Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

?

Discussion

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1823 replies to this topic

#1 Vancouver Canucks 30

Vancouver Canucks 30

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 226 posts
  • Joined: 03-October 10

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:10 PM

*
POPULAR

?

Edited by Vancouver Canucks 30, 16 August 2012 - 01:29 AM.

  • 31

#2 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,524 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:13 PM

*
POPULAR

The friggen Vancouver Giants sell more tickets than the Yotes.... MOVE THE TEAM ALREADY!

.... and Doan will be all ours! :towel:

Edited by CanucksFanMike, 17 July 2012 - 10:14 PM.

  • 8
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#3 The Brahma Bull

The Brahma Bull

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,224 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 08

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:17 PM

MG better get something decent back for Luongo or I'm gonna be pissed.
  • 1


#4 Thunder Bunnies

Thunder Bunnies

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,576 posts
  • Joined: 16-August 10

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:19 PM

Won't be surprised if Luongo trade happens after Doan's decision unless the offers too good to turn down.
  • 2

#5 Grape

Grape

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,337 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 11

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:26 PM

The friggen Vancouver Giants sell more tickets than the Yotes.... MOVE THE TEAM ALREADY!

.... and Doan will be all ours! :towel:


  • 0

mj761l.jpg0007.gif0007.gif0007.gif0007.gif  

Signature Credit to Vintage Canuck!

 

Don't Click!


#6 canucksnihilist

canucksnihilist

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,459 posts
  • Joined: 14-June 11

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:36 PM

Quebec shouldn't get Doan.

But if he wants to go to Quebec, bring on the Semin ???
  • 0

#7 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:37 PM

Not surprising at all. He'll stay in Phoenix. Too bad he won't win a cup.
  • 0

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#8 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,464 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:52 PM

MG better get something decent back for Luongo or I'm gonna be pissed.

And this has what to do with Doan? Were you thinking Gillis would be ok to get crap back for Luongo if we do sign Doan?

It's Phoenix's spot to lose. Despite the recent developments that suggest Phoenix isn't moving at this point, Doan could still decide their future is uncertain enough he'd like to move on. It's nothing we should hang our hat on but he'd be an excellent pickup if we could get him without handcuffing ourselves.
  • 0

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#9 Pistachios

Pistachios

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,858 posts
  • Joined: 26-April 12

Posted 17 July 2012 - 11:12 PM


  • 0

G4fSut.gif


#10 bloodycanuckleheads

bloodycanuckleheads

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 08

Posted 17 July 2012 - 11:42 PM

*
POPULAR

MG better get something decent back for Luongo or I'm gonna be pissed.


Ha! We're not getting
anything decent for Lu... The best we could possibly hope for is albatross for albatross (Luongo for Nash). Other than that, we're getting hosed...

And, not just for one or two reasons, we're getting hosed for just soooooo many:

1. Lu's been a prima donna since day one (remember all the hoops he used to make management jump through - well, I shouldn't say 'used to', he's still doing it to this day?).
2. Lu's treated management as bad as management treated Bure. Well, OK, maybe not quite that bad, but not good either. And, who has to make a massive gamble to acquire Lu?... Right, another team's management... They're like elephants, they don't forget.
3. If you were a coach or GM, would you want a player who asked out of a decade-long contract after three games on the bench??? Ever???
4. Lu is reportedly steering the trade towards one or two teams (who have nothing we want).
5. Lu never moved his family here. Despite signing a contract in the 2000's - that ran through the 2010's - and into the 2020's... Would you want a player who cared that much about your city?...
6. Would you want a player (signed for another decade) whose production declined dramatically and almost immediately after he signed that contract?...
7. That contract.
8. Oh, and that contract was clearly designed so Lu could cheat the rules (and not play the last few years, yet still get paid the big bucks). Would you want a player who is OK with cheating?...
9. Luongo made his trade request public - thereby ensuring we don't get fair value. Again, would you want a player who did that to his last team on your team???
10. And, it's worth repeating... This isn't a long, drawn out thing or something that's been brewing forever. Lu is pissed that A BETTER PLAYER got to start THREE GAMES ahead of him. Three. Freaking. Games. And, he can't stand playing on this team anymore... Would you want a player like that on your team???

And, remember...

If you pick this player up - you are on the hook for like fifty million dollars - AND - you have to give up one or more decent players in exchange...

Oh yeah, and is this player famous for being a choker?...
  • 8
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:41 PM by BloodyCanuckleheads

I could definitely see Grabner going. He seems to have done his best to play his way out the door (and Gillis seems to be the smartest GM we've ever had, so, put two and two together)...

#11 oldnews

oldnews

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,021 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 17 July 2012 - 11:51 PM

If not the Canucks, best that he stays in Arizona (or goes back to the Peg).
  • 0

#12 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,575 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:19 AM

I say we make a move on someone else now while other teams wait out for Doan.
It really looks like he is going back to Phoenix.
  • 0
Posted Image

#13 Jai604

Jai604

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,033 posts
  • Joined: 14-October 10

Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:27 AM

Won't be surprised if Luongo trade happens after Doan's decision unless the offers too good to turn down.


I agree. I honestly think that Gillis is waiting to re-evaluate the team's needs once Doan makes a decision.
  • 0

RIP LB RR PD


#14 Azzy Mahmood

Azzy Mahmood

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,174 posts
  • Joined: 10-July 11

Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:52 AM

Unsurprising news is unsurprising.

I like Doan. I'd love him on our team. But I'd rather he signed today, with anyone, than keep hearing about him. I can't stand the wait.
  • 0

#15 CanucksLuongoFTW

CanucksLuongoFTW

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 11

Posted 18 July 2012 - 04:52 AM

*
POPULAR

Ha! We're not getting
anything decent for Lu... The best we could possibly hope for is albatross for albatross (Luongo for Nash). Other than that, we're getting hosed...

And, not just for one or two reasons, we're getting hosed for just soooooo many:

1. Lu's been a prima donna since day one (remember all the hoops he used to make management jump through - well, I shouldn't say 'used to', he's still doing it to this day?).
2. Lu's treated management as bad as management treated Bure. Well, OK, maybe not quite that bad, but not good either. And, who has to make a massive gamble to acquire Lu?... Right, another team's management... They're like elephants, they don't forget.
3. If you were a coach or GM, would you want a player who asked out of a decade-long contract after three games on the bench??? Ever???
4. Lu is reportedly steering the trade towards one or two teams (who have nothing we want).
5. Lu never moved his family here. Despite signing a contract in the 2000's - that ran through the 2010's - and into the 2020's... Would you want a player who cared that much about your city?...
6. Would you want a player (signed for another decade) whose production declined dramatically and almost immediately after he signed that contract?...
7. That contract.
8. Oh, and that contract was clearly designed so Lu could cheat the rules (and not play the last few years, yet still get paid the big bucks). Would you want a player who is OK with cheating?...
9. Luongo made his trade request public - thereby ensuring we don't get fair value. Again, would you want a player who did that to his last team on your team???
10. And, it's worth repeating... This isn't a long, drawn out thing or something that's been brewing forever. Lu is pissed that A BETTER PLAYER got to start THREE GAMES ahead of him. Three. Freaking. Games. And, he can't stand playing on this team anymore... Would you want a player like that on your team???

And, remember...

If you pick this player up - you are on the hook for like fifty million dollars - AND - you have to give up one or more decent players in exchange...

Oh yeah, and is this player famous for being a choker?...


1) Example? Luongo has always talked about how he wants to do what's best for the team, and he respected AV's decision to put in Schneider for 3 games.

2) Ur #2 point was already addressed in #1 so I'm assuming u just put it in there to make ur list look bigger.

3) He didn't ask out because of 3 games on the bench. In fact, it's uncertain whether he actually wants to leave or not. He simply said he'd waive his NTC. And the reason he said this is because he wants to do what's best for the team and he realizes that Schneider might be a better fit in Vancouver than he himself.

4) He's not reportedly steering anything. It's Gillis who's been talking with these teams because those teams are reportedly looking for a goalie. The only thing he's steering is that he wouldn't mind returning to Florida because his family lives there.

5) Think about what happens when u move ur family because of your job. When I was a kid my dad moved us from Vancouver to San Jose and i absolutely HATED it. I pretty much had my life set and then i had to get used to a whole new environment. Luongo has kids too. I'm pretty sure he must've talked to his family about everything before deciding that he wouldn't make them move to Vancouver.

6) Explain how his production has dropped "dramatically" in any way. In Luongo's career regular season stats he has only gone 1 year with a save % of under .913. That season was his rookie season with the Islanders. If you think about it, that's consistency at its finest. Don't bother bringing up playoffs. He was fairly inexperienced when he came from the Panthers to the Canucks. Yes he did amazing in his first postseason but there's a such thing called "beginner's luck". Something Steve Mason and Andrew Raycroft proved to have and Schneider could too. The risk with young goaltenders is pretty high. in '09 and '10 the Blackhawks exposed his inexperience with their huge offensive powers. In 2011 Luongo literally carried the team to the finals. Sure he may have almost allowed the Blackhawks to come back, but in Game 7 he was the reason we won the series and kept us alive in OT. In the Boston series, we only scored 8 goals in 7 games. Even if Luongo played at his best in every single game, we were likely to have lost. 2 of our wins that series came from shutouts. Again, all Lu right there. Last year he allowed 7 goals in 2 games. In Game 1 he was the only player that showed up. Game 2 is debatable. But we only score 2 goals both those games. The only game we won was the game we scored 3 goals. So by that logic Schneider didn't do much better to help win.

7) That contract is actually pretty good compared to Parise, Suter, DiPietro, Bryzgalov, Nash, Crosby, Rinne, and many more for the level he is capable of playing at.

8) Not play the last few years and still get the big bucks? Uhh in case u didn't realize, Luongo played 54+ games in all his years with the Canucks. If by "not play" you mean underperform, I already addressed that in #6.

9) Again, it wasn't a trade request. It was a "I'll do it if u ask me to" thing. The only way his trade value lowered is because of the signing of Schneider implying Luongo MUST be traded. That was Gillis's fault.

10) You repeated the same point twice again. You seem desperate to make ur list longer and it's hard for me to take you seriously. But I'm not tired of repeating myself cuz I'm a great guy like that. He was not pissed off because he didn't get to play 3 games. By that logic, he'd be pissed off cuz he didn't get to play 82 games every season. Ur just speculating that the reason he wants to leave is cuz of 3 games

I also don't see why you're trying to make this a Luongo thread when it's clearly titled "[Report] No Shane Doan Decision For a Few More Weeks- Leaning Towards Coyotes".

Edited by SN -Admin, 20 July 2012 - 09:18 AM.
Please don't attack other users.

  • 27
The TO Maple Leafs are:

Losers
Even
After
Forty-Four
Seasons

#16 Rypien37

Rypien37

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,532 posts
  • Joined: 26-March 07

Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:25 AM

This is so ???? stupid...GIllis move on!

Edited by Templeton Peck, 19 July 2012 - 12:09 AM.
censor bypass

  • 0
Posted Image

R.I.P. Your heart and fearlessness will be remembered


#17 Nicklasjensen46

Nicklasjensen46

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 425 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 09

Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:37 AM

the asking price for doan is too much. Love to have him but way to much of a cap hit.
  • 0

My 2012 Canucks
Sedin Sedin Burrows
Higgins Kesler Hodgson
Sturm Malhotra Hansen
Sammuelson Lapiere Oreskovich

Hamhuis Bieska
Edler Salo
Tanev Ballard
Luongo Schnieder


#18 shane1733

shane1733

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 79 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 11

Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:56 AM

Won't be surprised if Luongo trade happens after Doan's decision unless the offers too good to turn down.


Will also happen after the new cba agreement, if thjere is one.
  • 0

#19 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 18 July 2012 - 07:00 AM

When Doan's agent immediately put every team 'on the list' , he was fishing for a better deal from the Yotes. Now that the legal issues seem to have been stalled or put off another year, he is trying to squeeze the best deal possible before the CBA is changed.

Posted Image

I lolled at this. Well done.
  • 2
Posted Image

#20 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,658 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 18 July 2012 - 08:39 AM

Doan re-signing in Phoenix to retire always had a 90% chance of happening.

Good for him on being loyal.
  • 0
Posted Image

#21 bloodycanuckleheads

bloodycanuckleheads

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 08

Posted 18 July 2012 - 09:40 AM

Yeah, you guys are right. The reports that the Canucks wanted Luongo traded before the draft (yet couldn't even come close to getting it done) - mean with 100% certainty that every other GM in the league agrees with me. And not one of them agrees with you guys (or Lu would be gone right now)...

Oh, and to all you guys who think that Lu isn't a prima donna - explain why we had to be the only team in NHL history to make a goalie our captain, just to stroke his ego???

Think about that: We had to make a goalie our captain...

A freaking goalie.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and that made us the laughing-stock of the entire league. No team has ever had to do crap like that for a goalie. Meaning, Lu isn't just a prima donna, he's about the biggest prima donna ever...

Edited by bloodycanuckleheads, 18 July 2012 - 09:43 AM.

  • 0
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:41 PM by BloodyCanuckleheads

I could definitely see Grabner going. He seems to have done his best to play his way out the door (and Gillis seems to be the smartest GM we've ever had, so, put two and two together)...

#22 Gooseberries

Gooseberries

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,386 posts
  • Joined: 09-January 10

Posted 18 July 2012 - 09:45 AM

*
POPULAR

Yeah, you guys are right. The reports that the Canucks wanted Luongo traded before the draft (yet couldn't even come close to getting it done) - mean with 100% certainty that every other GM in the league agrees with me. And not one of them agrees with you guys (or Lu would be gone right now)...

Oh, and to all you guys who think that Lu isn't a prima donna - explain why we had to be the only team in NHL history to make a goalie our captain, just to stroke his ego???

Think about that: We had to make a goalie our captain...

A freaking goalie.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and that made us the laughing-stock of the entire league. No team has ever had to do crap like that for a goalie. Meaning, Lu isn't just a prima donna, he's about the biggest prima donna ever...

wow bud. check your sources. there have been multiple goalie captains. you literally know nothing.
  • 8

20u7nh3.jpg

Credit to Vintage Canuck

The Sig lord


#23 bloodycanuckleheads

bloodycanuckleheads

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 08

Posted 18 July 2012 - 09:47 AM

I'm talking about the modern NHL.

Luongo's the only goalie captain since the 1940's...

EDIT: Oh, and I said we were the only team that ever had to do it to stroke the player's ego. That's 100% true. Even if you go back a thousand years...

Edited by bloodycanuckleheads, 18 July 2012 - 09:50 AM.

  • 0
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:41 PM by BloodyCanuckleheads

I could definitely see Grabner going. He seems to have done his best to play his way out the door (and Gillis seems to be the smartest GM we've ever had, so, put two and two together)...

#24 bloodycanuckleheads

bloodycanuckleheads

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 08

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:01 AM

From wikipedia:

In order to account for the league rule, Luongo did not perform any of the on-ice duties reserved for captains and did not wear the captain's "C" on his jersey.


So, tell me, what was the point of making Luongo captain, if not to stroke his ego??? We had to name him captain - yet he didn't have to actually captain anything...

Oh right, at the time, he was dragging his feet about re-signing here...

You guys sure have a short attention-span around here.
  • 0
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:41 PM by BloodyCanuckleheads

I could definitely see Grabner going. He seems to have done his best to play his way out the door (and Gillis seems to be the smartest GM we've ever had, so, put two and two together)...

#25 VintageForever420

VintageForever420

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 933 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 08

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:16 AM

Seriously frack Shane Doan. This is getting out of hand I'm not sayin he won't sign here but make up your ???? mind already.
  • 0

#26 Aladeen

Aladeen

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,311 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 07

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:23 AM

1) Example? Luongo has always talked about how he wants to do what's best for the team, and he respected AV's decision to put in Schneider for 3 games.

2) Ur #2 point was already addressed in #1 so I'm assuming u just put it in there to make ur list look bigger.

3) He didn't ask out because of 3 games on the bench. In fact, it's uncertain whether he actually wants to leave or not. He simply said he'd waive his NTC. And the reason he said this is because he wants to do what's best for the team and he realizes that Schneider might be a better fit in Vancouver than he himself.

4) He's not reportedly steering anything. It's Gillis who's been talking with these teams because those teams are reportedly looking for a goalie. The only thing he's steering is that he wouldn't mind returning to Florida because his family lives there.

5) Think about what happens when u move ur family because of your job. When I was a kid my dad moved us from Vancouver to San Jose and i absolutely HATED it. I pretty much had my life set and then i had to get used to a whole new environment. Luongo has kids too. I'm pretty sure he must've talked to his family about everything before deciding that he wouldn't make them move to Vancouver.

6) Explain how his production has dropped "dramatically" in any way. In Luongo's career regular season stats he has only gone 1 year with a save % of under .913. That season was his rookie season with the Islanders. If you think about it, that's consistency at its finest. Don't bother bringing up playoffs. He was fairly inexperienced when he came from the Panthers to the Canucks. Yes he did amazing in his first postseason but there's a such thing called "beginner's luck". Something Steve Mason and Andrew Raycroft proved to have and Schneider could too. The risk with young goaltenders is pretty high. in '09 and '10 the Blackhawks exposed his inexperience with their huge offensive powers. In 2011 Luongo literally carried the team to the finals. Sure he may have almost allowed the Blackhawks to come back, but in Game 7 he was the reason we won the series and kept us alive in OT. In the Boston series, we only scored 8 goals in 7 games. Even if Luongo played at his best in every single game, we were likely to have lost. 2 of our wins that series came from shutouts. Again, all Lu right there. Last year he allowed 7 goals in 2 games. In Game 1 he was the only player that showed up. Game 2 is debatable. But we only score 2 goals both those games. The only game we won was the game we scored 3 goals. So by that logic Schneider didn't do much better to help win.

7) That contract is actually pretty good compared to Parise, Suter, DiPietro, Bryzgalov, Nash, Crosby, Rinne, and many more for the level he is capable of playing at.

8) Not play the last few years and still get the big bucks? Uhh in case u didn't realize, Luongo played 54+ games in all his years with the Canucks. If by "not play" you mean underperform, I already addressed that in #6.

9) Again, it wasn't a trade request. It was a "I'll do it if u ask me to" thing. The only way his trade value lowered is because of the signing of Schneider implying Luongo MUST be traded. That was Gillis's fault.

10) You repeated the same point twice again. You seem desperate to make ur list longer and it's hard for me to take you seriously. But I'm not tired of repeating myself cuz I'm a great guy like that. He was not pissed off because he didn't get to play 3 games. By that logic, he'd be pissed off cuz he didn't get to play 82 games every season. Ur just speculating that the reason he wants to leave is cuz of 3 games, when in fact, if he DOES want to leave at all, it's cuz of the idiot "fans" like you.

I also don't see why you're trying to make this a Luongo thread when it's clearly titled "[Report] No Shane Doan Decision For a Few More Weeks- Leaning Towards Coyotes".

+1 Luo is a fantastic goalie and he will bring a great return. Its all bargaining. No team is gonna say "oh what a happy coincidence, we desperately need a franchise goalie and you desperately need to move a franchise goalie." Burke and any other GM interested in Luongo is playing the media to give the Canucks a weaker bargaining position. That is all.
  • 1
Posted Image

#27 bloodycanuckleheads

bloodycanuckleheads

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 08

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:31 AM

Oh, just to point out... You can always tell who is right in an argument - by looking for the personal attacks. The side that has to resort to personal attacks is virtually always wrong.

I haven't personally-attacked anyone.

Several of you guys have personally-attacked me.

And, I should probably dismantle this load of twaddle (that you guys all seem to agree with):

1) Example? Luongo has always talked about how he wants to do what's best for the team, and he respected AV's decision to put in Schneider for 3 games.


Example???? There's literally dozens... Let's see... The way he treated us when he was traded here. The way he set deadlines before training camp to force the massive contract. The captain thing. The way he forced us to play him 70 games a year, even though we didn't want to. Etc... Oh yeah, and he told the world he wanted out of Vancouver (guaranteeing we don't get anything good for him in return).

2) Ur #2 point was already addressed in #1 so I'm assuming u just put it in there to make ur list look bigger.


There's a difference between a player being a prima donna - and a prima donna who treats management badly. You might want to have the first type of player on your team (if they're good enough) - you almost always don't want the latter. Big difference.

3) He didn't ask out because of 3 games on the bench. In fact, it's uncertain whether he actually wants to leave or not. He simply said he'd waive his NTC. And the reason he said this is because he wants to do what's best for the team and he realizes that Schneider might be a better fit in Vancouver than he himself.


Immediately after we were put out of the playoffs - he goes on television and says he'd waive his NTC. Now, you may not realize that that's a trade request - but every GM in the league did!

4) He's not reportedly steering anything. It's Gillis who's been talking with these teams because those teams are reportedly looking for a goalie. The only thing he's steering is that he wouldn't mind returning to Florida because his family lives there.


Ha! So, you say 'he's not... steering anything' - then follow that with 'the only thing he's steering'!

5) Think about what happens when u move ur family because of your job. When I was a kid my dad moved us from Vancouver to San Jose and i absolutely HATED it. I pretty much had my life set and then i had to get used to a whole new environment. Luongo has kids too. I'm pretty sure he must've talked to his family about everything before deciding that he wouldn't make them move to Vancouver.


  • 1
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:41 PM by BloodyCanuckleheads

I could definitely see Grabner going. He seems to have done his best to play his way out the door (and Gillis seems to be the smartest GM we've ever had, so, put two and two together)...

#28 bloodycanuckleheads

bloodycanuckleheads

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 08

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:31 AM

Well, before I was 5, I moved from Vancouver to Hong Kong (Cantonese/Mandarin) to Vancouver to Calgary (french immersion) to Vancouver. And, I would never have stayed away from my family.


6) Explain how his production has dropped "dramatically" in any way. In Luongo's career regular season stats he has only gone 1 year with a save % of under .913. That season was his rookie season with the Islanders. If you think about it, that's consistency at its finest. Don't bother bringing up playoffs. He was fairly inexperienced when he came from the Panthers to the Canucks. Yes he did amazing in his first postseason but there's a such thing called "beginner's luck". Something Steve Mason and Andrew Raycroft proved to have and Schneider could too. The risk with young goaltenders is pretty high. in '09 and '10 the Blackhawks exposed his inexperience with their huge offensive powers. In 2011 Luongo literally carried the team to the finals. Sure he may have almost allowed the Blackhawks to come back, but in Game 7 he was the reason we won the series and kept us alive in OT. In the Boston series, we only scored 8 goals in 7 games. Even if Luongo played at his best in every single game, we were likely to have lost. 2 of our wins that series came from shutouts. Again, all Lu right there. Last year he allowed 7 goals in 2 games. In Game 1 he was the only player that showed up. Game 2 is debatable. But we only score 2 goals both those games. The only game we won was the game we scored 3 goals. So by that logic Schneider didn't do much better to help win.


Yeah, Luongo's performance didn't drop. I mean, he was only a top 3 goalie in the league when he signed his contract - and now, a couple years later, he's barely in the top 20 and we can't even trade him! Think about that, we have someone who is supposed to be one of the best goalies in the history of the sport - and no one wants him!

Explain how that's possible if what you say is true!


7) That contract is actually pretty good compared to Parise, Suter, DiPietro, Bryzgalov, Nash, Crosby, Rinne, and many more for the level he is capable of playing at.


Again, if what you are saying is true, how come no one wants him??? And, I like how you cherry-picked the worst contracts in history!

His contract's actually pretty bad compared to Alex Burrows, etc...


8) Not play the last few years and still get the big bucks? Uhh in case u didn't realize, Luongo played 54+ games in all his years with the Canucks. If by "not play" you mean underperform, I already addressed that in #6.


I'm talking about the 2020-2021 season here. What on Earth do you think I'm talking about??? What does Luongo playing 54 games the last few years have to do with how many games he plays 8 seasons from now???

Luongo signed a contract that's obviously meant for him to retire early from. That contract is front loaded. So, in all the years he will actually play, he'll get paid more than he should. Then, he's going to quit three years early, having already pocketed the money he should be getting paid for those seasons. The contract is as crooked as it gets...

9) Again, it wasn't a trade request. It was a "I'll do it if u ask me to" thing. The only way his trade value lowered is because of the signing of Schneider implying Luongo MUST be traded. That was Gillis's fault.


Liar. You're playing with semantics here. Yes, Lu didn't actually say 'I want a trade'. He publicly said he'd waive his NTC - WHICH IS, FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, THE SAME THING!

I can't believe so many people here don't understand that.

When a player says he wants off your team - that's a freaking trade request no matter how he phrases it!

10) You repeated the same point twice again. You seem desperate to make ur list longer and it's hard for me to take you seriously. But I'm not tired of repeating myself cuz I'm a great guy like that. He was not pissed off because he didn't get to play 3 games. By that logic, he'd be pissed off cuz he didn't get to play 82 games every season. Ur just speculating that the reason he wants to leave is cuz of 3 games, when in fact, if he DOES want to leave at all, it's cuz of the idiot "fans" like you.


Really? I say: 'It bears repeating...' and you slam me for repeating myself! Well, I freaking said I was repeating myself - and I had good reason to. How ludicrous...


I also don't see why you're trying to make this a Luongo thread when it's clearly titled "[Report] No Shane Doan Decision For a Few More Weeks- Leaning Towards Coyotes".


And, of course, you missed the fact that my first post was a response to someone else's post about Luongo.

So, there you have it. Not even a single valid point in there. Not surprising so many people here agree with it...
  • 2
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:41 PM by BloodyCanuckleheads

I could definitely see Grabner going. He seems to have done his best to play his way out the door (and Gillis seems to be the smartest GM we've ever had, so, put two and two together)...

#29 arsenalian

arsenalian

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,342 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 06

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:45 AM

Yeah, you guys are right. The reports that the Canucks wanted Luongo traded before the draft (yet couldn't even come close to getting it done) - mean with 100% certainty that every other GM in the league agrees with me. And not one of them agrees with you guys (or Lu would be gone right now)...

Oh, and to all you guys who think that Lu isn't a prima donna - explain why we had to be the only team in NHL history to make a goalie our captain, just to stroke his ego???

Think about that: We had to make a goalie our captain...

A freaking goalie.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and that made us the laughing-stock of the entire league. No team has ever had to do crap like that for a goalie. Meaning, Lu isn't just a prima donna, he's about the biggest prima donna ever...


Why don't you take your ramblings over to a Luongo thread?
  • 4

#30 Gooseberries

Gooseberries

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,386 posts
  • Joined: 09-January 10

Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:58 AM

Why don't you take your ramblings over to a Luongo thread?

no no no I like that thread... keep him here!
  • 2

20u7nh3.jpg

Credit to Vintage Canuck

The Sig lord






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.