.

Trade partner

So what could the Hawks get back for Bolland? There are rumors which seem to have some basis coming out of Pittsburgh that 6-foot-4, 220-pound center Jordan Staal will be available via the trade market. He has one year left on a deal with a salary cap hit of $4 million. He’ll be an unrestricted free-agent after next season as will teammate Sidney Crosby. Staal, 23, had 25 goals and 25 assists in 62 games last season and would be a perfect fit for the Hawks.

Jordan Staal would be a great fit with the Blackhawks.He can be a net presence on the power play, something the Hawks sorely lacked, and he’s one of the premier penalty killers in the NHL as well. He was a Selke finalist for best defensive forward in 2010, and of course he’s a Stanley Cup winner with Pittsburgh in 2009. So he fills 3-4 needs for the Hawks starting with a role as that elusive second-line center.

Bolland alone won’t get Staal. Not even close. But Bolland and hot prospect Brandon Saad might get the Penguins to the table. Saad is a Pittsburgh native and very popular in that area. A package of Bolland, Saad, another prospect and a first-round pick or two might get Staal to Chicago.

The Penguins undoubtedly would want to trade Staal to a Western Conference team and the Hawks likewise, with Bolland heading the other way. Maybe it takes another player from the Hawks roster but the Penguins might not want that kind of salary additions assuming Crosby gets big dollars. If they insist on including Nick Leddy or Niklas Hjalmarsson, the Hawks should still do it.

Chicago would undoubtedly want to sign Staal to an extension and could do so after July 1, but they might have their own money issues in trying to get that done. At least they would have up to a year to accomplish it though a perfect scenario would be to have him sign just after trading for him. In fact, he would probably have to for it to be worth it for the Hawks.

The icing to the cake of this trade is the Hawks and Penguins could announce such a deal at the draft in late June. It just happens to be in Pittsburgh.

Remember, it wasn’t long after Gretzky was traded from Edmonton, the Oilers won another Cup. The Hawks could move closer to another one if they can max out the value of Bolland starting with a call to the Penguins.

Link: http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/blackhawks/post/_/id/4671107/hawks-could-improve-by-dealing-bolland?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure it's already been posted. Interesting thought though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "perfect" third line centre, able to grind opponents into the ground and seize shutdown challenges but also put up good offensive production.

Too bad he burned the bridge.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bolland to Van?

Burrows - Bolland - Lapierre

:bigblush:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.