Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Smashian Kassian

[Discussion] Luongo for Phaneuf

44 posts in this topic

So the Question is.

If you were offered Dion for Lu would you do it?

(I just wanna say I doubt Burke would) But if he was willing to part with him would you want him?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man there has been at least 5 threads like this already. if we cant get the 5th overall than I guess.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like Phaneuf, he could be the big name defencmen that we're missing. But if we get Phaneuf, I would trade Bieksa and sign another right side dman (Garrison).

To STL: Bieksa

To VAN: Perron

To TOR: Lu

To VAN: Phaneuf

Sign Garrison

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Perron-Kesler-Booth

Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen

Weise-Manny-Kassian

Hamhuis-Phaneuf

Edler-Garrison

Ballard-Tanev

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cause Phaneuf can play the Right Side, so this is what I'm thinking.

To Tor: Lu (Possibly more)

To Van: Dion

Edler - Phaneuf

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Ballard - Tanev

You can choose either Eddie-Dion or Hammer-Juice to be the top pair or split time between them, and if Ballard and Tanev can continue the play we saw in the playoffs we would have a reliable defense through pairs 1 to 3.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Copier I had already a thread on this. I would love phaneuf he will bring toughness to our back end which we need

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lu and Raymond for Kulemin and Phaneuf.

Just to get a little more in return.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special.

Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special.

Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special.

Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Schneider, Ballard and our 1st for Phaneuf and Gustafsson

Edler - Phaneuf

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Alberts - Salo

Tanev

Luongo

Gustafsson

That defence is going to win a Cup. It is built for the playoffs. That sort of physicality and size is how you go far, and is the perfect mix of skilled puck-movers (Bieksa, Edler), big shots (Salo, Phaneuf), big hitters (Phaneuf, Edler, Hamhuis, Alberts), solid defensive positioning (Hamhuis, Salo) and great leadership (Salo, Bieksa, Phaneuf).

Keep Luongo, he has playoff experience and has proven himself in big games - Schneider has not and will take a while to gain that experience. Enjoy your cup folks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though he improved somewhat in his own end there is still No way in hell I would want that head hunting sac of garbage on this team . His defensive liability is huge . Phanuef is one of the worst skaters I have ever seen at the defensive position. Ask Calgary fans how bad he was in his own end ? On the Leafs anyone can look good with so many looking bad .

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I'm a cynical a-hole about proposals but the more I think about it the more I would love to have Phaneuf.

He'd thrive in our system with Edler.

Edler - Phaneuf

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Ballard - Salo (Assuming he mostly likely isn't retiring, or pop in Garrison, Alberts or Tanev)

Tanev - Alberts

My counter trade is:

To Toronto:

Luongo (G)

Raymond (F) (RFA)

To Vancouver:

Phaneuf (D)

Gustavsson (G) (UFA)

Even though he improved somewhat in his own end there is still No way in hell I would want that head hunting sac of garbage on this team . His defensive liability is huge . Phanuef is one of the worst skaters I have ever seen at the defensive position. Ask Calgary fans how bad he was in his own end ? On the Leafs anyone can look good with so many looking bad .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd take it. Maybe a little more on both sides to spice it up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I'm a cynical a-hole about proposals but the more I think about it the more I would love to have Phaneuf.

My counter trade is:

To Toronto:

Luongo (G)

Raymond (F) (RFA)

To Vancouver:

Phaneuf (D)

Gustavsson (G)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I'm a cynical a-hole about proposals but the more I think about it the more I would love to have Phaneuf.

He'd thrive in our system with Edler.

Edler - Phaneuf

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Ballard - Salo (Assuming he mostly likely isn't retiring, or pop in Garrison, Alberts or Tanev)

Tanev - Alberts

My counter trade is:

To Toronto:

Luongo (G)

Raymond (F) (RFA)

To Vancouver:

Phaneuf (D)

Gustavsson (G) (UFA)

Unlike Toronto's offense or goaltending.

They have one of the best or deepest defenses in the league.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Know if mg had the guts to propose this to burke

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.