Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hockeyfan90

Van-Chi

20 posts in this topic

Luongo for Hossa straight up. It's the perfect trade I find. Both really long contracts with similar cap hit around 5 million per season, and in terms of age both are 33. Plus its fits both team's needs. Chicago needs a goalie and they get that in Luongo and Canucks need a Top 6 player and we get that in Hossa.

A line with Booth-Kesler-Hossa would be sick.

Bad contract for bad contract very fair.

It's better than what others were suggesting taking in Komisarek from Toronto :picard: . At least Hossa can still produce and be effective

Oops sorry about putting this in the wrong forum

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to take a lot more to get Hossa, and you posted this in the wrong place

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to take a lot more to get Hossa, and you posted this in the wrong place

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Canucks are getting rid of a 10 year contract, why would they be in such a rush to take on another 10 year contract?

I seriously doubt MG would be so inclined as to climb out of one hole and right back into another.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would it take a lot more...explain...I don't think it would and Chicago would do this trade.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hossa is arguably their best forward, and there is no replacement for him. Luongo is good, but the Hawks wouldn't give the Canucks Hossa, knowing that Schneider can easily replace Luongo.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luongo for Komisarek and Luongo for Hossa are equally ridiculous suggestions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Canucks are getting rid of a 10 year contract, why would they be in such a rush to take on another 10 year contract?

I seriously doubt MG would be so inclined as to climb out of one hole and right back into another.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hossa's current status means his cap hit will go away? But it also means he could retire early, meaning we'd get nothing for Luongo and help out the Hawks.

In the meantime, Yeeeeeee-Haaaaaawwww HOSSA! He's a 3-time cup finalist.

TOML

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hossa's current status means his cap hit will go away? But it also means he could retire early, meaning we'd get nothing for Luongo and help out the Hawks.

In the meantime, Yeeeeeee-Haaaaaawwww HOSSA! He's a 3-time cup finalist.

TOML

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm as optimistic as getting someone good for Luongo as anybody else here, but most of you guys are delusional. You guys are going to be sadly surprised at how little he picks us up. He's not a 23 year old goalie entering his prime with a 3 year contract. Hell, we gave "nothing" to get him when he was in him prime. I hope we get something nice back, but at this point, it's not why we need to get rid of him. I think if we could fetch someone good, we already would have traded him. The idea of him going to chicago is also laughable. Chicago thinks he is awful, along with most of the NHL, and they aren't entirely wrong. Remember that thing the rat Bolland said about having ZERO current canucks on their team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hossa's current status means his cap hit will go away? But it also means he could retire early, meaning we'd get nothing for Luongo and help out the Hawks.

In the meantime, Yeeeeeee-Haaaaaawwww HOSSA! He's a 3-time cup finalist.

TOML

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not likely going to happen but one can dream you have sound principles but with exception Luo does not mean to the hawks what hossa means to us

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea look at how hard its been for Gillis to get a good trading deal for Luongo...its because of his contract! You guys are all blind man seriously you think teams would just take on a long ass contract for nothing? If so Gomez and Horcoff would've been traded by now

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea look at how hard its been for Gillis to get a good trading deal for Luongo...its because of his contract! You guys are all blind man seriously you think teams would just take on a long ass contract for nothing? If so Gomez and Horcoff would've been traded by now

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a line of booth, kesler, and hossa would look good.... on paper. we need a set up man on the 2nd line, all 3 of those guys isnt really a passer. so thats a problem.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hossa is arguably their best forward, and there is no replacement for him. Luongo is good, but the Hawks wouldn't give the Canucks Hossa, knowing that Schneider can easily replace Luongo.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.