• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Templeton Peck

[Discussion] Roberto Luongo Trade Thread (Keep all discussion here)

Recommended Posts

i dont know how to quote your quote, elvis, but that is an outstanding story about the hell chemistry question... that guy should quit his chemistry deal and get a job writing for the daily show with jon stewart. he's got the perfect mind for it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But look, the thread is no longer bickering back and forth but rather a lot more fun. Now once we get some Luongo news we can get back on topic rather than poetry and jokes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people don't remember, but Schneider and Luongo were probably the best canucks for a lot of last season. When the offense died down after the midway point, Luongo and Schneider won us a lot of games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people don't remember, but Schneider and Luongo were probably the best canucks for a lot of last season. When the offense died down after the midway point, Luongo and Schneider won us a lot of games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory could Edler Raymond and Luongo be packaged to a team to achieve a greater return than just luongo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4

For example doesn't this look appealing?

To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin

To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4

For example doesn't this look appealing?

To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin

To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? That fills a lot of our holes???

That or if he ends up in Florida ( although I don't think tallon is interested ) is

Van: Edler, lui and Raymond

Fla: gudbranson, Matthias and bjugstad and a pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's freaking disgusting. Slap yourself and hang yourself afterwards you were clearly inbred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4

For example doesn't this look appealing?

To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin

To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take Seabrook off Chicago and they become too small; one of our recent D problems.

Seabrook will not be traded by Chicago unless they recover another big D. Exactly why we need someone like him back if we give up Edler. I like that you are attending to our needs; but the deal will not go down for that reason!

Take out Edler, Gunnarsson and Franson and Luongo could probably get that on his own. I think this would be more appealing

To Vancouver: Johan Franzen + 2013 1st

To Detroit: Alex Edler + Keith Ballard

Edler gives Detroit that 'Lidstrom replacement', and Ballard solidifys their D core

Edler - Kronwall

Ballard - Ericsson

Quincey - Smith

then

To Vancouver: Brent Seabrook

To Chicago: Roberto Luongo + Mason Raymond + 2013 2nd

Sedin - Sedin - Franzen (this would be an epic line in the playoffs)

Burrows - Kesler - Booth

Higgins - Lapierre - Kassian

Volpatti - Malhotra - Hansen

Hamhuis - Seabrook

Bieksa - Garrison

Connauton - Tanev

Schneider

Lack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Franzen is interesting, although he has a lifetime contract as well - 8 more years at 4 million cap hit. (expires when he is 40, salary starts dipping at 37/8)... Wouldn't give up Edler for him though, and wouldn't want to see Edler in Detroit. Let the hole in the blueline remain, or fill it with a Leaf.

To Van - Franzen

To Toronto - Luongo

To Detroit - too bad the Leafs blueline is so pathetic...can't see Holland finding what he wants there. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4

For example doesn't this look appealing?

To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin

To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? That fills a lot of our holes???

That or if he ends up in Florida ( although I don't think tallon is interested ) is

Van: Edler, lui and Raymond

Fla: gudbranson, Matthias and bjugstad and a pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Dasein

Never trade Edler??? Should of said that about Hodgson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tweets from Botch today:

@taj1944 @samjam99 thanks for clarifying, and for the record I have TO, chi and a mystery team who arrived late to the party

@botchford who is this mystery team? San Jose? Anahiem? Edmonton? Am I close?

@CanuckleSmith can't say I'm 100% sure but one of those would be a good guess

Says right now, TO/Chi/Mystery are the teams involved. Wonder who mystery team is?

Other read: http://www.bergerbytes.ca/2012/09/burke-not-content-with-leafs/

TORONTO (Sep. 20) – For Brian Burke, the summer of 2012 has been all about tempering expectation. The Maple Leafs’ general manager made a couple of modest additions and suggested – rather strongly – that no further altering will be done.

That isn’t so, according to an Eastern Conference rival.

“From my standpoint, Brian is poised to make at least one prime acquisition… possibly two,” said the fellow executive. “I think – like many of us – he is waiting to see the lay of the land once a new Collective Bargaining Agreement is in place. He’s been very involved in trying to improve his goaltending and I can tell you that he’s determined to add a big player up front. I’ll be quite surprised, as will many of my colleagues, if he goes into the next hockey season without a significant upgrade.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.