Smashian Kassian Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 So the Question is. If you were offered Dion for Lu would you do it? (I just wanna say I doubt Burke would) But if he was willing to part with him would you want him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 man there has been at least 5 threads like this already. if we cant get the 5th overall than I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 I would like Phaneuf, he could be the big name defencmen that we're missing. But if we get Phaneuf, I would trade Bieksa and sign another right side dman (Garrison). To STL: Bieksa To VAN: Perron To TOR: Lu To VAN: Phaneuf Sign Garrison Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Perron-Kesler-Booth Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen Weise-Manny-Kassian Hamhuis-Phaneuf Edler-Garrison Ballard-Tanev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 14, 2012 Author Share Posted June 14, 2012 Cause Phaneuf can play the Right Side, so this is what I'm thinking. To Tor: Lu (Possibly more) To Van: Dion Edler - Phaneuf Hamhuis - Bieksa Ballard - Tanev You can choose either Eddie-Dion or Hammer-Juice to be the top pair or split time between them, and if Ballard and Tanev can continue the play we saw in the playoffs we would have a reliable defense through pairs 1 to 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Copier I had already a thread on this. I would love phaneuf he will bring toughness to our back end which we need Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Lu and Raymond for Kulemin and Phaneuf. Just to get a little more in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BuckFoston Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special. Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 I'd do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special. Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erkayloomeh Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special. Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 14, 2012 Author Share Posted June 14, 2012 Oh for the sweet love of douchecanoes, you made almost 2,000 posts, you've been here 2 years, you KNOW there have been numerous threads on this trade alone, nevermind all the other infinite TOR/VAN proposals and yet you still make one to feel special. Quit disrespecting the members with your redundancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Schneider, Ballard and our 1st for Phaneuf and Gustafsson Edler - Phaneuf Hamhuis - Bieksa Alberts - Salo Tanev Luongo Gustafsson That defence is going to win a Cup. It is built for the playoffs. That sort of physicality and size is how you go far, and is the perfect mix of skilled puck-movers (Bieksa, Edler), big shots (Salo, Phaneuf), big hitters (Phaneuf, Edler, Hamhuis, Alberts), solid defensive positioning (Hamhuis, Salo) and great leadership (Salo, Bieksa, Phaneuf). Keep Luongo, he has playoff experience and has proven himself in big games - Schneider has not and will take a while to gain that experience. Enjoy your cup folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift-4 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Even though he improved somewhat in his own end there is still No way in hell I would want that head hunting sac of garbage on this team . His defensive liability is huge . Phanuef is one of the worst skaters I have ever seen at the defensive position. Ask Calgary fans how bad he was in his own end ? On the Leafs anyone can look good with so many looking bad . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Normally I'm a cynical a-hole about proposals but the more I think about it the more I would love to have Phaneuf. He'd thrive in our system with Edler. Edler - Phaneuf Hamhuis - Bieksa Ballard - Salo (Assuming he mostly likely isn't retiring, or pop in Garrison, Alberts or Tanev) Tanev - Alberts My counter trade is: To Toronto: Luongo (G) Raymond (F) (RFA) To Vancouver: Phaneuf (D) Gustavsson (G) (UFA) Even though he improved somewhat in his own end there is still No way in hell I would want that head hunting sac of garbage on this team . His defensive liability is huge . Phanuef is one of the worst skaters I have ever seen at the defensive position. Ask Calgary fans how bad he was in his own end ? On the Leafs anyone can look good with so many looking bad . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*vInTaGe* Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 I'd take it. Maybe a little more on both sides to spice it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Normally I'm a cynical a-hole about proposals but the more I think about it the more I would love to have Phaneuf. My counter trade is: To Toronto: Luongo (G) Raymond (F) (RFA) To Vancouver: Phaneuf (D) Gustavsson (G) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Normally I'm a cynical a-hole about proposals but the more I think about it the more I would love to have Phaneuf. He'd thrive in our system with Edler. Edler - Phaneuf Hamhuis - Bieksa Ballard - Salo (Assuming he mostly likely isn't retiring, or pop in Garrison, Alberts or Tanev) Tanev - Alberts My counter trade is: To Toronto: Luongo (G) Raymond (F) (RFA) To Vancouver: Phaneuf (D) Gustavsson (G) (UFA) Unlike Toronto's offense or goaltending. They have one of the best or deepest defenses in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Know if mg had the guts to propose this to burke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Getting mixed opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.