Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Dan Hamhuis: Behind the Norris Trophy scenes


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
17 replies to this topic

#1 bure's triple deke

bure's triple deke

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  • Joined: 19-May 12

Posted 29 June 2012 - 06:41 PM

Been a while since my last blog post... Read below or see it with all the glitz and glamour here: http://burestriplede...phy-scenes.html

Behind the Norris Trophy scenes

This post may be about a week too late, but this is the off-season, man... I exhibit no guilt in being two major NHL events behind. Hopefully you don't mind.

Try, if you will, to suspend all current thoughts swirling in your head about Brendan Gaunce and Pavel Bure. Then see if you can recall all of nine days ago, when the NHL doled out their annual awards, celebrating the league's very best with the utterly irrelevant esteemed likes of Matthew Perry and Nickelback. But forget the telecast. If you were wise enough to watch something else last Wednesday, perhaps, like me, you opted to simply review the voting results online. If you are lucky enough to actually locate it, the full results for each trophy – down to every last fifth-place vote – are a resource that can sustain your attention far longer than the actual awards broadcast.

While it's always interesting to see just how close or distant the voting was between the winner and two runners-up, often times the more intriguing results are found after the top three. Case in point is the balloting for this year's Norris Trophy.




Posted Image


Among the many ways one could hyper-analyze this list beyond the three nominees, here are just a couple to start with: At fourth overall, Alex Pietrangelo has achieved elite status in just his second year in the NHL. (Can anyone remember at which point in the season that actually happened? I cannot.) That accomplishment segways nicely into the complete absence of Drew Doughty on this list, which effectively contrasts his regular season performance from that of the playoffs. While not one of 149 voters thought he ranked among the league's top five defencemen this regular season, by the time he was lifting the Stanley Cup two months later, he was probably in a two-way tie with Dustin Brown for Conn Smythe runner-up.

But this article is about neither Pietrangelo or Doughty. Unlike last June, there was literally nothing for Canucks fans to get excited about for this year's NHL Awards. So if you're looking for a consolation prize, Vancouver, you did indeed see correctly: At 10th overall in Norris voting, the Professional Hockey Writers' Association (PHWA)¹ gives you the Canucks' own, Dan Hamhuis.

While it's admittedly hard to get excited about a 10th overall ranking – from one perspective, it highlights the longstanding absence of a Canucks defenceman actually capable of winning the Norris – consider the names that Hamhuis finished ahead of: Duncan Keith. Keith Yandle. Dan Boyle. All three defencemen enjoy far higher profiles and the implicit expectation to produce 50-60 points a season. Mind you, none of them had particularly great seasons by their own personal standards, but they all recorded more points than Hamhuis and are no slouches in their own end. The fact that the NHL's writers collectively voted Hamhuis ahead of those three offensive juggernauts speaks volumes for his defensively-responsible game. (It's also interesting to note that Alex Edler, who Canucks fans chose over Hamhuis for the Babe Pratt Trophy as the team's best defenceman, finished 15th.)

With a $4.5 million cap hit, Hamhuis doesn't exactly fly under the radar, but his style of play has seldom attracted the league-wide attention it deserves. At 23 points over 64 games in his first season with the Canucks, he did not draw a single voting point in 2011, when he was arguably just as valuable to the team's back-end. So while Hamhuis' real vote-getter was presumably his defensive game, the 14-point improvement in his statline certainly helped to attract more attention to it.

I anticipate that many outside of Vancouver would argue that Hamhuis' name on the above list is no more than an outlier...an anomaly. To that, I would first give to them Dan Girardi's two first-place votes to figure out. If Hamhuis is an anomaly, then Girardi at sixth overall is... what? A UFO sighting? But mostly, I'd accuse them of something we're probably all guilty of. The fact is, we will always overlook sound and reliable defence in favour of flashier end-to-end rushes and more explicit point totals. While the PHWA gave Hamhuis his due (two second-place votes), by awarding Erik Karlsson the Norris (66 of 149 first-place votes), they also implied that, in expert hockey wisdom, you don't have to be world class in your own end to be deemed the best defenceman.

There is really no objective way of quantifying a player of Hamhuis' ilk in the same way that points do for an offensive defenceman. It's a subjective call, which likely gives the powers-that-be a little less confidence in voting for a stay-at-homer. The league awards the Selke for the equally subjective best defensive forward; why not establish a new trophy (to go with a long overdue one for the assists leader) for the best defensive defenceman?

Call it the Rod Langway Trophy, in honour of the Montreal Canadiens/Washington Capitals shutdown defender from the 1980's.² Then sit back and just watch the nomination pour in for number two in blue and white.

-HC

¹ The PHWA is responsible for picking the Norris Trophy, as well as six other major NHL awards.
² Langway accomplished the rare feat of winning the Norris Trophy in back-to-back years (1983 and 1984) as a shutdown defender. In his award-winning seasons, he scored no more than 32 and 33 points.


Edited by bure's triple deke, 29 June 2012 - 06:45 PM.


#2 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,272 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 29 June 2012 - 06:44 PM

I like Bieksa and all, but who on Earth voted him to be 5th for the Norris? :blink:

Jagermeister.jpg


#3 ButterBean

ButterBean

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,228 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 09

Posted 29 June 2012 - 06:54 PM

I'm really surprised to see Bieksa that high. Maybe because he got lots of points this year.

#4 marinated.pea

marinated.pea

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,566 posts
  • Joined: 26-March 08

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:01 PM

Nice to see three of our boys wrangle in some votes :)
Posted Image

#5 EDLER.IS.BEAST

EDLER.IS.BEAST

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,310 posts
  • Joined: 03-March 11

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:09 PM

Looks like Bieksa threatened some NHLPA members

#6 FlyLow_

FlyLow_

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,136 posts
  • Joined: 10-April 10

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:30 PM

bieksa being on that list calls to question it's relevance, however Hammer is a hell of a d-man and I hope he's with us for the rest of his career. Hopefully we can bring in another beast defender so he's not completely responsible for shutting down anyone good.

#7 kj29

kj29

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 968 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 12

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:31 PM

bieksa ahead of mitchell and edler behind mitchell! :blink:

o5udj8.jpg

 

medium.jpg CDCFL medium.jpg CDCEHL medium.jpg CDCSTHS

 

*Commissioner of CDCYHL*


#8 thehamburglar

thehamburglar

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,282 posts
  • Joined: 21-April 10

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:43 PM

Crazy but pretty cool actually.
Posted Image

#9 Millennium

Millennium

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 09

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:50 PM

That's a really well thought-out article. I enjoyed the read, thanks =).

As you said, the Norris trophy is based on points and it seems none of our defencemen will ever win it, but it is good to see ours recognized.

The thing that stands out for me most is counting the presence of teams. NYR and VAN have most on that list with 3. Goes to show even though we don't have a Weber or Chara, our depth still stands out.

#10 Danthecanucksfan

Danthecanucksfan

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,363 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 12

Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:56 PM

Thank you for the read

#11 Milk Hot Dog

Milk Hot Dog

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 719 posts
  • Joined: 30-December 11

Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:08 PM

Juice has a secret admirer
Nobody beats our Canucks' meat !

I don't typically make New Year's Resolutions, but the one thing I want to accomplish in 2012, aka the year of the MILK HOT DOG, is to ARREST SOMEONE. - Kevin WOLVERINE Bieksa (BEE-ecks-ah)


#12 G-52

G-52

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 694 posts
  • Joined: 29-April 12

Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:03 PM

interesting

Edited by clidefrog, 29 June 2012 - 09:04 PM.

Posted Image


#13 Edlerberry

Edlerberry

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,245 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12

Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:34 PM

I'm really surprised to see Bieksa that high. Maybe because he got lots of points this year.

lol one fifth place vote.
July 7-2013

Toronto will take a step back next year.
Feel free to quote me.


July 8-2013

Wow I can't believe peoples replies...
Im done here. You people are disgusting..


#14 uber_pwnzor

uber_pwnzor

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,451 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 11

Posted 29 June 2012 - 11:27 PM

Kinda cool that we have three of the 20 best defense men in the league...

#15 bure's triple deke

bure's triple deke

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  • Joined: 19-May 12

Posted 30 June 2012 - 01:58 AM

bieksa being on that list calls to question it's relevance, however Hammer is a hell of a d-man and I hope he's with us for the rest of his career. Hopefully we can bring in another beast defender so he's not completely responsible for shutting down anyone good.


I wouldn't disregard the entire list just cause Bieksa got a fifth-place vote. Feel free to disregard that specific member of the Writers Association though..

#16 crosbyheadshot

crosbyheadshot

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 131 posts
  • Joined: 08-December 11

Posted 30 June 2012 - 08:46 AM

Great read! Especially after all the s****y threads lately

#17 Blömqvist

Blömqvist

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,410 posts
  • Joined: 03-October 09

Posted 30 June 2012 - 10:23 AM

IIRC when Ehrhoff was here he was in the top 10. Imagine if we still had him... our top 4 would all be within the top 20!

Great job by Hammer. He really is our backbone on D. We can survive without Salo or Bieksa or Edler or Ballard, but once Hamhuis is goes down our defense falls apart.

Every pizza is a personal pizza if you try hard enough and believe in yourself.


#18 bure's triple deke

bure's triple deke

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  • Joined: 19-May 12

Posted 01 July 2012 - 02:46 PM

IIRC when Ehrhoff was here he was in the top 10. Imagine if we still had him... our top 4 would all be within the top 20!

Great job by Hammer. He really is our backbone on D. We can survive without Salo or Bieksa or Edler or Ballard, but once Hamhuis goes down our defense falls apart.


Mmhm. SCF...




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.