Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

[Signing] Florida Signs Scott Clemmensen


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 Alex the Great

Alex the Great

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,765 posts
  • Joined: 17-April 12

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:27 AM

@StevenEllisNHL: The Florida Panthers have signed Scott Clemmensen to a 2 year, $2.4M deal.

Edited by Pekka Rinne, 01 July 2012 - 08:28 AM.

  • 0

#2 SeaBass

SeaBass

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 324 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 08

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:28 AM

So much for Luongo to Florida....
  • 0

#3 Drive-By Body Pierce

Drive-By Body Pierce

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,964 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 08

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:30 AM

3-man rotation in the FLA crease? Luongo-Clemmensen-Markstrom. ;) Also gives some depth for when Clemmensen/Markstrom are collectively injured for half to three quarters of the season.
  • 0

Posted Image


#4 Islandboss

Islandboss

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 496 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:33 AM

So much for our management.I'd be pretty pissed right now if I was Aquilini.It appears Gillis is burying this team in a dramatic mess quite the same as Burke and the leafs.
  • 2
A statistician is a person who draws a mathematically precise line from an unwarranted assumption to a foregone conclusion.

Kelly is a great gal

#5 Bombastik der Teutone

Bombastik der Teutone

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,197 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 07

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:37 AM

Theodore
Clemmensen
Markstrom


i guess Theo or Markstrom could be on the move...or ???

Edited by TheGermanCanuck, 01 July 2012 - 08:41 AM.

  • 0

Posted Image


Credits to Vintage Canuck @ 2014


Regular Season


Posted ImageCDCGML St.Louis Blues RosterPosted Image


#6 Capt.Awesome

Capt.Awesome

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,282 posts
  • Joined: 27-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:43 AM

So much for our management.I'd be pretty pissed right now if I was Aquilini.It appears Gillis is burying this team in a dramatic mess quite the same as Burke and the leafs.



Such a stupid post!

CDC is a joke with this kind of crap being posted consistently.

You don't deserve to be a hockey fan.
  • 1
<img src="http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i212/IamAppreciated/GSPNip2.gif" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />


I hate this place.

#7 Canucks_fo_life

Canucks_fo_life

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,538 posts
  • Joined: 07-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:47 AM

Maybe Clemmenson is coming back this way in a trade
  • 0
I rather lose with the Canucks, than win with any other team

This is OUR year

GO CANUCKS GOOOOOO!!!!!!!

#8 Islandboss

Islandboss

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 496 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:47 AM

Such a stupid post!

CDC is a joke with this kind of crap being posted consistently.

You don't deserve to be a hockey fan.


Nice personal attack from behind your monitor you little puke,I'll send you a address come slander me personally and well sort this out.
  • 4
A statistician is a person who draws a mathematically precise line from an unwarranted assumption to a foregone conclusion.

Kelly is a great gal

#9 TheInsideScoop

TheInsideScoop

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,457 posts
  • Joined: 29-January 08

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:48 AM

Well it has been mentioned several times that FLA would want us to take Theodore back in a trade. They still need to sign a back-up goalie.

Also, with their injuries it probably is not a bad thing to have depth.

However, I do agree tat MG should finish this deed soon.
  • 0

#10 TheInsideScoop

TheInsideScoop

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,457 posts
  • Joined: 29-January 08

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:49 AM

Nice personal attack from behind your monitor you little puke,I'll send you a address come slander me personally and well sort this out.


hahahahah really? That's a little intense for a hockey forum isn't it?
  • 0

#11 hsedin33

hsedin33

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,427 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 10

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:51 AM

hahahahah really? That's a little intense for a hockey forum isn't it?


Did you read your post? I thought that was a little intense..
  • 0

#12 Special Ed

Special Ed

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,255 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:51 AM

Still a possibility that we go into the season with both goalies. The only people that can be angry about that, are the ones foolish enough to act as though Luongo had already been traded since the playoffs.
  • 0

If you like looking at statistics to determine who's better, you're just a casual fan.

2.41 season GAA isn't very impressive. Let's not get into playoffs and his SV%.

Cory Schneider is the next Patrick Roy.


#13 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,935 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:54 AM

Nice personal attack from behind your monitor you little puke,I'll send you a address come slander me personally and well sort this out.


:bigblush:

OK tough guy settle down ya little hypocrite.

Your comment however was silly. Clemmensen; a backup goalie in Florida, gets signed and your thought process (term used lightly) brings you to the owner of the Canucks being angry at the GM of the Canucks.
  • 1
Posted Image
Posted Image

#14 King of the ES

King of the ES

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,272 posts
  • Joined: 27-May 12

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:54 AM

Still a possibility that we go into the season with both goalies. The only people that can be angry about that, are the ones foolish enough to act as though Luongo had already been traded since the playoffs.


The guy who asked for a trade, and the guy who signed an extension under the assumption that the other guy was going to be dealt, might also be angry about that.
  • 0

#15 canucks3322

canucks3322

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,183 posts
  • Joined: 20-February 11

Posted 01 July 2012 - 08:57 AM

So much for our management.I'd be pretty pissed right now if I was Aquilini.It appears Gillis is burying this team in a dramatic mess quite the same as Burke and the leafs.


LOL your pissed that Florida signed a backup goalie? how does that affect if their going to trade for Luongo? relax take a chill pill let MG do whats best he's not stupid ...
  • 0

#16 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,935 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:00 AM

Still a possibility that we go into the season with both goalies. The only people that can be angry about that, are the ones foolish enough to act as though Luongo had already been traded since the playoffs.

The thing is that almost everything is still a possibility.

All this insider garbage and "leaked" bull**** is just that; garbage and bull****. As far as we know the reality may be that Florida has never been a main player for Luongo at all.

As fans we make guesses and assumptions based on information that is overall pretty worthless.

We could have both goaltenders going into the season. We could still trade either goalie and only have 1 of them and if that happens either of them could still go anywhere for all we know.
  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image

#17 Special Ed

Special Ed

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,255 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:00 AM

The guy who asked for a trade, and the guy who signed an extension under the assumption that the other guy was going to be dealt, might also be angry about that.


Who asked for a trade? Source and quote please. Where did anyone say 'I want to be traded'. If anything luongo was giving us options by saying he was willing to bypass the NTC. More of a respectful move to Cory Schneider and the Canucks if they want to move him. A really class act move and not at all a demand to be traded to me.
  • 1

If you like looking at statistics to determine who's better, you're just a casual fan.

2.41 season GAA isn't very impressive. Let's not get into playoffs and his SV%.

Cory Schneider is the next Patrick Roy.


#18 Bombastik der Teutone

Bombastik der Teutone

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,197 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 07

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:00 AM

Well it has been mentioned several times that FLA would want us to take Theodore back in a trade. They still need to sign a back-up goalie.

Also, with their injuries it probably is not a bad thing to have depth.

However, I do agree tat MG should finish this deed soon.


i wouldnt mind a schneider/theodore tandem theo is still solid and i dont think its a good idea to give cory 70+ starts in his first full season..could imagine theo getting 20-25 startslui/clemmensen would be also a good tandem ..markstrom may needs one more zear in the minors..and well he has to stay healthy
  • 0

Posted Image


Credits to Vintage Canuck @ 2014


Regular Season


Posted ImageCDCGML St.Louis Blues RosterPosted Image


#19 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,935 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:01 AM

The guy who asked for a trade, and the guy who signed an extension under the assumption that the other guy was going to be dealt, might also be angry about that.

Did he ask for a trade? Is your assumption of his assumption accurate?
  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image

#20 sampy

sampy

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,982 posts
  • Joined: 05-May 07

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:03 AM

Good, because the Nucks need a goalie comin back. Clemensen or Theodore would be a great back up to Schneid.
  • 0

#21 Boudrias

Boudrias

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,636 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:06 AM

i wouldnt mind a schneider/theodore tandem theo is still solid and i dont think its a good idea to give cory 70+ starts in his first full season..could imagine theo getting 20-25 startslui/clemmensen would be also a good tandem ..markstrom may needs one more zear in the minors..and well he has to stay healthy

What I have heard about Markstrom is health issues with his knees. He was an all-star in the AHL as he and Lack battled back and forth. Another year in the AHL is quite possible.
  • 0

#22 King of the ES

King of the ES

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,272 posts
  • Joined: 27-May 12

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:16 AM

Did he ask for a trade? Is your assumption of his assumption accurate?


I can't offer proof that Rick Nash has asked for a trade out of Columbus, either, so I guess that's all just a bunch of horse crap, as well?
  • 0

#23 oldnews

oldnews

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,151 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:20 AM

The Clemmensen signing does not indicate that Florida is not going to acquire Luongo - he is the guy they are likely to keep as their backup. Theodore only has a year left on his contract. If anything this signing is a good sign - it means that they think Markstrom is at least two years from NHL ready. It may also indicate they don't see Brodeur as a likely option - if they sign him they have three guys under contract in addition to Clemmensen - if they acquire Luongo, there is a good chance they send Theodore back the other way (they could still move Theodore in a separate move, but the Clemmensen signing really doesn't effect their interest in Luongo).
  • 0

#24 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,935 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:30 AM

I can't offer proof that Rick Nash has asked for a trade out of Columbus, either, so I guess that's all just a bunch of horse crap, as well?


Wow what a wonderful argument you've made there. :rolleyes:

I'm not saying it's not necessarily true I'm just saying we don't know what is true and what is garbage. Presenting it as anything but bull**** assumptions based on nothing substantial is foolish. Again...that doesn't mean it's not true it just means that you don't really have any clue if Luongo "asked" for a trade (and in fact there's no real info out there that says he has) and you also have no clue what Schneider is assuming. Schneider may be expecting something based on what he was told in negotiations but we don't know that either...do we?

Edited by EmployeeoftheMonth, 01 July 2012 - 09:36 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image

#25 King of the ES

King of the ES

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,272 posts
  • Joined: 27-May 12

Posted 01 July 2012 - 10:05 AM

Wow what a wonderful argument you've made there. :rolleyes:

I'm not saying it's not necessarily true I'm just saying we don't know what is true and what is garbage. Presenting it as anything but bull**** assumptions based on nothing substantial is foolish. Again...that doesn't mean it's not true it just means that you don't really have any clue if Luongo "asked" for a trade (and in fact there's no real info out there that says he has) and you also have no clue what Schneider is assuming. Schneider may be expecting something based on what he was told in negotiations but we don't know that either...do we?


Do you think either Luongo or Schneider would have a problem with both guys being brought back to share the crease?
  • 0

#26 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,935 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 01 July 2012 - 10:44 AM

Do you think either Luongo or Schneider would have a problem with both guys being brought back to share the crease?


I think they both want to be starting goaltenders in this league and I think that means neither of them want to be backups or part of tandems. (more so Luongo) I also think that the team probably doesn't want almost 10 million in cap space spent on 2 goalies. Now...just because I think that or you think whatever it is you think that does not make it reality.

Do you know that Luongo asked for a trade? Do you know that your assumption about Schneiders assumption is accurtate? If you know those things that fine. I think you can probably say the Schneider assumption is a pretty educated guess; key word guess. However there is nothing to suggest Luongo has asked for a trade. Everything I've seen has intimated that he has agreed to waive his NTC and one thing has guaranteed that he is open to waiving his NTC which was when he himself said he would waive it. I've never seen anything credible that has said he has requested a trade.

I'm not sure I'm getting my message across.? I mean asking me what I "think" doesn't seem like a sound argument given what I've said.

Edited by EmployeeoftheMonth, 01 July 2012 - 10:55 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.