Cucumber Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 So here it goes. To VAN. Phaneuf. Bozak Brown To TOR. Luongo. Ballard Malhotra Reasons: VAN gets a big physical Dman and A good playmaker for kelser and booth.TOR get a good goalie that should get them to the playoffs a good Top4 DMAN and malhotra that will help their penalty kill and a great defensive 3rd line center Sighings: Morn 1.75 million per year for 3 Schneider 3.5million per year for 5years. Raymond 1million per year for 2years Schultz 1million per year for 3 years Lineup: Sedins borrows. Booth kesler Bozak. Higgins Schroeder Hansen. Moen Lappy brown. Bieksa Hamhuis. Elder phaneuf. Tanev Schultz. Schneider. Lack. This team has skilled size speed and toughness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 How scarier can he get in a Canucks uniform?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Do you know how to make paragraphs and indent? First of all Toronto wouldn't trade their captain and number one Dman, we really have no need for Brown or Bozak. Malhotra also has a Limited NMC, so if Toronto isn't on the list it wont work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 This is actually not that bad, IMO. I could see both teams benefiting from this. We get a good D-man if Salo retires, and Toronto gets the goalie they need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Bunnies Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 I actually wouldn't mind, Phaneuf has 2 years left on his contract and he's a big and very physical defenseman that we could use in the playoffs. With Phaneuf on the team, players will think twice before running at the twins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 5, 2012 Author Share Posted June 5, 2012 We get a big tough Dman in phaneuf a playmaker we need and a tough 4th liner they get a good goalie a good Dman that needs a flesh start and a Good defensive guy coach likes but does phaneuf have a NTC also would they give us bozak they are keeping the 5th pick in the draft that will replace bozak is it even and does both teams cap hits manageable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 phaneuf is known as a cancer in the dressing room and is terrible defensively.....why would we want him again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Swansons Moustache Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 phaneuf is known as a cancer in the dressing room and is terrible defensively.....why would we want him again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 Do you know how to make paragraphs and indent? First of all Toronto wouldn't trade their captain and number one Dman, we really have no need for Brown or Bozak. Malhotra also has a Limited NMC, so if Toronto isn't on the list it wont work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 We get a big tough Dman in phaneuf a playmaker we need and a tough 4th liner they get a good goalie a good Dman that needs a flesh start and a Good defensive guy coach likes but does phaneuf have a NTC also would they give us bozak they are keeping the 5th pick in the draft that will replace bozak is it even and does both teams cap hits manageable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 How scarier can he get in a Canucks uniform?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 I'd do it I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 5, 2012 Author Share Posted June 5, 2012 Why wouldn't you want phaneuf AV can.teach him there is no I in team. what we need is a good Dman that is big that is willing to fight and hit and phaneuf is edler perfect partner Phaneuf >earrhoff He will add something we need it is called. Toughness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 Say what you want, Phaneuf is EXACTLY the type of player this team needs - a big, mean, physical angry defenceman who is great in front of his own net, has a bomb of a shot and is itching to get into the playoffs. But I say this team needs Luongo more than Schneider if it wants to win a Cup right now, so I would propose this: Schneider and Ballard for Phaneuf and Gustafsson. Simply put, Toronto get their star future goalie and experience on the blueline to replace Phaneuf. We get that big physical #1 defenceman we've been looking for and a backup capable of 20 games to relieve Luongo of some fatigue. Sedin - Sedin - Burrows Booth - Kesler - Higgins Jensen - Malhotra - Hansen Bitz - Lapierre - Kassian Edler - Phaneuf Hamhuis - Bieksa Salo - Alberts Tanev Luongo Gustafsson That is already a much bigger, more physical lineup from the forwards to defence to goalies even. Size is clearly how you win in this league nowadays, the more durable the forwards the better and depth up front is key while big strong defencemen are whats needed to contend with the other giant forwards out there. This team would have faired well against the Kings' and Bruins' big forwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 5, 2012 Author Share Posted June 5, 2012 Say what you want, Phaneuf is EXACTLY the type of player this team needs - a big, mean, physical angry defenceman who is great in front of his own net, has a bomb of a shot and is itching to get into the playoffs. But I say this team needs Luongo more than Schneider if it wants to win a Cup right now, so I would propose this: Schneider and Ballard for Phaneuf and Gustafsson. Simply put, Toronto get their star future goalie and experience on the blueline to replace Phaneuf. We get that big physical #1 defenceman we've been looking for and a backup capable of 20 games to relieve Luongo of some fatigue. Sedin - Sedin - Burrows Booth - Kesler - Higgins Jensen - Malhotra - Hansen Bitz - Lapierre - Kassian Edler - Phaneuf Hamhuis - Bieksa Salo - Alberts Tanev Luongo Gustafsson That is already a much bigger, more physical lineup from the forwards to defence to goalies even. Size is clearly how you win in this league nowadays, the more durable the forwards the better and depth up front is key while big strong defencemen are whats needed to contend with the other giant forwards out there. This team would have faired well against the Kings' and Bruins' big forwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHobo73 Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 This is what happens as time goes by playing for the Flames and Leafs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 5, 2012 Author Share Posted June 5, 2012 phaneuf can't be happy in toronto he want to win a cup is that wrong to want to win but the problem he's on a bad team if traded to vancouver he will be happy a great lockeroom guy and will helps us win the cup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 This is actually not that bad, IMO. I could see both teams benefiting from this. We get a good D-man if Salo retires, and Toronto gets the goalie they need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 5, 2012 Author Share Posted June 5, 2012 (As long as Suter's not signed in Detroit yet) let's get Suter! Ryan and Dion are similar in some ways, aggressive, with offensive shot and physicality. The similarity ends there. Ryan's strong defensively, much like his partner Weber, whereas Phaneuf's basically like Bieksa in terms of play in his own end with an overpaid aspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.