MoneypuckOverlord Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 I don't care how much you hate Luongo.. If it's a deal for Nash, you trade Schneider. Not Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 If you want nash than expect this to cbj luongo or schnieder (most likely schnieder) schnoeder higgins ballard tanev 1st rd 2012 to van nash I wouldnt want him if we are losing so many key parts for now and the furture of our team I would only consider it if they are giving us their 2nd pick of this year draft but they are not trading it lineup sedins nash booth kesler burrows kassian lappy hansen bitz malhotra volpatti bieksa hamhuis edler mag/? salo alberts luongo lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Henrik + Daniel + Kesler +1st for Nash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Henrik + Daniel + Kesler +1st for Nash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 nash is a complementary player earning franchise player money. no forward on the canucks can earn more than a sedin. no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamero89 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Henrik + Daniel + Kesler +1st for Nash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Nash is severely underrated because of his salary. But in an ever-rising cap world, you'll find that salary makes little difference for a cap-spending team. Is Nash an elite player? Yes. Would he make a difference on this team? Hell yes. He is comparable to Perry, but Perry has a bit of a team around him. Put Nash on our team and he'll be superior to Perry. Wooooooooo! Anyway, forget about it happening, but if it does, please forget about his cap hit mattering at all. Cheers. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Systemaddict Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Joking right?!?!?!? ALL 3 of those guys had more points than Nash two seasons ago, two of them had more points than him THIS year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westcoast Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Although I can't see Nash coming to Van,there is a way over the stumbling block some proposals are claiming.ie for example a Luongo,Raymond to Toronto.Schenn,Kadri to Columbus.Nash to Vancouver.,Ballard to Columbus from Van.type of thing. BTW that's not a proposal just a point that Luongo not wanting to go to Columbus can be worked around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHobo73 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I don't know what many of you are talking about, but I'd get a boner if Nash somehow found a way onto our team. Plus, GMMG won't offer anything too ridiculous to get him, so if it works out, he would be worth EVERY PENNY. I can see Nash easily putting up 40+ goals (I wouldn't even be surprised if he consistently hits the 50+ goal mark) playing with the Twins (even if he doesn't mess with them at 5 on 5, he'd still get 40+ playing with Kesler 5 on 5 and with the twins on the PP. He didn't get to play on team Canada's top line in the Olympics (or any other time) for nothing. He is a star amongst stars and would easily make our team the favorite to win 1st in the league (that is if we dont lose the twins, kesler, burrows, bieksa, hamhuis, edler, and one of our two goalies) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHobo73 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I don't know what many of you are talking about, but I'd get a boner if Nash somehow found a way onto our team. Plus, GMMG won't offer anything too ridiculous to get him, so if it works out, he would be worth EVERY PENNY. I can see Nash easily putting up 40+ goals (I wouldn't even be surprised if he consistently hits the 50+ goal mark) playing with the Twins (even if he doesn't mess with them at 5 on 5, he'd still get 40+ playing with Kesler 5 on 5 and with the twins on the PP. He didn't get to play on team Canada's top line in the Olympics (or any other time) for nothing. He is a star amongst stars and would easily make our team the favorite to win 1st in the league (that is if we dont lose the twins, kesler, burrows, bieksa, hamhuis, edler, and one of our two goalies) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHobo73 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I don't know what many of you are talking about, but I'd get a boner if Nash somehow found a way onto our team. Plus, GMMG won't offer anything too ridiculous to get him, so if it works out, he would be worth EVERY PENNY. I can see Nash easily putting up 40+ goals (I wouldn't even be surprised if he consistently hits the 50+ goal mark) playing with the Twins (even if he doesn't mess with them at 5 on 5, he'd still get 40+ playing with Kesler 5 on 5 and with the twins on the PP. He didn't get to play on team Canada's top line in the Olympics (or any other time) for nothing. He is a star amongst stars and would easily make our team the favorite to win 1st in the league (that is if we dont lose the twins, kesler, burrows, bieksa, hamhuis, edler, and one of our two goalies) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 We heard you the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Line Juggler Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 We heard you the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 trade for nash and trade him to the bruins for Lucic and Seidenberg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 How about not killing the team trying to get Nash just trade Scneider and Kesler for Lucic and Bergeron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y2kcanucks Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 nash is a complementary player earning franchise player money. no forward on the canucks can earn more than a sedin. no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allkill326 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 LOL. Why the bleep would we do this????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Bruins don't need Schneider and they probably don't want Kesler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Henrik + Daniel + Kesler +1st for Nash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.