• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ConstableSidhu

(Rumor) Canucks interested in Cristobal Huet

63 posts in this topic

NYR_SourceCentral™@NYRSourceCentrl

#Canucks looking at Huet as possible backup for next season if Luongo is moved #nhl

Collapse

Creasy@The_Creasy

I'm told UFA G Cristobal Huet had a brief conversation with the#Canucks today. Two other teams have shown some interest in the vet goalie.

Kevin Woodley@KevinisInGoal

And yes, #Canucks fans wondering what comes after Luongo trade,Huet had lot of success + liked working with G Coach Rollie Melanson in MTL

Kevin Woodley@KevinisInGoal

@dedicated2YHVH No, just talked to Huet today + was looking at him as a fit as a veteran backup, something Canucks need if they move Luongo

Thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he still getting 5mil to play in the Swiss leagues from Chicago?

I'd take him but I want Lack as back up or else he might walk...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kind of a gamble to have Lack as the backup already. At least if we plan on finishing at the top of the conference again.

Theodore may be the better option, but if he's unwilling to come to Vancouver, Huet isn't a bad alternative.

He had some good years in montreal with Melanson. Plus if Lack rips it up at the beginning of the season, he can always be waived, or loaned to a European club again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huet gives us a more proven option than Lack.

I mean the 2 of them DO have a combined 68 NHL games...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he still getting 5mil to play in the Swiss leagues from Chicago?

I'd take him but I want Lack as back up or else he might walk...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like we have a LACK of options..

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he still getting 5mil to play in the Swiss leagues from Chicago?

I'd take him but I want Lack as back up or else he might walk...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he asks for too much money, don't sign him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would lack walk? he is still young and seems to be enjoying his time in the AHL. he gets to play more games and knows he would still be set to become CS's eventual backup.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.