• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CanuckRow

[Rumours/Reports] Official Roberto Luongo Trade Thread (Keep it all here please)

4,357 posts in this topic

Looks like the possibility of a Luongo trade to Tor has just got a bit colder ...

Gillis is going to look really desperate once he signs Schneider and he has 2 starting goalies under contract.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canucks didn't want Schenn and for good reasons - changes nothing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canucks didn't want Schenn and for good reasons - changes nothing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@NHLSourcesSay

Oilers and Canucks talking trade, the main component of the deal is Gagner for Luongo, watch this one closely in the next few days.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't sound like Burke is offering anything good.

Sorry Brian, if your secondary players are not good enough for the Leafs they definately won't make the Canucks.

JVR woud be sweet, bad trade for Holmgren.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's safe to say Burke is upset with MG's price for Lu, trades away a key piece to a possible deal, and screws the Leafs and us over. How the Leafs? No Lu = no playoffs. How us? Have both goalies in an uncertain situation. Burke could care less, he knows he'a gonna get fired.

Can 90% think TO is off the Lu list - time to talk with Florida.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@HockeyBreak

Slowly but surely the Vancouver Canucks are making progress on a Roberto Luongo trade. Trade discussions are developing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@NHLSourcesSay

Trading within Lu within the division? Yeah right.

Eeew Sam Gagner coming back the other way? No way I'd want that. Plus I think Edmonton has something good in Dubnyk. Not sure they'd want Luongo.

Didn't GMMG say that he isn't scared of trading within the division if the trade makes the Canucks a better team?

I don't recall but I'd think that if he traded Samuelsson, Hodgson, and Grabner as far away from Vancouver and the Western Conference as possible there's no way he'll keep Luongo in our own division.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MG just needs to wait a little longer Pavelic is in dicussion with Winnipeg and KHL teams this weekend..... If he bolts to the Khl we have a chance for evander kane

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you imagine Edmonton with all their scoring and a solid goalie ... oh my. They instantly make the playoffs ... no matter who they put behind the bench. I didn't think Lui would want to go to Edmonton though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MG just needs to wait a little longer Pavelic is in dicussion with Winnipeg and KHL teams this weekend..... If he bolts to the Khl we have a chance for evander kane

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gagner? Really? We really don't need an undersized forward, esp of we keep Raymond and maybe have Schroeder here next year. The team seems unsure of its identity right now, are we big and tough? Or small speedy and skilled? I think a decision to go bigger and tougher was made with the kassian and booth trades and we need to stay the course (hence why I would've loved Schenn)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Luongo will waive NTC for Winnipeg ... just a hunch.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gagner? Really? We really don't need an undersized forward, esp of we keep Raymond and maybe have Schroeder here next year. The team seems unsure of its identity right now, are we big and tough? Or small speedy and skilled? I think a decision to go bigger and tougher was made with the kassian and booth trades and we need to stay the course (hence why I would've loved Schenn)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I was 100% correct about Schenn being moved but 100% wrong about where he was going.

There is no way we would allow Lu and Komo straight up. No way!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.