Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Mike Commodore

Value Of

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic

#1 L'Orange

L'Orange

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,193 posts
  • Joined: 12-November 11

Posted 10 July 2012 - 06:16 PM

UFA - Mike Commodore - $1.7 M

6'4" 228. Is willing to throw down when necessary.

Might he be a good acquisition depth defenseman? A better, tougher version of Andrew Alberts.

Thoughts?
Posted Image

#2 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,632 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 10 July 2012 - 06:17 PM

Could be good for depth but there are other options out there. I think we should go for one of Colin White or Steve Eminger
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#3 aliboy

aliboy

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,164 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 07

Posted 10 July 2012 - 06:22 PM

I used to be a big fan, but it's time for Mike to retire. Also, he is not a good fighter.

#4 Danthecanucksfan

Danthecanucksfan

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,363 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 12

Posted 10 July 2012 - 06:35 PM

good for the 3rd D pairing/ depth

#5 Kack Zassian

Kack Zassian

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,240 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 12

Posted 10 July 2012 - 07:40 PM

I would rather try to throw a league minimum deal at Jeff Finger and see if he could stick as a #6-7 guy.

Kurtis Foster may not be horrible next to Tanev on the 3rd pair. Big body with some offensive upside (if Ballard is moved).

Brett Clark and Scott Hannan would also be solid bottom pairing depth options.

#6 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,473 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 10 July 2012 - 07:49 PM

I thought that was a steal of a deal at $1M for Detroit last year, but he hardly did anything and didn't play very much before they dumped him to Tampa for a conditional 7th. If even Detroit doesn't want you back (and they've lost Lidstrom to retirement and Stuart wanted to go back to Cali) then we could probably do better.

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

If this team lets go of Sang he will burn this team next year. 

 


#7 Dion Phaneuf

Dion Phaneuf

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,135 posts
  • Joined: 05-May 12

Posted 10 July 2012 - 09:06 PM

Past his prime, no thanks.

* IMO he should retire

gallery_47851_23_84084.png

medium.png - CDCGML medium.png - RGMG medium.png - STHS medium.png - CDCFL


#8 canucklehead44

canucklehead44

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,813 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 03

Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:39 PM

I'd take him at 750K. He was a plus player last year. He has size, hits, and is willing to drop the gloves. He fights a lot of heavyweights, usually doesn't win but can hold his own. Can beat most middle weight guys. He was a pretty good player at one point, I think he still has more talent than a pure goon.
Sig too big.




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.