Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

NY Times admits the obvious - Government censors media


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 dank.

dank.

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,854 posts
  • Joined: 04-February 06

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:48 PM

http://www.nytimes.c...&pagewanted=all

Latest Word on the Trail? I Take It Back


By JEREMY W. PETERS

Published: July 15, 2012


The quotations come back redacted, stripped of colorful metaphors, colloquial language and anything even mildly provocative.

They are sent by e-mail from the Obama headquarters in Chicago to reporters who have interviewed campaign officials under one major condition: the press office has veto power over what statements can be quoted and attributed by name.

Most reporters, desperate to pick the brains of the president’s top strategists, grudgingly agree. After the interviews, they review their notes, check their tape recorders and send in the juiciest sound bites for review.
The verdict from the campaign — an operation that prides itself on staying consistently on script — is often no, Barack Obama does not approve this message.

The push and pull over what is on the record is one of journalism’s perennial battles. But those negotiations typically took place case by case, free from the red pens of press minders. Now, with a millisecond Twitter news cycle and an unforgiving, gaffe-obsessed media culture, politicians and their advisers are routinely demanding that reporters allow them final editing power over any published quotations.

Quote approval is standard practice for the Obama campaign, used by many top strategists and almost all midlevel aides in Chicago and at the White House — almost anyone other than spokesmen who are paid to be quoted. (And sometimes it applies even to them.) It is also commonplace throughout Washington and on the campaign trail.

The Romney campaign insists that journalists interviewing any of Mitt Romney’s five sons agree to use only quotations that are approved by the press office. And Romney advisers almost always require that reporters ask them for the green light on anything from a conversation that they would like to include in an article.
From Capitol Hill to the Treasury Department, interviews granted only with quote approval have become the default position. Those officials who dare to speak out of school, but fearful of making the slightest off-message remark, shroud even the most innocuous and anodyne quotations in anonymity by insisting they be referred to as a “top Democrat” or a “Republican strategist.”

It is a double-edged sword for journalists, who are getting the on-the-record quotes they have long asked for, but losing much of the spontaneity and authenticity in their interviews.

Jim Messina, the Obama campaign manager, can be foul-mouthed. But readers would not know it because he deletes the curse words before approving his quotes. Brevity is not a strong suit of David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser. So he tightens up his sentences before giving them the O.K.

Stuart Stevens, the senior Romney strategist, is fond of disparaging political opponents by quoting authors like Walt Whitman and referring to historical figures like H. R. Haldeman, Richard Nixon’s chief of staff. But such clever lines later rarely make it past Mr. Stevens.

Many journalists spoke about the editing only if granted anonymity, an irony that did not escape them. No one said the editing altered the meaning of a quote. The changes were almost always small and seemingly unnecessary, they said.

Those who did speak on the record said the restrictions seem only to be growing. “It’s not something I’m particularly proud of because there’s a part of me that says, ‘Don’t do it, don’t agree to their terms,’ ” said Major Garrett, a correspondent for The National Journal. “There are times when this feels like I’m dealing with some of my editors. It’s like, ‘You just changed this because you could!’ ”

It was difficult to find a news outlet that had not agreed to quote approval, albeit reluctantly. Organizations like Bloomberg, The Washington Post, Vanity Fair, Reuters and The New York Times have all consented to interviews under such terms.

“We don’t like the practice,” said Dean Baquet, managing editor for news at The New York Times. “We encourage our reporters to push back. Unfortunately this practice is becoming increasingly common, and maybe we have to push back harder.”

The Obama campaign declined to make Mr. Plouffe or Mr. Messina available to explain their media practices. “We are not putting anyone on the record for this story,” said Katie Hogan, an Obama spokeswoman, without a hint of irony. She pointed to the many unrestricted interviews with campaign officials every day on television and when the press corps travels with the president.

Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said the White House has made a concerted effort to make more officials available to the news media. “We have a lot more people talking a lot more often now,” he said.
Both presidential campaigns are keenly aware of what can happen when they speak too freely. Damaging sound bites can live on in the news cycle for days. Mr. Obama’s remark last month during a televised news conference that “the private sector is doing fine” landed almost immediately in attack ads. And Eric Fehrnstrom’s “Etch A Sketch” comment on CNN, about softening some of the harder positions Mr. Romney took during the primaries, continues to haunt the Romney campaign five months later.

Reporters who have covered the Obama presidency say the quote-approval process fits a pattern by this White House of finding new ways to limit its exposure in the news media.

“We realize there’s a caution and a wariness about stray comments driving the news cycle,” said Caren Bohan of Reuters, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association. “The argument we make is that if a president or a candidate is out there more, I think these things are less likely to be as glaring.”
Modern White Houses have long had “background briefings,” gatherings of top officials who speak to reporters under the condition that they are quoted anonymously. With time, the restrictions have become broader, often bordering on the absurd.

In 2007, Vice President Dick Cheney outed himself in a briefing the White House intended to be anonymous during an overseas trip. “I’ve seen some press reporting says, ‘Cheney went in to beat up on them,’ ” the vice president told reporters, according to the official transcript, adding, “That’s not the way I work.”
Though reporters with him protested, the vice president’s office refused to allow them to identify Mr. Cheney by name — even though it was clear who was speaking.

Under President Obama, the insistence on blanket anonymity has grown to new levels.

The White House’s latest innovation is a variation of the background briefing called the “deep-background briefing,” which it holds for groups of reporters, sometimes several dozen at a time. Reporters may paraphrase what senior administration officials say, but they are forbidden to put anything in quotation marks or identify the speakers.

The White House held such a briefing after the Supreme Court’s health care ruling last month with officials including Mr. Plouffe, Mr. Carney and Dan Pfeiffer, the communications director. But when reporters asked to quote part of the conversation, even anonymously, they were told no. Even the spokesmen were off limits.


Edited by dank., 23 July 2012 - 10:49 PM.

  • 1

Posted Image


#2 theminister

theminister

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,259 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 03

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:51 PM

Um... yeah?!?

Quick question.... name a time and place that has never happened?
  • 1

#3 Satan's Evil Twin

Satan's Evil Twin

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,028 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:55 PM

Um... yeah?!?

Quick question.... name a time and place that has never happened?


Earth, five billion years ago.

:picard:

Uh... Norway? Iceland? Those two seem to have their crap in order.

Edited by Scorpio Ego, 23 July 2012 - 10:58 PM.

  • 1

Posted Image


Father (Peace be upon You) Satan (Peace be upon You), I call to you (Peace be upon You) from the deepest parts of my heart, I praise your (Peace be upon You) name with every breath of my body, I worship you (Peace be upon You) with every fiber of my being. You (Peace be upon You) shown me what true strength is. You (Peace be upon You) have shown me what true love is. Out of the darkness you (Peace be upon You) came to show me the true light.


My master (Peace be upon You), my father (Peace be upon You) and my friend (Peace be upon You) what a great gift that is.


Posted Image Hail to the King (PBUH)! Posted Image


#4 Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,379 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 07

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:57 PM

Earth, five billion years ago.


That's just what they want you to believe.
  • 3

Posted Image Pittsburgh Penguins - CDC GML Posted Image


"My goal is to win the Stanley Cup, and after the offer I received from Buffalo, I believe this is the best place to make it happen." - Christian Ehrhoff


#5 theminister

theminister

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,259 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 03

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:57 PM

Earth, five billion years ago.


You think the Annunaki let the Interstellar Press know what they were going to make here?

Pfft.... as if.
  • 0

#6 Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,379 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 07

Posted 23 July 2012 - 11:00 PM

You think the Annunaki let the Interstellar Press know what they were going to make here?

Pfft.... as if.


Alright, too much Coast to Coast for you young man. You're starting to sound nuttier than Noory.
  • 0

Posted Image Pittsburgh Penguins - CDC GML Posted Image


"My goal is to win the Stanley Cup, and after the offer I received from Buffalo, I believe this is the best place to make it happen." - Christian Ehrhoff


#7 Dr. Wulfgang

Dr. Wulfgang

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Joined: 22-July 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 02:41 AM

Could just be me, but I prefer to know the name of my non-consentual and overly aggressive lovers.
  • 0
Posted Image

#8 ronthecivil

ronthecivil

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,713 posts
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted 24 July 2012 - 09:40 AM

Could just be me, but I prefer to know the name of my non-consentual and overly aggressive lovers


Oh come on buy yourself a sense of adventure you prude! Besides, when the mysterious men are imaginary anyways who care let your imagination soar!

Edited by ronthecivil, 24 July 2012 - 09:40 AM.

  • 0

#9 Heretic

Heretic

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,713 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 07

Posted 24 July 2012 - 11:41 AM

Does this mean they know who really shot JFK?
  • 0

McCoy: We were speculating. Is God really out there?
Kirk: Maybe he's not out there, Bones. Maybe he's right here. [points to his heart]

Posted Image


#10 Humble Rodent

Humble Rodent

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,792 posts
  • Joined: 08-October 06

Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:14 PM

Is dank some sort of like parody account or something?
  • 0

Posted Image


#11 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,394 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:25 PM

But, if they censor the media... Then that would mean they wanted the NY Times to report this!!!
Conspiracies everywhere! :frantic:

Edited by Jagermeister, 24 July 2012 - 12:26 PM.

  • 2
Posted Image

#12 ronthecivil

ronthecivil

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,713 posts
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:26 PM

What would the government need to censor when the "news" is nothing more than weather, traffic, sports and some fluff?

That the news gets things wrong regularly, or is biased, or may tend to be more like an informerical for one of it's sponsors is the real conspiracy.

Alas, that is what the public wants though. So that's what it gets. Traffic, weather, sports, fluff, gadgets. Maybe a two minute segment of around the world where you get four thirty second segments on Syrians killing each other, Egypt sort of being democratic, some place flooding. Maybe ten minutes at the start on some local tragedy followed with a small segment on the local issue de jour. But then thankfully back to fluff.

If you want in depth analysis on cable you're probably best off going to a business channel for economy stuff and the parody shows (like Colbert) for in depth poltical analysis (a sign of how truely sad mainstream reporting is!).
  • 0

#13 Bertuzzi Babe

Bertuzzi Babe

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts
  • Joined: 03-May 03

Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:32 PM

But, if they censor the media... Then that would mean they wanted the NY Times to report this!!!
Conspiracies everywhere! :frantic:


Ooooooooooo................

Posted Image


:lol:
  • 1

"Sursumredditio" non usquam in hac mea loquantur!



Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.....



#14 TimberWolf

TimberWolf

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,094 posts
  • Joined: 28-February 04

Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:35 PM

But, if they censor the media... Then that would mean they wanted the NY Times to report this!!!
Conspiracies everywhere! :frantic:



  • 0

I was saying Lu-Urns...

“That guys an idiot. It’s his own fault if he can’t tell the difference between an all star center and a plug defenceman”

"It's not the location. We just can't beat the Canucks. Thank god they're in the West."


#15 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:46 PM

The MEDIA is the biggest controller of the news. Not the White House nor Romney.

nobody controls the media. They BRIBE the media, but only the media controls the media.
  • 0
Posted Image

#16 Heretic

Heretic

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,713 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 07

Posted 24 July 2012 - 01:11 PM

The MEDIA is the biggest controller of the news. Not the White House nor Romney.

nobody controls the media. They BRIBE the media, but only the media controls the media.


Nobody?

Posted Image
  • 0

McCoy: We were speculating. Is God really out there?
Kirk: Maybe he's not out there, Bones. Maybe he's right here. [points to his heart]

Posted Image


#17 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 01:31 PM

Nobody?

Posted Image


Nope. The only thing the media has to do is 'shape' what we want to hear. Once they do that, they have us. Once they have us, everyone and their dog bows down to the media.

So does that mean we control the media? Nope. Thats what 'polling' is for. To figure out what we want.
  • 0
Posted Image

#18 ronthecivil

ronthecivil

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,713 posts
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted 24 July 2012 - 01:56 PM

Nope. The only thing the media has to do is 'shape' what we want to hear. Once they do that, they have us. Once they have us, everyone and their dog bows down to the media.

So does that mean we control the media? Nope. Thats what 'polling' is for. To figure out what we want.


Well, sometimes it's to figure out what they want. Other times it's to lead the herd. I mean, how can you oppose higher interest rates when 80% of Canadians want them to remain low! Why not join the rest of us instead of being such an outsider.....
  • 0

#19 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 01:58 PM

Well, sometimes it's to figure out what they want. Other times it's to lead the herd. I mean, how can you oppose higher interest rates when 80% of Canadians want them to remain low! Why not join the rest of us instead of being such an outsider.....


I know. I hear you .

To the original point though, if the government could control the media........Fox News would be off the air , there is no doubt about that.
  • 0
Posted Image

#20 ronthecivil

ronthecivil

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,713 posts
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted 24 July 2012 - 02:53 PM

I know. I hear you .

To the original point though, if the government could control the media........Fox News would be off the air , there is no doubt about that.


If the government controlled the media they wouldn't have been cheerleading the misinformation campaign over the HST!

If the banks and real estate industry controlled the media (the news hour is brought to you by Remax apparently) they would probably cheer the high prices as though we were headed to new found riches and not really worry about the fact that the country is skyrocketing into debt. But hey, why upset the sponsors and bore the audience with numbers and finance?!? It's not like they didn't tell us what the TSX is up to, that should be more than enough info!
  • 1

#21 nuckin_futz

nuckin_futz

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,051 posts
  • Joined: 09-January 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 03:21 PM

Well, sometimes it's to figure out what they want. Other times it's to lead the herd. I mean, how can you oppose higher interest rates when 80% of Canadians want them to remain low! Why not join the rest of us instead of being such an outsider.....


They'll be begging for higher rates when inflation is really out of control and it costs $8 for a loaf of bread.
  • 0

#22 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 03:26 PM

If the government controlled the media they wouldn't have been cheerleading the misinformation campaign over the HST!

If the banks and real estate industry controlled the media (the news hour is brought to you by Remax apparently) they would probably cheer the high prices as though we were headed to new found riches and not really worry about the fact that the country is skyrocketing into debt. But hey, why upset the sponsors and bore the audience with numbers and finance?!? It's not like they didn't tell us what the TSX is up to, that should be more than enough info!


lol

Good post.
  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.