-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 @DFriedmanWFAN Still get the sense that #Isles and #Canucks could strike a Luongo deal by the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyville88 Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 Friendly reminder that this thread is for news only. Yours posts should contain Luongo-related NEWS Discussion goes here: Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everybody Hates Raymond Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 Bobby Mac: One way or another Luongo won't be a Vancouver Canuck a week from now #shocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Bettman Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 @Eklund 10m Flyers are NOT trading for Luongo at this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Bryz bought out, Lu to Flyers but not by trade? Whatever that means. http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/Philly-Buys-Out-Bryzgalov-E5-Luongo-to-Flyers-E4/1/52312 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 @sportsnetmurph: #canucks GM Mike Gillis would not say if he plans on using a compliance buyout. Remains optimistic he can still trade Luongo. @sportsnetmurph: Can't see Philly going after Luongo. They just got killed by a long term deal and are probably a little shy of acquiring another. #Canucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 @BrettCyrgalis League source says #Isles not one of the teams inquiring about Luongo. That certainly doesn't mean they won't try to upgrade in net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=52318 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 “@seangentille: STAIND RT @ThomasDrance http://canucksarmy.com/2013/6/26/strombabble-salary-cap-surgery Your complete guide to Luongo's continued immovability. #Canucks” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 @drosennhl: I asked Mike Gillis about Luongo and where the organization stands now with him, but he gave me a no comment complete with a smile. @SNHockeyCentral: Gillis: Canucks shopping Luongo before draft - Sportsnet.ca http://t.co/TyW6JlK9eH @hockeynight: Crucial days ahead for Canucks GM Mike Gillis in pursuit of Roberto Luongo trade; buyout may not be palatable option: http://t.co/59LqOGwIU0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=426460 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Bobby Mac on team 1040 today: Link (about half way through) Highlight re: Lu- - Thinks Lu gets claimed if he's waived. - Thinks NYI still have some level of interest in Lu - Doesn't think Philly is interested in Lu or Miller (too big cap hit). Phily looking for lower cost options (lol) - Says Edm called about Lu at some point. But due to the NTC, nothing came of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IIlIlIIllIlIIIlIl Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 While negotiations with Evgeni Nabokov have reportedly come to a standstill, the New York Islanders are entertaining other goaltending options for next season and beyond. However, Roberto Luongo no longer appears to be a potential target. As relayed by the New York Post, a league source said the Islanders are not in the mix for the Vancouver Canucks netminder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Vancouver will probably be very reluctant to buy him out because they feel he has some value in the trade market and they would like to restock their cupboard with picks and prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 http://sports.nationalpost.com/2013/06/27/canucks-will-try-to-trade-roberto-luongo-heading-into-nhl-draft/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 @StapeNewsday 1m As per @RealKyper report, #Isles indeed interested in Luongo-DP swap. Only that deal though, so VAN may look elsewhere for asset in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Flyers Cap Space and Luongo As soon as the Flyers file compliance buyout paperwork today to eliminate the contracts of Danny Briere and Ilya Bryzgalov from their salary cap figure, the club can officially announce the signing of Mark Streit. At that point, the team will have $4,181,478 of open cap space. This does not include the team's ability to use an in-season long-term injured reserve allowance for Chris Pronger ($4,941,429). The team is still going to trade a defenseman both to alleviate the logjam on the roster and to free some additional cap space. The most likely candidate to get traded is Andrej Meszaros ($4 million cap hit, unrestricted free agent in 2014). Braydon Coburn ($4.5 million cap hit, partial no-trade clause) is a second possibility but only if the team heavily pursues an upgrade on the current top three on the blueline. Kimmo Timonen ($6 million cap hit) is likely to retire after the 2013-14 season. As of now, cap space will NOT be a problem for the Flyers either in 2013-14 or in terms of extending the contracts of potential free agents before the 2014-15 season. Of course, that could change rapidly depending on the roster moves the team makes in the days and weeks to come. With the Bryzgalov buyout, goaltending is one of the first issues the team is going to have to figure out for next season. While it is possible that former Calder Trophy winner Steve Mason could play to a similar level to the one he displayed in a brief late-season trial following his acquistion from Columbus, relying on Mason and either a discount veteran backup goaltender or another unproven starter would be an extremely risky strategy. It seems more likely that the Flyers will either go for a split-time starting arrangement by signing someone such as impending unrestricted free agent Ray Emery or opt for a proven full-time starter candidate such as Roberto Luongo. Vancouver Canucks general manager Mike Gillis is still clinging to hope that he will be able to trade Luongo in order to avoid burning up a compliance buyout that would keep the goalie on the payroll (but not the salary cap) for the next 18 years. Good luck with that. Luongo would represent a goaltending upgrade for many teams in the NHL, including the Flyers. However, no team in the NHL wants to take on the 34-year-old's current contract, which carries a $5.33 cap hit and runs through the end of the 2021-22 season. In addition, there is no benefit to Luongo to formally waive his full no-trade clause at this point. As a free agent, he will more than make up the one-third difference between the buyout payments and his full current salary. If and when Luongo hits the unrestricted free agent market, the Flyers are a candidate to pursue his services. At yesterday's Bryzgalov press conference in Voorhees, Flyers general manager Paul Holmgren said that Luongo is not an option. What that really meant is that the Flyers aren't about to trade for him. As a free agent, Luongo would immediately become an attractive option. The team will have the cap space to pursue Luongo and, in conjunction with at least one more cap-space clearing move, still be able to address other areas of the roster. However, the Flyers don't want to put themselves in the same situation they did with Bryzgalov. Luongo is probably going to pull in something north of the deal Niklas Bäckström recently signed to re-up with the Wild (three years, $3.4 million cap hit). It could take a three-year or even a four-year deal in the neighborhood of a $4 million cap hit to sign Luongo, because the Flyers would not be the only interested team. As an alternative, the Flyers could sit tight and simply wait until Luongo signs elsewhere and the goalie marketplace increasingly becomes a buyer's market. There are only a few clubs actively looking for goalies. If the Flyers go for the split-time option with Mason, veterans such as Emery or Evgeni Nabokov could be candidates. The likes of Jose Theodore or Dan Ellis would be one-year backup possibilities if the Flyers are going to roll the dice with Mason as their starter. If Tim Thomas elects to return to the NHL, he'd be another possibility. The Islanders would have the option of tolling his contract or setting him loose as an unrestricted free agent. http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=52318#.Uc3WhPnVBBA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 @DFriedmanWFAN 5m Negotiations between #Isles and #Canucks are ongoing. VAN has express they will not do a straight-up swap but they have very few suitors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 @DFriedmanWFAN 4m Source: "Highly-unlikely" the NHL would allow a straight-up DiPietro for Luongo swap. Move would circumvent the CBA. @DFriedmanWFAN 3m Would be shocked if #Isles didn't make a counter-offer for Luongo. Not willing to go very high though, and they shouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 @Hope_Smoke: Mckenzie on TSN Radio "if Luongo isn't traded he'll be placed on waivers and I suspect he'll get picked up on waivers maybe by Edmonton" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.