• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Touchet

[Proposal] Vancouver-Columbus

16 posts in this topic

I'll get right to it:

To Vancouver:

D Marc Methot

(GP:46 G:1 A:6 PTS:7 PIM:24 +/ -11)

To Columbus:

D Keith Ballard

(GP:47 G:1 A:6 PTS:7 PIM: 64 +/- 0

Canucks acquire a big bodied defenseman, that despite recent injury troubles has a consistent defensive game and physical edge. The trade also clears 1.2M in cap-space moving forward giving Vancouver a little more breathing room in terms of other off-season signings and transactions whatever they may be.

Columbus gets an underachieving defenseman that has shown in the past he is capable of 30+ points, and he is locked up for the same length as Methot, which is good, as they have had trouble luring any notable players to come/stay with their organization.

Thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Methot has proven he can be a good shutdown guy when healthy. I'd be happy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a good trade-off for both teams and the respective players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard was one of best D-men in the playoffs, and much of the year when he was healthy..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mary...here

Girl%20Scout%20Thin%20Mint%20Cookie%20Blizzard%20July-08.jpg

Great trade by the way.

I do like ballard and this year he has improved but not enough to stay...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do Ballard for rights to Jurcina straight up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

call me mary and get me a blizzard i take it

good trade

straight up

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a fan...we really only clear 1.2 million in cap space...and I still feel that Ballard is the better player by a decent margin.

Its a good, decent proposal but I would sooner keep Ballard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a fan...we really only clear 1.2 million in cap space...and I still feel that Ballard is the better player by a decent margin.

Its a good, decent proposal but I would sooner keep Ballard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.