• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CanuckRow

[Rumours/Reports] Official Roberto Luongo Trade Thread (Keep it all here please)

4,357 posts in this topic

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows

Raymond - Kesler - Booth

Higgins - Huberdeau - Hansen

OR

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Garrison - Edler

Gudbranson -

:bigblush:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man if it was

Huberdeau, Theodoer,1st round pick for Luongo,Schroeder, Tanev i think it would be very fair and plus 2 first picks its been awhile for us to have 2 firsts :P granted they might be 25th and 30th but still! :P

Luongo=Huberdeau

Schroeder ? 1st round pick we will have to wait and see

Tanev> Theodoer

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harvey Fialkov@hfialkov

Panthers Bjugstad rejects initial contract offer to turn pro according to source;

Florida Panthers@FlaPanthers

Bjugstad on making decision of whether he'll return to U of M: Probably won't be too long. Probably next week. Need to sit down with family

Of all the top 3 prospects, you would think Bjugstad, given that he may return to college, is the most probable target to be traded.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why ? Bjugstad is the one guy that can walk away from you after the trade via free agency because he took the college route ... Huberdeau is not NHL ready ... Gudbranson remains the #1 target.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why ? Bjugstad is the one guy that can walk away from you after the trade via free agency because he took the college route ... Huberdeau is not NHL ready ... Gudbranson remains the #1 target.

Yes, you are crazy. We're trying to win right now, and only Gudbranson can help right now. Huberdeau is not NHL ready, and will not be a better player than Gudbranson (as in have a bigger impact for his team).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol you're kidding right? Huberdeau has led his team to a champianship... he is NHL ready and Tallon has said that he believes he will be in the NHL this year.... Gudbranson will never happen he is their future plus we need a center since we lost Hodgson.. we already got Garisson we are pretty well of on D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huberdeau was great in his draft year on a stacked team, but this year he was not that great in the Memorial Cup tournament. His stats were inflated due to the empty net goals he scored. He cost his team with timely penalties. He is NHL ready for Florida where their top 6 centers are ... who and who ? He's not NHL ready for Vancouver.

Gudbranson will never happen because he's their future you say? So Huberdeau will be available as a second thought? I guess that means Gudbranson > Huberdeau to even Florida eh?

What's your point? Because that 2nd last sentence really contradicts your saying that you'd prefer Huberdeau over Gudbranson ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why ? Bjugstad is the one guy that can walk away from you after the trade via free agency because he took the college route ... Huberdeau is not NHL ready ... Gudbranson remains the #1 target.

Yes, you are crazy. We're trying to win right now, and only Gudbranson can help right now. Huberdeau is not NHL ready, and will not be a better player than Gudbranson (as in have a bigger impact for his team).

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huberdeau was great in his draft year on a stacked team, but this year he was not that great in the Memorial Cup tournament. His stats were inflated due to the empty net goals he scored. He cost his team with timely penalties. He is NHL ready for Florida where their top 6 centers are ... who and who ? He's not NHL ready for Vancouver.

Gudbranson will never happen because he's their future you say? So Huberdeau will be available as a second thought? I guess that means Gudbranson > Huberdeau to even Florida eh?

What's your point? Because that 2nd last sentence really contradicts your saying that you'd prefer Huberdeau over Gudbranson ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+

I always thought Theodore would be in the mix mainly because of the cap, as salary dump

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whispers going around is tanev, schroeder, luongo are the package heading to FLA. for a young prospect, theodore, 1st rd pick. DT wants tanev after losing garrison. And people say theodore has nixed the deal.Take this with a grain of salt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Tanev is going the other way the Canucks need to get a defenseman back because right now he's slotted as the 6th on the bottom pairing with Bally. We'd be losing a RH shot also.

Very risky move by MG if a defenseman does not come back unless...dare I say...

Shea Weber.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The
are doing so in hopes that the 3 teams will up their bids. As of right now, I am hearing Burke is the most aggressive (cont)

mystery_normal.jpg

(cont) Luongo is in Vegas playing poker so he should be asked to waive his NTC AFTER his tournament.

mystery_normal.jpg

The
are over waiting this thing despite the 3 teams putting pressure on a resolution. They are extending the process by saying(cont

mystery_normal.jpg

(cont) And the
are the team putting most pressure on
to have a resolution in the Luongo file sooner rather than later.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I really care whether a sophomore NHLer on his ELC will want to play on a bottom pairing of an NHL contending team or not? No, because he's signed for 2 more years at a dirt cheap price and will be an RFA for the next little while. And no, Sauve will not work just fine with Ballard. He is not NHL ready.

And the bolded just shows how much knowledge you lack regarding the sport - Ryan Kesler will not move to wing for a goddamn rookie who hasn't proven anything at the professional level against men. He is the 2nd best center on this team and he will not play on anybody's wing except for Henrik on the PP. He's an excellent centerman who is great defensively, great on faceoffs and is a shoot-first player.

Playmaking ability is not a requirement for a center - there are so many other aspects of the position and Ryan has every one of them whereas Huberdeau lacks them all as a rookie. I'd rather have Ryan learn to pass more (only one aspect which lacks in his game) than rely on Huberdeau to learn every other aspect of the game as a rookie center in the NHL.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reported toronto's last offer is Kulemen,Komisarik 1st round pick

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rely on Huberdeau to learn every other aspect of the game as a rookie center in the NHL.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What an fn joke insult that is.

Pull your head out Burke.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, sorry, if that pick is top 10 (which I think it would be) then it's already a steal for Vancouver with Komisarek and Kulemin just being cherries on top. This is Luongo's value.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, sorry, if that pick is top 10 (which I think it would be) then it's already a steal for Vancouver with Komisarek and Kulemin just being cherries on top. This is Luongo's value.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.