Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

alexkidd

[Rumour] Canucks Sharks To Make A Trade?

161 posts in this topic

maybe when we have to make our pick they'll announce something?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sharks are absolutely STACKED on defence with guys the Canucks need:

Burns, Murray, Vandemeer, Braun etc.

We need 2 top-4 defencemen and Burns or Murray would fit the big, physical role we need, especially Murray. Sharks need to get younger and develop some prospects, we need a physical veteran defenceman.

Tanev or a 3rd rounder straight up for Murray.

Ballard and Raymond (why not) for Clowe (big, strong playmaker)

Sedin - Sedin - Booth

Clowe - Kesler - Higgins

Burrows - Lapierre - Hansen

Kassian - Malhotra - Bitz

Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Edler - Murray

Salo - Alberts

Luongo

Schneider

That's a much bigger, physical forward group, a dominantly physical defence and a much sounder defensively squad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sharks are absolutely STACKED on defence with guys the Canucks need:

Burns, Murray, Vandemeer, Braun etc.

We need 2 top-4 defencemen and Burns or Murray would fit the big, physical role we need, especially Murray. Sharks need to get younger and develop some prospects, we need a physical veteran defenceman.

Tanev or a 3rd rounder straight up for Murray.

Ballard and Raymond (why not) for Clowe (big, strong playmaker)

Sedin - Sedin - Booth

Clowe - Kesler - Higgins

Burrows - Lapierre - Hansen

Kassian - Malhotra - Bitz

Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Edler - Murray

Salo - Alberts

Luongo

Schneider

That's a much bigger, physical forward group, a dominantly physical defence and a much sounder defensively squad.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sharks are absolutely STACKED on defence with guys the Canucks need:

Burns, Murray, Vandemeer, Braun etc.

We need 2 top-4 defencemen and Burns or Murray would fit the big, physical role we need, especially Murray. Sharks need to get younger and develop some prospects, we need a physical veteran defenceman.

Tanev or a 3rd rounder straight up for Murray.

Ballard and Raymond (why not) for Clowe (big, strong playmaker)

Sedin - Sedin - Booth

Clowe - Kesler - Higgins

Burrows - Lapierre - Hansen

Kassian - Malhotra - Bitz

Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Edler - Murray

Salo - Alberts

Luongo

Schneider

That's a much bigger, physical forward group, a dominantly physical defence and a much sounder defensively squad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only trade that was going to happen today would have involved us giving a pick, not taking one.

Gillis wants guys to play NOW, not a couple years from now, so we obviously weren't trying to trade up.

Hockey trades are definitely still possible in these next rounds, as teams are focusing on specific players and positional needs.

If we had something with San Jose, then I doubt it's dead.

If we didn't, then as Bush said,"Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, can't fool me again."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we didn't, then as Bush said,"Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, can't fool me again."

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering how this started with a nothing post on twitter, i'm kinda surprised at the length of this thread. Nothing happened on the trade front with this team today. On account Gillis cannot take on a salary dump at this point, and he doesn't want to give up a salary either unless his team actually improves. That'll take some time. Cheers.

TOML

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's so much wrong with this post I don't even know where to start.

First-Stacked with guys we need and you mention Vandermeer and Braun?!! WTF?!!

Second-Why would SJ trade Murray for another more inexperienced, less physical defenseman?!

Third-Why would SJ trade their only big top 6 winger for a somewhat overpriced defenseman and a faltering RFA in Raymond?!

Epic fail.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Murray has lost a step by all accounts and Clowe is far superior to Raymond for when the games matter.

I hope Raymond improves, but we'll see.

I wouldn't turn Murray away if he was rebuildable, but we'll see.

I think Wilson is done with giving us good players for nothing. Cheers.

TOML

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Douglas Murray would be a good upgrade at d size-wise. But why would SJ move him of all their d-men? And for anything you've mentioned here, Ballard, Raymond, Tanev? And the funniest of all - a 3rd rounder or Tanev straight up for Murray. Really? Does trading look and sound that easy to you? :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the funniest of all - a 3rd rounder or Tanev straight up for Murray. Really? Does trading look and sound that easy to you? :lol:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What people are saying about Clowe now (ie. Raymond is just as good or Clowe is not as good, Clowe had a horrible year) is similar to what some have been saying about Booth last year. Where's Booth now?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What people are saying about Clowe now (ie. Raymond is just as good or Clowe is not as good, Clowe had a horrible year) is similar to what some have been saying about Booth last year. Where's Booth now?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.