theminister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Samjam99 for Eklund?!? Seems pretty even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Seriously, there are so many d!cks on this forum. Honestly, SamJam99 has been posting a lot of rumours lately, true or not, he always has a source and this time it's Mike Gillis! Why all the bashing? He gets info and is kind enough to share it with all of us. Jeez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Bet its a real "blockbuster" like Raymond for a 3rd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Seriously, there are so many d!cks on this forum. Honestly, SamJam99 has been posting a lot of rumours lately, true or not, he always has a source and this time it's Mike Gillis! Why all the bashing? He gets info and is kind enough to share it with all of us. Jeez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Bet its a real "blockbuster" like Raymond for a 3rd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Most likely one of our goalies will get traded on that day. We'll see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sedinaliens2233 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 lol you put this on yourrself. You could have just kept your mouth shut about the whole Luongo to Toronto rumor, but you chose to come to the Canucks Forum and continue to confirm that it's 90% done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Because it's funny to some of us who have noticed him posting MANY useless threads over the last couple of years. And, no, he has not always had a source in the past. Also, you have had problems understanding other user's humour yourself, no? You do tend to take every post seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spotted Zebra Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Anyone think this thread WASNT started by Sam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 I don't have "problems" in understanding peoples humour. Most of these comments are sarcastic idiotic posts, not all, but most. It's actually an interesting topic, no? Care to discuss what the actual post is about? IMO this supposed deal definetely involves Lu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 You've admitted in the past to having a hard time distinguishing sarcasm. Ripping on a guy to has left himself open to, nay invited, criticism is not dickish behaviour, its comedy relief at his expense. If he showed more humility or self-effacing humour he wouldn't get slammed but, alas, he continues to rep himself as an serious insider. That's great ammunition. <br /> There is nothing really to discuss about MG's statement. A big trade will or will not go down. This comes as a surprise to whom exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc44 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 He never said anything about us specifically being involved in a possible block buster just that they happen sometimes at the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Line Juggler Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Samjam99 for Eklund?!? Seems pretty even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 I've admitted in the past? What do you do, creep through all my posts and find that out? And there is no criticism here, it's plain rippin on a guy just becuase he continues to post stuff on here. What's it to you how much he posts here and if he is trying to be an insider or not? Maybe he enjoys doing that stuff and likes to dig up rumours. I find it interesting myself. It is a discussion board, so people are free to rip on him if they want. Go ahead, continue to bash him. I just put out my two cents that is quite wrong, he's just sharing info with you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 That's right. I've been here 9 years just to creep in you. I am actually able to remember the most prolific posters, of which you are one, in your short time here. Others who have been here for many years remember me since I'm of the original guard. Welcome to CDC, dude. You'll learn not to take it so seriously eventually. Because it isn't. Its Stardust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 You must take it seriously if you remeber some posters and note down their personalities. And I don't take CDC seriously. If I took it seriously, I wouldn't have made an accout, trust me. It's where people discuss the NHL and the Canucks more importantly. We're a big community of Canucks fans. Some with more info than others, and some who like to post more than others. I didn't single you out or say anything personal to you. I just made a general comment. You took it "seriously" though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Nope. Just your garden variety savant. You still haven't made a joke. Just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juice Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Gotta love some of the writing in here. "prolific poster" and "I'm of the original guard"... What is this Game of Thrones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamero89 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 By "blockbuster" deal he means he will be wearing a Blockbuster Video t-shirt while he trades Raymond to them for 5 free rentals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.