key2thecup Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 What's with this hype on foil.. Everyone know's Xenu can project his thoughts through the foil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 What's with this hype on foil.. Everyone know's Xenu can project his thoughts through the foil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
key2thecup Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Wait so when a judge convicts someone of conspiring or conspiracy..... does that judge have to wear the tin hat or no? real question for the hat experts.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Wait so when a judge convicts someone of conspiring or conspiracy..... does that judge have to wear the tin hat or no? real question for the hat experts.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
key2thecup Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Why must you go and ruin their blissful utopia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 You should probably take certain measures prior to posting something like this...like say for example ridding yourself of inanity and ineptitude, and acquainting yourself with reality. Yourself, Special Ed, Bertuzzi Babe, Zaibatsu and a couple of others etc. should seriously attend a workshop or something... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 You should just stick to the topic and not worry about if i'm one-sided or not. You don't have to take the thread on a tangent in order to check on the 'sidedness' of my opinions.......my opinions being one-sided or not, is not the topic of this particular thread and therefore not relevant, either to the thread, nor are they your duty to check on. You could simply have asked me, if my opinion matter so much to you.....yet again, instead of litigating the topic of another thread, ie Israel and Palestine, in this non-Israel-Palestine thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxi Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 what's with CDC users and the word "inane"? guys, intelligent people don't actually speak like that in the real world you ain't foolin no one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buggernut Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 1) Why would Israel want to go to war with Iran? You do realize that would result in every Israeli city being pounded with missiles. What would Israel possibly stand to gain from that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 lolz. Feel free to screw your head back on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satan's Evil Twin Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 This is a terrible tragedy. Killing innocent people is just wrong. So very very wrong. That said, this thread was never posted with the aim of discussing the tragedy. The article isn't about the bombing but about what Netanyahu said, and starting another argument over Iran and Israel on a completely unproven premise. Then the OP throws his hands up and cries out "We can spam incidents since the dawn of time it doesn't justify this attack. And people like you are trying to derail the thread because it doesn't 'fit with your views'" when someone brings up things that don't "fit within (his) views". As to what I'd have posted had I been around, well I wouldn't have posted what you did, that's for sure. In fact I wouldn't bother posting a story about a bus blowing up whether it was full of Palestinian or Israeli tourists. Now if it had evidence pointing to Iran, you bet your ass I would post it. That would be pretty ???? big and surely would be posted by someone who takes part in these topics. Meh, I came into this thread because I thought it was actually about the event. A misleading title if I ever saw one. Try being a little less transparent next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
key2thecup Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 This is a terrible tragedy. Killing innocent people is just wrong. So very very wrong. That said, this thread was never posted with the aim of discussing the tragedy. The article isn't about the bombing but about what Netanyahu said, and starting another argument over Iran and Israel on a completely unproven premise. Then the OP throws his hands up and cries out "We can spam incidents since the dawn of time it doesn't justify this attack. And people like you are trying to derail the thread because it doesn't 'fit with your views'" when someone brings up things that don't "fit within (his) views". As to what I'd have posted had I been around, well I wouldn't have posted what you did, that's for sure. In fact I wouldn't bother posting a story about a bus blowing up whether it was full of Palestinian or Israeli tourists. Now if it had evidence pointing to Iran, you bet your ass I would post it. That would be pretty ???? big and surely would be posted by someone who takes part in these topics. Meh, I came into this thread because I thought it was actually about the event. A misleading title if I ever saw one. Try being a little less transparent next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 And to think I was going to simply reply to his post with 'Here we go again' and move on... I wonder, if I was to quote the statement 'by deception thou shalt wage war', who would have a clue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Except that the correct translation of "be-tachbūlōt ta`aseh lekhā milchāmāh " and the Hebrew "בתחבולות תעשה לך מלחמה" is actually "For by wise counsel thou shalt wage thy war". That is the old motto of Mossad. The bolded one, that is .......not the version so often mistakenly quoted as the motto by those who may have another agenda. The new one is: "be-'éyn tachbūlōt yippol `ām; ū-teshū`āh be-rov yō'éts" and in Hebrew: " באין תחבולות יפול עם, ותשועה ברוב יועץ" Translation: "Where no counsel is, the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." (Proverbs XI, 14). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 That was an extremely compelling and irrefutable rebuttal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Ed Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 Will be interesting to see what the investigation yields. And the consequences, if any. Already it's reported to be a suicide bomber. I'm going to get some sleep and check for updates tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthNinja Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Well those who actually speak the language and Linguistics scholars disagree. And I'll trust those who speak the language and those who are well educated in Linguistics over Google translator any day of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.