guesswhere Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Pretty obvious. I didn't want Schenn coming to play for vancouver, but I wouldn't have minded if we were part of a 3 way with tor/phil with jvr coming here and schenn going to the flyers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GradinToSmyl Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 I wonder if it was true that Schenn was offered Straight up for Luongo like Jason Botchford or whatever said. Imagine if we swapped him for JVR. JVR is exactly what the Canucks need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2009cupchamps Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 First of all Iam not a Luke Schenn fan, but everyone on here say he is worth nothing no nothing about hockey. He is 23 years old and has already played 4 years in the NHL, while most D-men do not mature until 27 years of age. Add that in with the fact that Toronto has destroyed the kids confidence. He will be a good d-man in this league for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHobo73 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Grateful? I am so delighted he is no longer on the Leafs. Thank god. Sick and tired of stupid Canucks fans willing to settle for Schenn. Sure he's tough, and hits, but a huge defensive liablity. Lets just put it this way, he's not even as good as Keith Ballard right now overall. He's young, and better long term value, but even Keith Ballard is not as defensively liable. So glad he's gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 one of the sports panel members, said that schenn can't pivot to the right, so gets beat by players going around his right side....he'ld be on the bench a lot here..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Schenn was a great return piece as a part of a package, so no, I'm not grateful. The only defenseman that interests me now out of TOR and FLA is FLA's Erik Gudbranson - though he would have been my #1 target all along ... It's just Schenn would have been easier to pry out of the team ... And you are obviously not that bright. Had Schenn been still available, that makes TOR look more stronger as a trade partner - forcing other teams that have interest to step up their offers. Now that TOR - a major competitor for Luongo - doesn't have Schenn, their offer gets weaker (maybe Franson), hence other teams may feel they don't need to strengthen their offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbal23 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 on tsn it said that burke thought that the asking price for lu is way too high. he was quoted to saying that he doesnt want to throw half the team just to get a goalie. Gillis making me proud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Will be even more grateful when the Leafs as a whole are off the market / not an option. The only downside with Schenn being out of the picture will be the Kadri, Komisarek, etc etc names propping up. No Leafs. No thanks. Hey Dale Tallon, what are you up to this weekend? Getting serious about this Luongo deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHobo73 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 First of all Iam not a Luke Schenn fan, but everyone on here say he is worth nothing no nothing about hockey. He is 23 years old and has already played 4 years in the NHL, while most D-men do not mature until 27 years of age. Add that in with the fact that Toronto has destroyed the kids confidence. He will be a good d-man in this league for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckrelevantname Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Kinda interesting how the two largest trades over the past two days involve teams reuniting brothers. Staal's and Schenn's. Neither sets are twins, but what team wouldn't want a brother combo after seeing how well our mavericks function together on the same team! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonimator#19 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 on tsn it said that burke thought that the asking price for lu is way too high. he was quoted to saying that he doesnt want to throw half the team just to get a goalie. Gillis making me proud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinTelepathy Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 I smell Bobby Ryan... booth, raymond and a 3rd for bobby ryan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BuckFoston Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 And since your a part of CDC by extension of your comment it would make you just as wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GradinToSmyl Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Who is sometimes wrong, but never sniffed enough glue to think a Schenn for Luongo deal was to go down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GradinToSmyl Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 I smell Bobby Ryan... booth, raymond and a 3rd for bobby ryan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckelhead70 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 on tsn it said that burke thought that the asking price for lu is way too high. he was quoted to saying that he doesnt want to throw half the team just to get a goalie. Gillis making me proud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GradinToSmyl Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Burke is full of hot air and BS. Thinking he'll be able to get one of the top 5 goalies in the last 5 years for a couple of draft picks. Seeing how the Leafs have 15 players that are untouchable in his opinion what did he think the Canucks were going to be interested in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BuckFoston Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 If you are giving out grammar lessons you should work on that sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Just in. Lu for Schenn + is 99.99% done. details to follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GradinToSmyl Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 There is nothing wrong with the grammar in that sentence. What it needs is better sentence structure and maybe punctuation. As in: I am the mighty Buck Foston, who is never wrong, but never sniffed enough glue to thing a Schenn for Luongo deal was to go down. There you go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.2e0e62afe0ad1b9cde08681e4c6691b9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.