• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CanuckRow

[Rumours/Reports] Official Roberto Luongo Trade Thread (Keep it all here please)

4,357 posts in this topic

how is Luongo+tanev for Huberdeau+ delusional? it is actually a very good possibility... they need someone to step into Garissons spot on D and a goalie we need a top 6 play maker (which Huberdeau can be) since we gave up Hodgson upgrading to Huberdeau would be amazing

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think a new CBA would raise Luongos value because in reality we circumvented the cap with his long term deal. If for example they reduce the max length to 5-7 years the average salary will go up because there is no way to circumvent the cap with the shorter term for most players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hubeudeu please. He's got all star written all over him. Gudbranson may never reach his potential offensively, if he ever had any offensive potential. Huberdeau is like a mutated version of Alex Burrows. Never quits, never says die, but with far more superior skill. If its Luongo plus Tanev for Huberdue + we better get on it, asap.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe everyone cries about this teambeing soft and are still clamouring for Huberseau.......Bjugstad is much more in the mold of what MG is looking for...........big, gritty, high end offensive upside, with a solid defensive side........if they could get him out of college, he'd slot right into a 3rd or 4th line C role..........something CH could never do. I'll take Bjugstad over Huberdeau, based on organizational need, every time

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lui for prospects, weber and Doan and that will be a successful summer... Right now shaping up to be a boring off season

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lui for prospects, weber and Doan and that will be a successful summer... Right now shaping up to be a boring off season

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess since the joke didn't ONLY consist of either "are u 90% sure" or "oh no, eklund said we're getting (insert name here) so that means we have zero chance at getting (insert same name here)" the joke went right over everyone's head.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe everyone cries about this teambeing soft and are still clamouring for Huberseau.......Bjugstad is much more in the mold of what MG is looking for...........big, gritty, high end offensive upside, with a solid defensive side........if they could get him out of college, he'd slot right into a 3rd or 4th line C role..........something CH could never do. I'll take Bjugstad over Huberdeau, based on organizational need, every time

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huberdeau looks like he should get NHL time this season - he is an offensive center, ya know, what we didn't have room for? If we plan on having a checking 3rd line center, why would we waste the trade on acquiring a guy we don't have a spot for?

In my view, we do need an offensive 3rd line that is defensively responsible, not just a checking line, so Huberdeau would be great to get here - but it seemed that AV wanted a non talented 3rd line center...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tallon signed Kuba to replace Garrison for short term until his prospects are ready to take on the NHL role. Not sure if they're really looking at defense considering the have a bigger need for goal scoring.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think a new CBA would raise Luongos value because in reality we circumvented the cap with his long term deal. If for example they reduce the max length to 5-7 years the average salary will go up because there is no way to circumvent the cap with the shorter term for most players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this deal is due - this thread needs to be euthanized.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol...... Or what?

Some of you are delusional if you think we're getting huberdeau or gudbranson and if by some small stroke of miracle we do pry one of these guys away from Florida, don't nod your head in justification that you were right. If that were to happen, never question another god damn move gillis makes cause he would be a pimp to pull that off.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a very hard time believing we'll get any of the Panthers top prospects. Of course it could happen but I think there are going to be a lot of disappointed people when the trade actually happens and we see the return.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a very hard time believing we'll get any of the Panthers top prospects. Of course it could happen but I think there are going to be a lot of disappointed people when the trade actually happens and we see the return.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the hockey side of things out. Florida needs a Marquee name to market, Luongo gives them that. MG knows that, so does the ownership group. Exciting young team brings back the best player they ever had = $$$

It's like the return of Linden.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the hockey side of things out. Florida needs a Marquee name to market, Luongo gives them that. MG knows that, so does the ownership group. Exciting young team brings back the best player they ever had = $$$

It's like the return of Linden.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe everyone cries about this teambeing soft and are still clamouring for Huberseau.......Bjugstad is much more in the mold of what MG is looking for...........big, gritty, high end offensive upside, with a solid defensive side........if they could get him out of college, he'd slot right into a 3rd or 4th line C role..........something CH could never do. I'll take Bjugstad over Huberdeau, based on organizational need, every time

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.